Complications Following Common Inpatient Urological Procedures: Temporal Trend Analysis from 2000 to 2010

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complications Following Common Inpatient Urological Procedures: Temporal Trend Analysis from 2000 to 2010

AU - Meyer, Christian P

AU - Hollis, Michael

AU - Cole, Alexander P

AU - Hanske, Julian

AU - O'Leary, James

AU - Gupta, Soham

AU - Löppenberg, Björn

AU - Zavaski, Mike E

AU - Sun, Maxine

AU - Sammon, Jesse D

AU - Kibel, Adam S

AU - Fisch, Margit

AU - Chun, Felix K H

AU - Trinh, Quoc-Dien

N1 - Copyright © 2015 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2016/4

Y1 - 2016/4

N2 - BACKGROUND: Measuring procedure-specific complication-rate trends allows for benchmarking and improvement in quality of care but must be done in a standardized fashion.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified all instances of eight common inpatient urologic procedures performed in the United States between 2000 and 2010. This yielded 327218 cases including both oncologic and benign diseases. Complications were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Each complication was cross-referenced to the procedure code and graded according to the standardized Clavien system.OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The Mann-Whitney and chi-square were used to assess the statistical significance of medians and proportions, respectively. We assessed temporal variability in the rates of overall complications (Clavien grade 1-4), length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality using the estimated annual percent change (EAPC) linear regression methodology.RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We observed an overall reduction in length of stay (EAPC: -1.59; p<0.001), whereas mortality rates remained negligible and unchanged (EAPC: -0.32; p=0.83). Patient comorbidities increased significantly over the study period (EAPC: 2.09; p<0.001), as did the rates of complications. Procedure-specific trends showed a significant increase in complications for inpatient ureterorenoscopy (EAPC: 5.53; p<0.001), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (EAPC: 3.75; p<0.001), radical cystectomy (EAPC: 1.37; p<0.001), radical nephrectomy (EAPC: 1.35; p<0.001), and partial nephrectomy (EAPC: 1.22; p=0.006). Limitations include lack of postdischarge follow-up data, lack of pathologic characteristics, and inability to adjust for secular changes in administrative coding.CONCLUSIONS: In the context of urologic care in the United States, our findings suggest a shift toward more complex oncologic procedures in the inpatient setting, with same-day procedures most likely shifted to the outpatient setting. Consequently, complications have increased for the majority of examined procedures; however, no change in mortality was found.PATIENT SUMMARY: This report evaluated the trends of urologic procedures and their complications. A significant shift toward sicker patients and more complex procedures in the inpatient setting was found, but this did not result in higher mortality. These results are indicators of the high quality of care for urologic procedures in the inpatient setting.

AB - BACKGROUND: Measuring procedure-specific complication-rate trends allows for benchmarking and improvement in quality of care but must be done in a standardized fashion.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified all instances of eight common inpatient urologic procedures performed in the United States between 2000 and 2010. This yielded 327218 cases including both oncologic and benign diseases. Complications were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Each complication was cross-referenced to the procedure code and graded according to the standardized Clavien system.OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The Mann-Whitney and chi-square were used to assess the statistical significance of medians and proportions, respectively. We assessed temporal variability in the rates of overall complications (Clavien grade 1-4), length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality using the estimated annual percent change (EAPC) linear regression methodology.RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We observed an overall reduction in length of stay (EAPC: -1.59; p<0.001), whereas mortality rates remained negligible and unchanged (EAPC: -0.32; p=0.83). Patient comorbidities increased significantly over the study period (EAPC: 2.09; p<0.001), as did the rates of complications. Procedure-specific trends showed a significant increase in complications for inpatient ureterorenoscopy (EAPC: 5.53; p<0.001), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (EAPC: 3.75; p<0.001), radical cystectomy (EAPC: 1.37; p<0.001), radical nephrectomy (EAPC: 1.35; p<0.001), and partial nephrectomy (EAPC: 1.22; p=0.006). Limitations include lack of postdischarge follow-up data, lack of pathologic characteristics, and inability to adjust for secular changes in administrative coding.CONCLUSIONS: In the context of urologic care in the United States, our findings suggest a shift toward more complex oncologic procedures in the inpatient setting, with same-day procedures most likely shifted to the outpatient setting. Consequently, complications have increased for the majority of examined procedures; however, no change in mortality was found.PATIENT SUMMARY: This report evaluated the trends of urologic procedures and their complications. A significant shift toward sicker patients and more complex procedures in the inpatient setting was found, but this did not result in higher mortality. These results are indicators of the high quality of care for urologic procedures in the inpatient setting.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1016/j.euf.2015.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.euf.2015.10.001

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28723447

VL - 2

SP - 3

EP - 9

JO - EUR UROL FOCUS

JF - EUR UROL FOCUS

SN - 2405-4569

IS - 1

ER -