Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures in multiple sclerosis
Standard
Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures in multiple sclerosis. / Schäffler, N; Schönberg, P; Stephan, J; Stellmann, J-P; Gold, S M; Heesen, C.
in: ACTA NEUROL SCAND, Jahrgang 128, Nr. 2, 01.08.2013, S. 114-21.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures in multiple sclerosis
AU - Schäffler, N
AU - Schönberg, P
AU - Stephan, J
AU - Stellmann, J-P
AU - Gold, S M
AU - Heesen, C
N1 - © 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
PY - 2013/8/1
Y1 - 2013/8/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMS) have been proposed sensitive outcome parameters in multiple sclerosis (MS). In this study, we assessed a German version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) and a revised version of the Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS) in comparison with rater- and physician-based tools.METHODS: Consecutive MS patients (n = 117) of the MS outpatient unit were included. In addition to MSIS-29 and HAQUAMS, the following parameters were obtained: Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and modified Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) [9-hole peg test (9HPT), 25-foot walk test and symbol digit modalities test]. We investigated validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability as well as correlation between these measures.RESULTS: Internal consistency (Cronbach's α ≤ 0.96) and test-retest coefficients (ICC ≤ 0.87) of both scales were high and satisfied psychometric standards. Convergent and discriminant validity was supported by direction, magnitude and pattern of correlation with other rater-based measures depending on the functional subdomain. Both MSIS-29 and HAQUAMS correlated with EDSS (ρ = 0.55 vs 0.62), but stronger correlation was found between MSIS-29 and HAQUAMS total score (ρ = 0.90). Both scales distinguished between patient groups of varied disease severity and cognitive impairment.CONCLUSION: Patient-reported outcome measurements as MSIS-29 and HAQUAMS seem to be valid instruments to detect different impairment levels in comparison with traditional rater-based instruments like EDSS or MSFC.
AB - BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMS) have been proposed sensitive outcome parameters in multiple sclerosis (MS). In this study, we assessed a German version of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) and a revised version of the Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS) in comparison with rater- and physician-based tools.METHODS: Consecutive MS patients (n = 117) of the MS outpatient unit were included. In addition to MSIS-29 and HAQUAMS, the following parameters were obtained: Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and modified Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) [9-hole peg test (9HPT), 25-foot walk test and symbol digit modalities test]. We investigated validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability as well as correlation between these measures.RESULTS: Internal consistency (Cronbach's α ≤ 0.96) and test-retest coefficients (ICC ≤ 0.87) of both scales were high and satisfied psychometric standards. Convergent and discriminant validity was supported by direction, magnitude and pattern of correlation with other rater-based measures depending on the functional subdomain. Both MSIS-29 and HAQUAMS correlated with EDSS (ρ = 0.55 vs 0.62), but stronger correlation was found between MSIS-29 and HAQUAMS total score (ρ = 0.90). Both scales distinguished between patient groups of varied disease severity and cognitive impairment.CONCLUSION: Patient-reported outcome measurements as MSIS-29 and HAQUAMS seem to be valid instruments to detect different impairment levels in comparison with traditional rater-based instruments like EDSS or MSFC.
KW - Adult
KW - Disability Evaluation
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Multiple Sclerosis
KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
KW - Quality of Life
KW - Questionnaires
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Statistics as Topic
U2 - 10.1111/ane.12083
DO - 10.1111/ane.12083
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 23398571
VL - 128
SP - 114
EP - 121
JO - ACTA NEUROL SCAND
JF - ACTA NEUROL SCAND
SN - 0001-6314
IS - 2
ER -