Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes for Open and Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of 1249 Cases.

  • Umberto Capitanio
  • Shahrokh F Shariat
  • Hendrik Isbarn
  • Alon Weizer
  • Mesut Remzi
  • Marco Roscigno
  • Eiji Kikuchi
  • Jay D Raman
  • Christian Bolenz
  • Karim Bensalah
  • Theresa M Koppie
  • Wassim Kassouf
  • Mario I Fernández
  • Philipp Ströbel
  • Jeffrey Wheat
  • Richard Zigeuner
  • Cord Langner
  • Matthias Waldert
  • Mototsugu Oya
  • Charles C Guo
  • Casey Ng
  • Francesco Montorsi
  • Christopher G Wood
  • Vitaly Margulis
  • Pierre I Karakiewicz

Beteiligte Einrichtungen

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) compared to open nephroureterectomy (ONU) are scarce. OBJECTIVE: We compared recurrence and cause-specific mortality rates of ONU and LNU. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen centers from three continents contributed data on 1249 patients with nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). MEASUREMENTS: Univariable and multivariable survival models tested the effect of procedure type (ONU [n=979] vs LNU [n=270]) on cancer recurrence and cancer-specific mortality. Covariables consisted of institution, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score, pT stage, pN stage, tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, tumor location, concomitant carcinoma in situ, ureteral cuff management, previous urothelial bladder cancer, and previous endoscopic treatment. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Median follow-up for censored cases was 49 mo (mean: 62). Relative to ONU, LNU patients had more favorable pathologic stages (pT0/Ta/Tis: 38.1% vs 20.8%, p

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheDeutsch
ISSN0302-2838
StatusVeröffentlicht - 2009
pubmed 19361911