[Comparison of HLA typing and retyping data in patients with bone marrow transplantation]

Standard

[Comparison of HLA typing and retyping data in patients with bone marrow transplantation]. / Wölpl, A; Fischer, M; Eiermann, Thomas; Goldmann, S F.

in: Beitr Infusionsther Transfusionsmed, Jahrgang 32, 1994, S. 266-269.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Wölpl, A, Fischer, M, Eiermann, T & Goldmann, SF 1994, '[Comparison of HLA typing and retyping data in patients with bone marrow transplantation]', Beitr Infusionsther Transfusionsmed, Jg. 32, S. 266-269. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9480105?dopt=Citation>

APA

Wölpl, A., Fischer, M., Eiermann, T., & Goldmann, S. F. (1994). [Comparison of HLA typing and retyping data in patients with bone marrow transplantation]. Beitr Infusionsther Transfusionsmed, 32, 266-269. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9480105?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Wölpl A, Fischer M, Eiermann T, Goldmann SF. [Comparison of HLA typing and retyping data in patients with bone marrow transplantation]. Beitr Infusionsther Transfusionsmed. 1994;32:266-269.

Bibtex

@article{179c22522b044ff3af9f45a791f3b89e,
title = "[Comparison of HLA typing and retyping data in patients with bone marrow transplantation]",
abstract = "Comparing HLA data from 851 patients with serological HLA-A, -B, -DR and/or PCR-SSO HLA-DRB, -DQB reevaluated HLA types produced 107 (12.5%) different results. The high discrepancy of HLA data from patients confirm the demand for a serological HLA-A, -B and a DNA HLA-DRB, -DQB reevaluation before starting an unrelated donor search for bone marrow transplantation. The reliability of serological HLA-DRB, -DQB typing was evaluated as 97.8%, whereas DNA HLA-DRB, -DQB typing was 99.5%.",
author = "A W{\"o}lpl and M Fischer and Thomas Eiermann and Goldmann, {S F}",
year = "1994",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "32",
pages = "266--269",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - [Comparison of HLA typing and retyping data in patients with bone marrow transplantation]

AU - Wölpl, A

AU - Fischer, M

AU - Eiermann, Thomas

AU - Goldmann, S F

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Comparing HLA data from 851 patients with serological HLA-A, -B, -DR and/or PCR-SSO HLA-DRB, -DQB reevaluated HLA types produced 107 (12.5%) different results. The high discrepancy of HLA data from patients confirm the demand for a serological HLA-A, -B and a DNA HLA-DRB, -DQB reevaluation before starting an unrelated donor search for bone marrow transplantation. The reliability of serological HLA-DRB, -DQB typing was evaluated as 97.8%, whereas DNA HLA-DRB, -DQB typing was 99.5%.

AB - Comparing HLA data from 851 patients with serological HLA-A, -B, -DR and/or PCR-SSO HLA-DRB, -DQB reevaluated HLA types produced 107 (12.5%) different results. The high discrepancy of HLA data from patients confirm the demand for a serological HLA-A, -B and a DNA HLA-DRB, -DQB reevaluation before starting an unrelated donor search for bone marrow transplantation. The reliability of serological HLA-DRB, -DQB typing was evaluated as 97.8%, whereas DNA HLA-DRB, -DQB typing was 99.5%.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 32

SP - 266

EP - 269

ER -