Computerized cognitive behavior therapy for patients with mild to moderately severe depression in primary care: A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial (@ktiv)

Standard

Computerized cognitive behavior therapy for patients with mild to moderately severe depression in primary care: A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial (@ktiv). / Löbner, Margrit; Pabst, Alexander; Stein, Janine; Dorow, Marie; Matschinger, Herbert; Luppa, Melanie; Maroß, Astrid; Kersting, Anette; König, Hans-Helmut; Riedel-Heller, Steffi G.

in: J AFFECT DISORDERS, Jahrgang 238, 01.10.2018, S. 317-326.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ab2eda0cd9b44feb8366b08b2af5606d,
title = "Computerized cognitive behavior therapy for patients with mild to moderately severe depression in primary care: A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial (@ktiv)",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Self-guided computerized cognitive behavior therapy (cCBT) has the potential to be a feasible alternative to current first-step treatment approaches for depression. Yet, research regarding the effectiveness and acceptability of self-guided cCBT as an adjunct element of GP care is controversial.METHODS: Primary care patients with symptoms of mild to moderately severe depression (N = 647) were recruited from 112 GP practices within a cluster randomized controlled trial. GPs were randomized to groups that provided either cCBT (internet intervention) plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Primary outcomes were self-reported depression severity according to the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis was performed.RESULTS: ITT analyses showed significant between group differences in depressive symptoms for BDI-II in favor of the intervention group, corresponding to a small effect size (6 weeks: d = 0.36, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.53, P < .001; 6 months: d = 0.41, 95% 0.22 to 0.59, P < .001). The number needed to treat (NNT) at six months was 6.2. PHQ-9 analyses was solely significant at six months (d = 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.44, P < .05, NNT = 9.2). PP analyses highly agree with these findings.LIMITATIONS: The initial response rate with regard to the recruitment of GP practices for the trial was low.CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that cCBT is effective in reducing depressive symptoms in mildly to moderately severe depressed primary care patients. Efforts should be made to raise awareness about the potential of such freely accessible treatment options among GPs and patients.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Margrit L{\"o}bner and Alexander Pabst and Janine Stein and Marie Dorow and Herbert Matschinger and Melanie Luppa and Astrid Maro{\ss} and Anette Kersting and Hans-Helmut K{\"o}nig and Riedel-Heller, {Steffi G}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2018.06.008",
language = "English",
volume = "238",
pages = "317--326",
journal = "J AFFECT DISORDERS",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computerized cognitive behavior therapy for patients with mild to moderately severe depression in primary care: A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial (@ktiv)

AU - Löbner, Margrit

AU - Pabst, Alexander

AU - Stein, Janine

AU - Dorow, Marie

AU - Matschinger, Herbert

AU - Luppa, Melanie

AU - Maroß, Astrid

AU - Kersting, Anette

AU - König, Hans-Helmut

AU - Riedel-Heller, Steffi G

N1 - Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Self-guided computerized cognitive behavior therapy (cCBT) has the potential to be a feasible alternative to current first-step treatment approaches for depression. Yet, research regarding the effectiveness and acceptability of self-guided cCBT as an adjunct element of GP care is controversial.METHODS: Primary care patients with symptoms of mild to moderately severe depression (N = 647) were recruited from 112 GP practices within a cluster randomized controlled trial. GPs were randomized to groups that provided either cCBT (internet intervention) plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Primary outcomes were self-reported depression severity according to the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis was performed.RESULTS: ITT analyses showed significant between group differences in depressive symptoms for BDI-II in favor of the intervention group, corresponding to a small effect size (6 weeks: d = 0.36, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.53, P < .001; 6 months: d = 0.41, 95% 0.22 to 0.59, P < .001). The number needed to treat (NNT) at six months was 6.2. PHQ-9 analyses was solely significant at six months (d = 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.44, P < .05, NNT = 9.2). PP analyses highly agree with these findings.LIMITATIONS: The initial response rate with regard to the recruitment of GP practices for the trial was low.CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that cCBT is effective in reducing depressive symptoms in mildly to moderately severe depressed primary care patients. Efforts should be made to raise awareness about the potential of such freely accessible treatment options among GPs and patients.

AB - BACKGROUND: Self-guided computerized cognitive behavior therapy (cCBT) has the potential to be a feasible alternative to current first-step treatment approaches for depression. Yet, research regarding the effectiveness and acceptability of self-guided cCBT as an adjunct element of GP care is controversial.METHODS: Primary care patients with symptoms of mild to moderately severe depression (N = 647) were recruited from 112 GP practices within a cluster randomized controlled trial. GPs were randomized to groups that provided either cCBT (internet intervention) plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Primary outcomes were self-reported depression severity according to the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis was performed.RESULTS: ITT analyses showed significant between group differences in depressive symptoms for BDI-II in favor of the intervention group, corresponding to a small effect size (6 weeks: d = 0.36, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.53, P < .001; 6 months: d = 0.41, 95% 0.22 to 0.59, P < .001). The number needed to treat (NNT) at six months was 6.2. PHQ-9 analyses was solely significant at six months (d = 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.44, P < .05, NNT = 9.2). PP analyses highly agree with these findings.LIMITATIONS: The initial response rate with regard to the recruitment of GP practices for the trial was low.CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that cCBT is effective in reducing depressive symptoms in mildly to moderately severe depressed primary care patients. Efforts should be made to raise awareness about the potential of such freely accessible treatment options among GPs and patients.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2018.06.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2018.06.008

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 29902736

VL - 238

SP - 317

EP - 326

JO - J AFFECT DISORDERS

JF - J AFFECT DISORDERS

SN - 0165-0327

ER -