Comparison of Material-mediated Bone Regeneration Capacities of Sintered and Non-sintered Xenogeneic Bone Substitutes via 2D and 3D Data

Standard

Comparison of Material-mediated Bone Regeneration Capacities of Sintered and Non-sintered Xenogeneic Bone Substitutes via 2D and 3D Data. / Kapogianni, Eleni; Barbeck, Mike; Jung, Ole; Arslan, Aylin; Kuhnel, Lennart; Xiong, Xin; Krastev, Rumen; Friedrich, Reinhard E.; Schnettler, Reinhard; Fienitz, Tim; Rothamel, Daniel.

in: IN VIVO, Jahrgang 33, Nr. 6, 31.10.2019, S. 2169-2179.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Kapogianni, E, Barbeck, M, Jung, O, Arslan, A, Kuhnel, L, Xiong, X, Krastev, R, Friedrich, RE, Schnettler, R, Fienitz, T & Rothamel, D 2019, 'Comparison of Material-mediated Bone Regeneration Capacities of Sintered and Non-sintered Xenogeneic Bone Substitutes via 2D and 3D Data', IN VIVO, Jg. 33, Nr. 6, S. 2169-2179. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11719

APA

Kapogianni, E., Barbeck, M., Jung, O., Arslan, A., Kuhnel, L., Xiong, X., Krastev, R., Friedrich, R. E., Schnettler, R., Fienitz, T., & Rothamel, D. (2019). Comparison of Material-mediated Bone Regeneration Capacities of Sintered and Non-sintered Xenogeneic Bone Substitutes via 2D and 3D Data. IN VIVO, 33(6), 2169-2179. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11719

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{3d478261d36c41dfbb675252d6fcda77,
title = "Comparison of Material-mediated Bone Regeneration Capacities of Sintered and Non-sintered Xenogeneic Bone Substitutes via 2D and 3D Data",
abstract = "BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was the development of a new osteoconductivity index to determine the bone healing capacities of bone substitute materials (BSM) on the basis of 3D microcomputed tomographic (μ-CT) data.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sinus biopsies were used for the comparative analysis of the integration behavior of two xenogeneic BSM (cerabone{\textregistered} and Bio-Oss{\textregistered}). 3D μ-CT and data sets from histomorphometrical measurements based on 2D histological slices were used to measure the bone-material-contact and the tissue distribution within the biopsies. The tissue reactions to both BSM were microscopically analyzed.RESULTS: The 3D and 2D results of the osteoconductivity measurements showed comparable material-bone contacts for both BSM, but the 2D data were significantly lower. The same results were found when tissue distribution was measured in both groups. The histopathological analysis showed comparative tissue reactions in both BSM.CONCLUSION: Osteoconductivity index is a reliable measurement parameter for determining the healing capacities of BSM. The observed differences between both measurement methods could be assigned to the resolution capacity of μ-CT data that did not allow for a precise interface distinction between both BSM and bone tissue. Histomorphometrical data based on histological slides still allow for a more exact evaluation.",
author = "Eleni Kapogianni and Mike Barbeck and Ole Jung and Aylin Arslan and Lennart Kuhnel and Xin Xiong and Rumen Krastev and Friedrich, {Reinhard E.} and Reinhard Schnettler and Tim Fienitz and Daniel Rothamel",
note = "Copyright{\textcopyright} 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
day = "31",
doi = "10.21873/invivo.11719",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "2169--2179",
journal = "IN VIVO",
issn = "0258-851X",
publisher = "International Institute of Anticancer Research",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Material-mediated Bone Regeneration Capacities of Sintered and Non-sintered Xenogeneic Bone Substitutes via 2D and 3D Data

AU - Kapogianni, Eleni

AU - Barbeck, Mike

AU - Jung, Ole

AU - Arslan, Aylin

AU - Kuhnel, Lennart

AU - Xiong, Xin

AU - Krastev, Rumen

AU - Friedrich, Reinhard E.

AU - Schnettler, Reinhard

AU - Fienitz, Tim

AU - Rothamel, Daniel

N1 - Copyright© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/10/31

Y1 - 2019/10/31

N2 - BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was the development of a new osteoconductivity index to determine the bone healing capacities of bone substitute materials (BSM) on the basis of 3D microcomputed tomographic (μ-CT) data.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sinus biopsies were used for the comparative analysis of the integration behavior of two xenogeneic BSM (cerabone® and Bio-Oss®). 3D μ-CT and data sets from histomorphometrical measurements based on 2D histological slices were used to measure the bone-material-contact and the tissue distribution within the biopsies. The tissue reactions to both BSM were microscopically analyzed.RESULTS: The 3D and 2D results of the osteoconductivity measurements showed comparable material-bone contacts for both BSM, but the 2D data were significantly lower. The same results were found when tissue distribution was measured in both groups. The histopathological analysis showed comparative tissue reactions in both BSM.CONCLUSION: Osteoconductivity index is a reliable measurement parameter for determining the healing capacities of BSM. The observed differences between both measurement methods could be assigned to the resolution capacity of μ-CT data that did not allow for a precise interface distinction between both BSM and bone tissue. Histomorphometrical data based on histological slides still allow for a more exact evaluation.

AB - BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was the development of a new osteoconductivity index to determine the bone healing capacities of bone substitute materials (BSM) on the basis of 3D microcomputed tomographic (μ-CT) data.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sinus biopsies were used for the comparative analysis of the integration behavior of two xenogeneic BSM (cerabone® and Bio-Oss®). 3D μ-CT and data sets from histomorphometrical measurements based on 2D histological slices were used to measure the bone-material-contact and the tissue distribution within the biopsies. The tissue reactions to both BSM were microscopically analyzed.RESULTS: The 3D and 2D results of the osteoconductivity measurements showed comparable material-bone contacts for both BSM, but the 2D data were significantly lower. The same results were found when tissue distribution was measured in both groups. The histopathological analysis showed comparative tissue reactions in both BSM.CONCLUSION: Osteoconductivity index is a reliable measurement parameter for determining the healing capacities of BSM. The observed differences between both measurement methods could be assigned to the resolution capacity of μ-CT data that did not allow for a precise interface distinction between both BSM and bone tissue. Histomorphometrical data based on histological slides still allow for a more exact evaluation.

U2 - 10.21873/invivo.11719

DO - 10.21873/invivo.11719

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 31662553

VL - 33

SP - 2169

EP - 2179

JO - IN VIVO

JF - IN VIVO

SN - 0258-851X

IS - 6

ER -