PortalPublikationenCompleting the third person's perspective on patients' invol...

Completing the third person's perspective on patients' involvement in medical decision-making: approaching the full picture.

Standard

Completing the third person's perspective on patients' involvement in medical decision-making: approaching the full picture. / Kasper, Jürgen; Hoffmann, Frauke; Heesen, Christoph; Köpke, Sascha; Geiger, Friedemann.

in: Z EVIDENZ FORTBILD Q, Jahrgang 106, Nr. 4, 4, 2012, S. 275-283.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Kasper, J, Hoffmann, F, Heesen, C, Köpke, S & Geiger, F 2012, 'Completing the third person's perspective on patients' involvement in medical decision-making: approaching the full picture.', Z EVIDENZ FORTBILD Q, Jg. 106, Nr. 4, 4, S. 275-283. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22749075?dopt=Citation>

APA

Kasper, J., Hoffmann, F., Heesen, C., Köpke, S., & Geiger, F. (2012). Completing the third person's perspective on patients' involvement in medical decision-making: approaching the full picture. Z EVIDENZ FORTBILD Q, 106(4), 275-283. [4]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22749075?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Kasper J, Hoffmann F, Heesen C, Köpke S, Geiger F. Completing the third person's perspective on patients' involvement in medical decision-making: approaching the full picture. Z EVIDENZ FORTBILD Q. 2012;106(4):275-283. 4.

Bibtex

@article{e4e3c42ecb02476696470cf5eb2a1938,
title = "Completing the third person's perspective on patients' involvement in medical decision-making: approaching the full picture.",
abstract = "Shared decision making is based on the idea of cooperation and partnership between patients and doctors. In this concept both parties may initiate and perform specific decision-making steps. However, the common observation-based instruments focus solely on doctors' behaviour. Content and quality of information provided to involve patients in medical decisions are hardly considered in evaluation of SDM. This study investigates the advantages of a revised observer inventory taking into account these aspects.",
keywords = "Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Cooperative Behavior, Conflict (Psychology), Program Evaluation, *Decision Making, *Patient Participation, *Physician-Patient Relations, Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data, *Questionnaires, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Cooperative Behavior, Conflict (Psychology), Program Evaluation, *Decision Making, *Patient Participation, *Physician-Patient Relations, Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data, *Questionnaires",
author = "J{\"u}rgen Kasper and Frauke Hoffmann and Christoph Heesen and Sascha K{\"o}pke and Friedemann Geiger",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "106",
pages = "275--283",
journal = "Z EVIDENZ FORTBILD Q",
issn = "1865-9217",
publisher = "Urban und Fischer Verlag Jena",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Completing the third person's perspective on patients' involvement in medical decision-making: approaching the full picture.

AU - Kasper, Jürgen

AU - Hoffmann, Frauke

AU - Heesen, Christoph

AU - Köpke, Sascha

AU - Geiger, Friedemann

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Shared decision making is based on the idea of cooperation and partnership between patients and doctors. In this concept both parties may initiate and perform specific decision-making steps. However, the common observation-based instruments focus solely on doctors' behaviour. Content and quality of information provided to involve patients in medical decisions are hardly considered in evaluation of SDM. This study investigates the advantages of a revised observer inventory taking into account these aspects.

AB - Shared decision making is based on the idea of cooperation and partnership between patients and doctors. In this concept both parties may initiate and perform specific decision-making steps. However, the common observation-based instruments focus solely on doctors' behaviour. Content and quality of information provided to involve patients in medical decisions are hardly considered in evaluation of SDM. This study investigates the advantages of a revised observer inventory taking into account these aspects.

KW - Humans

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Observer Variation

KW - Cooperative Behavior

KW - Conflict (Psychology)

KW - Program Evaluation

KW - Decision Making

KW - Patient Participation

KW - Physician-Patient Relations

KW - Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Humans

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Observer Variation

KW - Cooperative Behavior

KW - Conflict (Psychology)

KW - Program Evaluation

KW - Decision Making

KW - Patient Participation

KW - Physician-Patient Relations

KW - Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data

KW - Questionnaires

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

VL - 106

SP - 275

EP - 283

JO - Z EVIDENZ FORTBILD Q

JF - Z EVIDENZ FORTBILD Q

SN - 1865-9217

IS - 4

M1 - 4

ER -