Consensus design of a calibration experiment for human fear conditioning
Standard
Consensus design of a calibration experiment for human fear conditioning. / Bach, Dominik R; Sporrer, Juliana; Abend, Rany; Beckers, Tom; Dunsmoor, Joseph E; Fullana, Miquel A; Gamer, Matthias; Gee, Dylan G; Hamm, Alfons; Hartley, Catherine A; Herringa, Ryan J; Jovanovic, Tanja; Kalisch, Raffael; Knight, David C; Lissek, Shmuel; Lonsdorf, Tina B; Merz, Christian J; Milad, Mohammed; Morriss, Jayne; Phelps, Elizabeth A; Pine, Daniel S; Olsson, Andreas; van Reekum, Carien M; Schiller, Daniela.
in: NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, Jahrgang 148, 05.2023, S. 105146.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Review › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus design of a calibration experiment for human fear conditioning
AU - Bach, Dominik R
AU - Sporrer, Juliana
AU - Abend, Rany
AU - Beckers, Tom
AU - Dunsmoor, Joseph E
AU - Fullana, Miquel A
AU - Gamer, Matthias
AU - Gee, Dylan G
AU - Hamm, Alfons
AU - Hartley, Catherine A
AU - Herringa, Ryan J
AU - Jovanovic, Tanja
AU - Kalisch, Raffael
AU - Knight, David C
AU - Lissek, Shmuel
AU - Lonsdorf, Tina B
AU - Merz, Christian J
AU - Milad, Mohammed
AU - Morriss, Jayne
AU - Phelps, Elizabeth A
AU - Pine, Daniel S
AU - Olsson, Andreas
AU - van Reekum, Carien M
AU - Schiller, Daniela
N1 - Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Fear conditioning is a widely used laboratory model to investigate learning, memory, and psychopathology across species. The quantification of learning in this paradigm is heterogeneous in humans and psychometric properties of different quantification methods can be difficult to establish. To overcome this obstacle, calibration is a standard metrological procedure in which well-defined values of a latent variable are generated in an established experimental paradigm. These intended values then serve as validity criterion to rank methods. Here, we develop a calibration protocol for human fear conditioning. Based on a literature review, series of workshops, and survey of N = 96 experts, we propose a calibration experiment and settings for 25 design variables to calibrate the measurement of fear conditioning. Design variables were chosen to be as theory-free as possible and allow wide applicability in different experimental contexts. Besides establishing a specific calibration procedure, the general calibration process we outline may serve as a blueprint for calibration efforts in other subfields of behavioral neuroscience that need measurement refinement.
AB - Fear conditioning is a widely used laboratory model to investigate learning, memory, and psychopathology across species. The quantification of learning in this paradigm is heterogeneous in humans and psychometric properties of different quantification methods can be difficult to establish. To overcome this obstacle, calibration is a standard metrological procedure in which well-defined values of a latent variable are generated in an established experimental paradigm. These intended values then serve as validity criterion to rank methods. Here, we develop a calibration protocol for human fear conditioning. Based on a literature review, series of workshops, and survey of N = 96 experts, we propose a calibration experiment and settings for 25 design variables to calibrate the measurement of fear conditioning. Design variables were chosen to be as theory-free as possible and allow wide applicability in different experimental contexts. Besides establishing a specific calibration procedure, the general calibration process we outline may serve as a blueprint for calibration efforts in other subfields of behavioral neuroscience that need measurement refinement.
KW - Humans
KW - Calibration
KW - Learning
KW - Fear
U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105146
DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105146
M3 - SCORING: Review article
C2 - 36990370
VL - 148
SP - 105146
JO - NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R
JF - NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R
SN - 0149-7634
ER -