[Comparison of leukocyte filters for erythrocyte concentration]
Standard
[Comparison of leukocyte filters for erythrocyte concentration]. / Hiller, Jens; Lubitz, B; Dominka, T; Kühnl, P.
in: Beitr Infusionsther Transfusionsmed, Jahrgang 32, 1994, S. 20-22.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - [Comparison of leukocyte filters for erythrocyte concentration]
AU - Hiller, Jens
AU - Lubitz, B
AU - Dominka, T
AU - Kühnl, P
PY - 1994
Y1 - 1994
N2 - We compared the following leukocyte filter blood systems (BBS): Biotrans Bio R01 Plus, Diamed Sepacell RS-200, Pall BPF4 (log 4 filters) and Biotrans Bio R01 (log 3 filter). We evaluated the leukocyte removal, handling, the increase of free hemoglobin and the loss of red blood cells (RBC) by filtration. A total of 54 buffy-coat-reduced RBCs were suspended in 200 ml PAGGS-M, stored at +4 degrees C for 24 h and filtered subsequently. Samples were taken before storage, immediately before and after filtration to measure total and free Hb and the white blood cell (WBC) contamination. RESULTS: (1) All log 4 filters showed a comparable reduction of the WBC content per RBC concentrate. (2) Differences were observed in total filtration time and loss of RBCs: Biotrans Bio R01 Plus and Pall BPF4 yielded significantly better results than Diamed Sepacell RS-200. (3) The log 3 filter did not meet the criteria of <5 x 10(6) WBCs per filtered unit of RBCs (as recommended by the Council of Europe).
AB - We compared the following leukocyte filter blood systems (BBS): Biotrans Bio R01 Plus, Diamed Sepacell RS-200, Pall BPF4 (log 4 filters) and Biotrans Bio R01 (log 3 filter). We evaluated the leukocyte removal, handling, the increase of free hemoglobin and the loss of red blood cells (RBC) by filtration. A total of 54 buffy-coat-reduced RBCs were suspended in 200 ml PAGGS-M, stored at +4 degrees C for 24 h and filtered subsequently. Samples were taken before storage, immediately before and after filtration to measure total and free Hb and the white blood cell (WBC) contamination. RESULTS: (1) All log 4 filters showed a comparable reduction of the WBC content per RBC concentrate. (2) Differences were observed in total filtration time and loss of RBCs: Biotrans Bio R01 Plus and Pall BPF4 yielded significantly better results than Diamed Sepacell RS-200. (3) The log 3 filter did not meet the criteria of <5 x 10(6) WBCs per filtered unit of RBCs (as recommended by the Council of Europe).
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
VL - 32
SP - 20
EP - 22
ER -
