Confirmatory factor analysis of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) based on DSM-5 vs. ICD-11 criteria

Standard

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) based on DSM-5 vs. ICD-11 criteria. / Krüger-Gottschalk, Antje; Ehring, Thomas; Knaevelsrud, Christine; Dyer, Anne; Schäfer, Ingo; Schellong, Julia; Rau, Heinrich; Köhler, Kai.

in: EUR J PSYCHOTRAUMATO, Jahrgang 13, Nr. 1, 2010995, 2022.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Krüger-Gottschalk, A, Ehring, T, Knaevelsrud, C, Dyer, A, Schäfer, I, Schellong, J, Rau, H & Köhler, K 2022, 'Confirmatory factor analysis of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) based on DSM-5 vs. ICD-11 criteria', EUR J PSYCHOTRAUMATO, Jg. 13, Nr. 1, 2010995. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.2010995

APA

Krüger-Gottschalk, A., Ehring, T., Knaevelsrud, C., Dyer, A., Schäfer, I., Schellong, J., Rau, H., & Köhler, K. (2022). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) based on DSM-5 vs. ICD-11 criteria. EUR J PSYCHOTRAUMATO, 13(1), [2010995]. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.2010995

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f3db1792660340e1ac0b1c78e54deeae,
title = "Confirmatory factor analysis of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) based on DSM-5 vs. ICD-11 criteria",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Many studies have investigated the latent structure of the DSM-5 criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, most research on this topic was based on self-report data. We aimed to investigate the latent structure of PTSD based on a clinical interview, the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5).METHOD: A clinical sample of 345 participants took part in this multi-centre study. Participants were assessed with the CAPS-5 and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5). We evaluated eight competing models of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms and three competing models of ICD-11 PTSD symptoms.RESULTS: The internal consistency of the CAPS-5 was replicated. In CFAs, the Anhedonia model emerged as the best fitting model within all tested DSM-5 models. However, when compared with the Anhedonia model, the non-nested ICD-11 model as a less complex three-factor solution showed better model fit indices.DISCUSSION: We discuss the findings in the context of earlier empirical findings as well as theoretical models of PTSD.",
keywords = "Adult, Anhedonia, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, International Classification of Diseases/standards, Interviews as Topic, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis",
author = "Antje Kr{\"u}ger-Gottschalk and Thomas Ehring and Christine Knaevelsrud and Anne Dyer and Ingo Sch{\"a}fer and Julia Schellong and Heinrich Rau and Kai K{\"o}hler",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1080/20008198.2021.2010995",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "EUR J PSYCHOTRAUMATO",
issn = "2000-8198",
publisher = "Co-Action Publishing",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confirmatory factor analysis of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) based on DSM-5 vs. ICD-11 criteria

AU - Krüger-Gottschalk, Antje

AU - Ehring, Thomas

AU - Knaevelsrud, Christine

AU - Dyer, Anne

AU - Schäfer, Ingo

AU - Schellong, Julia

AU - Rau, Heinrich

AU - Köhler, Kai

N1 - © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Many studies have investigated the latent structure of the DSM-5 criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, most research on this topic was based on self-report data. We aimed to investigate the latent structure of PTSD based on a clinical interview, the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5).METHOD: A clinical sample of 345 participants took part in this multi-centre study. Participants were assessed with the CAPS-5 and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5). We evaluated eight competing models of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms and three competing models of ICD-11 PTSD symptoms.RESULTS: The internal consistency of the CAPS-5 was replicated. In CFAs, the Anhedonia model emerged as the best fitting model within all tested DSM-5 models. However, when compared with the Anhedonia model, the non-nested ICD-11 model as a less complex three-factor solution showed better model fit indices.DISCUSSION: We discuss the findings in the context of earlier empirical findings as well as theoretical models of PTSD.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Many studies have investigated the latent structure of the DSM-5 criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, most research on this topic was based on self-report data. We aimed to investigate the latent structure of PTSD based on a clinical interview, the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5).METHOD: A clinical sample of 345 participants took part in this multi-centre study. Participants were assessed with the CAPS-5 and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5). We evaluated eight competing models of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms and three competing models of ICD-11 PTSD symptoms.RESULTS: The internal consistency of the CAPS-5 was replicated. In CFAs, the Anhedonia model emerged as the best fitting model within all tested DSM-5 models. However, when compared with the Anhedonia model, the non-nested ICD-11 model as a less complex three-factor solution showed better model fit indices.DISCUSSION: We discuss the findings in the context of earlier empirical findings as well as theoretical models of PTSD.

KW - Adult

KW - Anhedonia

KW - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

KW - Factor Analysis, Statistical

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - International Classification of Diseases/standards

KW - Interviews as Topic

KW - Male

KW - Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data

KW - Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis

U2 - 10.1080/20008198.2021.2010995

DO - 10.1080/20008198.2021.2010995

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 35070160

VL - 13

JO - EUR J PSYCHOTRAUMATO

JF - EUR J PSYCHOTRAUMATO

SN - 2000-8198

IS - 1

M1 - 2010995

ER -