[Comparison of HLA typing and retyping data in patients with bone marrow transplantation]
Standard
[Comparison of HLA typing and retyping data in patients with bone marrow transplantation]. / Wölpl, A; Fischer, M; Eiermann, Thomas; Goldmann, S F.
in: Beitr Infusionsther Transfusionsmed, Jahrgang 32, 1994, S. 266-269.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - [Comparison of HLA typing and retyping data in patients with bone marrow transplantation]
AU - Wölpl, A
AU - Fischer, M
AU - Eiermann, Thomas
AU - Goldmann, S F
PY - 1994
Y1 - 1994
N2 - Comparing HLA data from 851 patients with serological HLA-A, -B, -DR and/or PCR-SSO HLA-DRB, -DQB reevaluated HLA types produced 107 (12.5%) different results. The high discrepancy of HLA data from patients confirm the demand for a serological HLA-A, -B and a DNA HLA-DRB, -DQB reevaluation before starting an unrelated donor search for bone marrow transplantation. The reliability of serological HLA-DRB, -DQB typing was evaluated as 97.8%, whereas DNA HLA-DRB, -DQB typing was 99.5%.
AB - Comparing HLA data from 851 patients with serological HLA-A, -B, -DR and/or PCR-SSO HLA-DRB, -DQB reevaluated HLA types produced 107 (12.5%) different results. The high discrepancy of HLA data from patients confirm the demand for a serological HLA-A, -B and a DNA HLA-DRB, -DQB reevaluation before starting an unrelated donor search for bone marrow transplantation. The reliability of serological HLA-DRB, -DQB typing was evaluated as 97.8%, whereas DNA HLA-DRB, -DQB typing was 99.5%.
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
VL - 32
SP - 266
EP - 269
ER -