PortalPublikationenComparison of major depression diagnostic classification pro...

Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum - An individual participant data meta-analysis

Standard

Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum - An individual participant data meta-analysis. / Levis, Brooke; McMillan, Dean; Sun, Ying; He, Chen; Rice, Danielle B; Krishnan, Ankur; Wu, Yin; Azar, Marleine; Sanchez, Tatiana A; Chiovitti, Matthew J; Bhandari, Parash Mani; Neupane, Dipika; Saadat, Nazanin; Riehm, Kira E; Imran, Mahrukh; Boruff, Jill T; Cuijpers, Pim; Gilbody, Simon; Ioannidis, John P A; Kloda, Lorie A; Patten, Scott B; Shrier, Ian; Ziegelstein, Roy C; Comeau, Liane; Mitchell, Nicholas D; Tonelli, Marcello; Vigod, Simone N; Aceti, Franca; Alvarado, Rubén; Alvarado-Esquivel, Cosme; Bakare, Muideen O; Barnes, Jacqueline; Beck, Cheryl Tatano; Bindt, Carola; Boyce, Philip M; Bunevicius, Adomas; Couto, Tiago Castro E; Chaudron, Linda H; Correa, Humberto; de Figueiredo, Felipe Pinheiro; Eapen, Valsamma; Fernandes, Michelle; Figueiredo, Barbara; Fisher, Jane R W; Garcia-Esteve, Lluïsa; Giardinelli, Lisa; Helle, Nadine; Howard, Louise M; Khalifa, Dina Sami; Kohlhoff, Jane; Kusminskas, Laima; Kozinszky, Zoltán; Lelli, Lorenzo; Leonardou, Angeliki A; Lewis, Beth A; Maes, Michael; Meuti, Valentina; Nakić Radoš, Sandra; Navarro García, Purificación; Nishi, Daisuke; Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono, Daniel; Robertson-Blackmore, Emma; Rochat, Tamsen J; Rowe, Heather J; Siu, Bonnie W M; Skalkidou, Alkistis; Stein, Alan; Stewart, Robert C; Su, Kuan-Pin; Sundström-Poromaa, Inger; Tadinac, Meri; Tandon, S Darius; Tendais, Iva; Thiagayson, Pavaani; Töreki, Annamária; Torres-Giménez, Anna; Tran, Thach D; Trevillion, Kylee; Turner, Katherine; Vega-Dienstmaier, Johann M; Wynter, Karen; Yonkers, Kimberly A; Benedetti, Andrea; Thombs, Brett D.

in: INT J METH PSYCH RES, Jahrgang 28, Nr. 4, 12.2019, S. e1803.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Levis, B, McMillan, D, Sun, Y, He, C, Rice, DB, Krishnan, A, Wu, Y, Azar, M, Sanchez, TA, Chiovitti, MJ, Bhandari, PM, Neupane, D, Saadat, N, Riehm, KE, Imran, M, Boruff, JT, Cuijpers, P, Gilbody, S, Ioannidis, JPA, Kloda, LA, Patten, SB, Shrier, I, Ziegelstein, RC, Comeau, L, Mitchell, ND, Tonelli, M, Vigod, SN, Aceti, F, Alvarado, R, Alvarado-Esquivel, C, Bakare, MO, Barnes, J, Beck, CT, Bindt, C, Boyce, PM, Bunevicius, A, Couto, TCE, Chaudron, LH, Correa, H, de Figueiredo, FP, Eapen, V, Fernandes, M, Figueiredo, B, Fisher, JRW, Garcia-Esteve, L, Giardinelli, L, Helle, N, Howard, LM, Khalifa, DS, Kohlhoff, J, Kusminskas, L, Kozinszky, Z, Lelli, L, Leonardou, AA, Lewis, BA, Maes, M, Meuti, V, Nakić Radoš, S, Navarro García, P, Nishi, D, Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono, D, Robertson-Blackmore, E, Rochat, TJ, Rowe, HJ, Siu, BWM, Skalkidou, A, Stein, A, Stewart, RC, Su, K-P, Sundström-Poromaa, I, Tadinac, M, Tandon, SD, Tendais, I, Thiagayson, P, Töreki, A, Torres-Giménez, A, Tran, TD, Trevillion, K, Turner, K, Vega-Dienstmaier, JM, Wynter, K, Yonkers, KA, Benedetti, A & Thombs, BD 2019, 'Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum - An individual participant data meta-analysis', INT J METH PSYCH RES, Jg. 28, Nr. 4, S. e1803. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1803

APA

Levis, B., McMillan, D., Sun, Y., He, C., Rice, D. B., Krishnan, A., Wu, Y., Azar, M., Sanchez, T. A., Chiovitti, M. J., Bhandari, P. M., Neupane, D., Saadat, N., Riehm, K. E., Imran, M., Boruff, J. T., Cuijpers, P., Gilbody, S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., ... Thombs, B. D. (2019). Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum - An individual participant data meta-analysis. INT J METH PSYCH RES, 28(4), e1803. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1803

Vancouver

Levis B, McMillan D, Sun Y, He C, Rice DB, Krishnan A et al. Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum - An individual participant data meta-analysis. INT J METH PSYCH RES. 2019 Dez;28(4):e1803. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1803

Bibtex

@article{1ad7fafb2139404bb84913583a4e9a89,
title = "Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum - An individual participant data meta-analysis",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum.METHODS: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics.RESULTS: Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased.CONCLUSION: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.",
author = "Brooke Levis and Dean McMillan and Ying Sun and Chen He and Rice, {Danielle B} and Ankur Krishnan and Yin Wu and Marleine Azar and Sanchez, {Tatiana A} and Chiovitti, {Matthew J} and Bhandari, {Parash Mani} and Dipika Neupane and Nazanin Saadat and Riehm, {Kira E} and Mahrukh Imran and Boruff, {Jill T} and Pim Cuijpers and Simon Gilbody and Ioannidis, {John P A} and Kloda, {Lorie A} and Patten, {Scott B} and Ian Shrier and Ziegelstein, {Roy C} and Liane Comeau and Mitchell, {Nicholas D} and Marcello Tonelli and Vigod, {Simone N} and Franca Aceti and Rub{\'e}n Alvarado and Cosme Alvarado-Esquivel and Bakare, {Muideen O} and Jacqueline Barnes and Beck, {Cheryl Tatano} and Carola Bindt and Boyce, {Philip M} and Adomas Bunevicius and Couto, {Tiago Castro E} and Chaudron, {Linda H} and Humberto Correa and {de Figueiredo}, {Felipe Pinheiro} and Valsamma Eapen and Michelle Fernandes and Barbara Figueiredo and Fisher, {Jane R W} and Llu{\"i}sa Garcia-Esteve and Lisa Giardinelli and Nadine Helle and Howard, {Louise M} and Khalifa, {Dina Sami} and Jane Kohlhoff and Laima Kusminskas and Zolt{\'a}n Kozinszky and Lorenzo Lelli and Leonardou, {Angeliki A} and Lewis, {Beth A} and Michael Maes and Valentina Meuti and {Naki{\'c} Rado{\v s}}, Sandra and {Navarro Garc{\'i}a}, Purificaci{\'o}n and Daisuke Nishi and {Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono}, Daniel and Emma Robertson-Blackmore and Rochat, {Tamsen J} and Rowe, {Heather J} and Siu, {Bonnie W M} and Alkistis Skalkidou and Alan Stein and Stewart, {Robert C} and Kuan-Pin Su and Inger Sundstr{\"o}m-Poromaa and Meri Tadinac and Tandon, {S Darius} and Iva Tendais and Pavaani Thiagayson and Annam{\'a}ria T{\"o}reki and Anna Torres-Gim{\'e}nez and Tran, {Thach D} and Kylee Trevillion and Katherine Turner and Vega-Dienstmaier, {Johann M} and Karen Wynter and Yonkers, {Kimberly A} and Andrea Benedetti and Thombs, {Brett D}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2019 The Authors. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2019",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1002/mpr.1803",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "e1803",
journal = "INT J METH PSYCH RES",
issn = "1049-8931",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum - An individual participant data meta-analysis

AU - Levis, Brooke

AU - McMillan, Dean

AU - Sun, Ying

AU - He, Chen

AU - Rice, Danielle B

AU - Krishnan, Ankur

AU - Wu, Yin

AU - Azar, Marleine

AU - Sanchez, Tatiana A

AU - Chiovitti, Matthew J

AU - Bhandari, Parash Mani

AU - Neupane, Dipika

AU - Saadat, Nazanin

AU - Riehm, Kira E

AU - Imran, Mahrukh

AU - Boruff, Jill T

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

AU - Gilbody, Simon

AU - Ioannidis, John P A

AU - Kloda, Lorie A

AU - Patten, Scott B

AU - Shrier, Ian

AU - Ziegelstein, Roy C

AU - Comeau, Liane

AU - Mitchell, Nicholas D

AU - Tonelli, Marcello

AU - Vigod, Simone N

AU - Aceti, Franca

AU - Alvarado, Rubén

AU - Alvarado-Esquivel, Cosme

AU - Bakare, Muideen O

AU - Barnes, Jacqueline

AU - Beck, Cheryl Tatano

AU - Bindt, Carola

AU - Boyce, Philip M

AU - Bunevicius, Adomas

AU - Couto, Tiago Castro E

AU - Chaudron, Linda H

AU - Correa, Humberto

AU - de Figueiredo, Felipe Pinheiro

AU - Eapen, Valsamma

AU - Fernandes, Michelle

AU - Figueiredo, Barbara

AU - Fisher, Jane R W

AU - Garcia-Esteve, Lluïsa

AU - Giardinelli, Lisa

AU - Helle, Nadine

AU - Howard, Louise M

AU - Khalifa, Dina Sami

AU - Kohlhoff, Jane

AU - Kusminskas, Laima

AU - Kozinszky, Zoltán

AU - Lelli, Lorenzo

AU - Leonardou, Angeliki A

AU - Lewis, Beth A

AU - Maes, Michael

AU - Meuti, Valentina

AU - Nakić Radoš, Sandra

AU - Navarro García, Purificación

AU - Nishi, Daisuke

AU - Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono, Daniel

AU - Robertson-Blackmore, Emma

AU - Rochat, Tamsen J

AU - Rowe, Heather J

AU - Siu, Bonnie W M

AU - Skalkidou, Alkistis

AU - Stein, Alan

AU - Stewart, Robert C

AU - Su, Kuan-Pin

AU - Sundström-Poromaa, Inger

AU - Tadinac, Meri

AU - Tandon, S Darius

AU - Tendais, Iva

AU - Thiagayson, Pavaani

AU - Töreki, Annamária

AU - Torres-Giménez, Anna

AU - Tran, Thach D

AU - Trevillion, Kylee

AU - Turner, Katherine

AU - Vega-Dienstmaier, Johann M

AU - Wynter, Karen

AU - Yonkers, Kimberly A

AU - Benedetti, Andrea

AU - Thombs, Brett D

N1 - © 2019 The Authors. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - OBJECTIVES: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum.METHODS: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics.RESULTS: Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased.CONCLUSION: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.

AB - OBJECTIVES: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum.METHODS: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics.RESULTS: Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased.CONCLUSION: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.

U2 - 10.1002/mpr.1803

DO - 10.1002/mpr.1803

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 31568624

VL - 28

SP - e1803

JO - INT J METH PSYCH RES

JF - INT J METH PSYCH RES

SN - 1049-8931

IS - 4

ER -