Comparison of B-Mode with B-Flow Sonography for the Evaluation of Femoral Arteries in Infants

Standard

Comparison of B-Mode with B-Flow Sonography for the Evaluation of Femoral Arteries in Infants. / Groth, Michael; Dammann, Elena; Arndt, Florian; Ernst, Marielle; Herrmann, Jochen.

in: ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG, Jahrgang 189, Nr. 12, 12.2017, S. 1161-1167.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{174617d2fbef463092f3dac7558d743a,
title = "Comparison of B-Mode with B-Flow Sonography for the Evaluation of Femoral Arteries in Infants",
abstract = "Purpose To evaluate femoral arteries (FAs) in infants in the context of catheter angiography with B-mode (BMS) and B-flow sonography (BFS) and to compare both methods for vessel delineation and reliability of vessel diameter measurements. Methods 21 consecutive infants who underwent ultrasound for the evaluation of FAs before or after cardiac catheterization were retrospectively included in this study. The diameter of the FAs and the maximum length of the vessel section displayed on a single ultrasound plane were recorded by two radiologists for BMS and BFS. The visual image quality was rated by one observer. Statistics included intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, Fisher´s exact test and t-test. Results The intraobserver as well as interobserver correlation was excellent for BMS (0.7922 and 0.6521) and BFS (0.8094 and 0.7637). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed limits of agreement for BMS between +/-0.73 mm (intraobserver) and +/-0.55 mm (interobserver) and for BFS between +/-0.83 mm (intraobserver) and +/-0.7 mm (interobserver). BFS allowed visualization of a longer stretch of the FA than BMS (length 3.54 +/-0.85 vs. 2.21 +/-0.9 cm, p < 0.0001). The image quality was significantly higher for BFS (p = 0.0043). Conclusion Since BFS shows excellent reproducibility for vessel measurements and superior image quality in infants, if available, BFS should be included in standard protocols when realistic measurements are required. Key Points  · B-flow sonography offers high image quality for the evaluation of femoral arteries.. · Femoral artery diameter measurements performed with B-flow sonography show excellent reproducibility.. · If available, additional B-flow sonography of femoral arteries in infants is recommended.. Citation Format · Groth M, Dammann E, Arndt F et al. Comparison of B-Mode with B-Flow Sonography for the Evaluation of Femoral Arteries in Infants. Fortschr R{\"o}ntgenstr 2017; DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-112249.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Michael Groth and Elena Dammann and Florian Arndt and Marielle Ernst and Jochen Herrmann",
note = "{\textcopyright} Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1055/s-0043-112249",
language = "English",
volume = "189",
pages = "1161--1167",
journal = "ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG",
issn = "1438-9029",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag KG",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of B-Mode with B-Flow Sonography for the Evaluation of Femoral Arteries in Infants

AU - Groth, Michael

AU - Dammann, Elena

AU - Arndt, Florian

AU - Ernst, Marielle

AU - Herrmann, Jochen

N1 - © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - Purpose To evaluate femoral arteries (FAs) in infants in the context of catheter angiography with B-mode (BMS) and B-flow sonography (BFS) and to compare both methods for vessel delineation and reliability of vessel diameter measurements. Methods 21 consecutive infants who underwent ultrasound for the evaluation of FAs before or after cardiac catheterization were retrospectively included in this study. The diameter of the FAs and the maximum length of the vessel section displayed on a single ultrasound plane were recorded by two radiologists for BMS and BFS. The visual image quality was rated by one observer. Statistics included intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, Fisher´s exact test and t-test. Results The intraobserver as well as interobserver correlation was excellent for BMS (0.7922 and 0.6521) and BFS (0.8094 and 0.7637). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed limits of agreement for BMS between +/-0.73 mm (intraobserver) and +/-0.55 mm (interobserver) and for BFS between +/-0.83 mm (intraobserver) and +/-0.7 mm (interobserver). BFS allowed visualization of a longer stretch of the FA than BMS (length 3.54 +/-0.85 vs. 2.21 +/-0.9 cm, p < 0.0001). The image quality was significantly higher for BFS (p = 0.0043). Conclusion Since BFS shows excellent reproducibility for vessel measurements and superior image quality in infants, if available, BFS should be included in standard protocols when realistic measurements are required. Key Points  · B-flow sonography offers high image quality for the evaluation of femoral arteries.. · Femoral artery diameter measurements performed with B-flow sonography show excellent reproducibility.. · If available, additional B-flow sonography of femoral arteries in infants is recommended.. Citation Format · Groth M, Dammann E, Arndt F et al. Comparison of B-Mode with B-Flow Sonography for the Evaluation of Femoral Arteries in Infants. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-112249.

AB - Purpose To evaluate femoral arteries (FAs) in infants in the context of catheter angiography with B-mode (BMS) and B-flow sonography (BFS) and to compare both methods for vessel delineation and reliability of vessel diameter measurements. Methods 21 consecutive infants who underwent ultrasound for the evaluation of FAs before or after cardiac catheterization were retrospectively included in this study. The diameter of the FAs and the maximum length of the vessel section displayed on a single ultrasound plane were recorded by two radiologists for BMS and BFS. The visual image quality was rated by one observer. Statistics included intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, Fisher´s exact test and t-test. Results The intraobserver as well as interobserver correlation was excellent for BMS (0.7922 and 0.6521) and BFS (0.8094 and 0.7637). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed limits of agreement for BMS between +/-0.73 mm (intraobserver) and +/-0.55 mm (interobserver) and for BFS between +/-0.83 mm (intraobserver) and +/-0.7 mm (interobserver). BFS allowed visualization of a longer stretch of the FA than BMS (length 3.54 +/-0.85 vs. 2.21 +/-0.9 cm, p < 0.0001). The image quality was significantly higher for BFS (p = 0.0043). Conclusion Since BFS shows excellent reproducibility for vessel measurements and superior image quality in infants, if available, BFS should be included in standard protocols when realistic measurements are required. Key Points  · B-flow sonography offers high image quality for the evaluation of femoral arteries.. · Femoral artery diameter measurements performed with B-flow sonography show excellent reproducibility.. · If available, additional B-flow sonography of femoral arteries in infants is recommended.. Citation Format · Groth M, Dammann E, Arndt F et al. Comparison of B-Mode with B-Flow Sonography for the Evaluation of Femoral Arteries in Infants. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-112249.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1055/s-0043-112249

DO - 10.1055/s-0043-112249

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28683505

VL - 189

SP - 1161

EP - 1167

JO - ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG

JF - ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG

SN - 1438-9029

IS - 12

ER -