Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery

Standard

Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery. / Engelhardt, Alexander; Kanawade, Rajesh; Knipfer, Christian; Schmid, Matthias; Stelzle, Florian; Adler, Werner.

in: BMC MED RES METHODOL, Jahrgang 14, 16.07.2014, S. 91.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{1688707fc3054fe18712b8dc5206673c,
title = "Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: In the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, newly developed laser scalpels have multiple advantages over traditional metal scalpels. However, they lack haptic feedback. This is dangerous near e.g. nerve tissue, which has to be preserved during surgery. One solution to this problem is to train an algorithm that analyzes the reflected light spectra during surgery and can classify these spectra into different tissue types, in order to ultimately send a warning or temporarily switch off the laser when critical tissue is about to be ablated. Various machine learning algorithms are available for this task, but a detailed analysis is needed to assess the most appropriate algorithm.METHODS: In this study, a small data set is used to simulate many larger data sets according to a multivariate Gaussian distribution. Various machine learning algorithms are then trained and evaluated on these data sets. The algorithms' performance is subsequently evaluated and compared by averaged confusion matrices and ultimately by boxplots of misclassification rates. The results are validated on the smaller, experimental data set.RESULTS: Most classifiers have a median misclassification rate below 0.25 in the simulated data. The most notable performance was observed for the Penalized Discriminant Analysis, with a misclassifiaction rate of 0.00 in the simulated data, and an average misclassification rate of 0.02 in a 10-fold cross validation on the original data.CONCLUSION: The results suggest a Penalized Discriminant Analysis is the most promising approach, most probably because it considers the functional, correlated nature of the reflectance spectra.The results of this study improve the accuracy of real-time tissue discrimination and are an essential step towards improving the safety of oral laser surgery.",
keywords = "Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Discriminant Analysis, Facial Nerve Injuries, Feedback, Humans, Laser Therapy, Nerve Tissue, Optical Imaging, Principal Component Analysis, Spectrum Analysis, Surgery, Oral, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",
author = "Alexander Engelhardt and Rajesh Kanawade and Christian Knipfer and Matthias Schmid and Florian Stelzle and Werner Adler",
year = "2014",
month = jul,
day = "16",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2288-14-91",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "91",
journal = "BMC MED RES METHODOL",
issn = "1471-2288",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery

AU - Engelhardt, Alexander

AU - Kanawade, Rajesh

AU - Knipfer, Christian

AU - Schmid, Matthias

AU - Stelzle, Florian

AU - Adler, Werner

PY - 2014/7/16

Y1 - 2014/7/16

N2 - BACKGROUND: In the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, newly developed laser scalpels have multiple advantages over traditional metal scalpels. However, they lack haptic feedback. This is dangerous near e.g. nerve tissue, which has to be preserved during surgery. One solution to this problem is to train an algorithm that analyzes the reflected light spectra during surgery and can classify these spectra into different tissue types, in order to ultimately send a warning or temporarily switch off the laser when critical tissue is about to be ablated. Various machine learning algorithms are available for this task, but a detailed analysis is needed to assess the most appropriate algorithm.METHODS: In this study, a small data set is used to simulate many larger data sets according to a multivariate Gaussian distribution. Various machine learning algorithms are then trained and evaluated on these data sets. The algorithms' performance is subsequently evaluated and compared by averaged confusion matrices and ultimately by boxplots of misclassification rates. The results are validated on the smaller, experimental data set.RESULTS: Most classifiers have a median misclassification rate below 0.25 in the simulated data. The most notable performance was observed for the Penalized Discriminant Analysis, with a misclassifiaction rate of 0.00 in the simulated data, and an average misclassification rate of 0.02 in a 10-fold cross validation on the original data.CONCLUSION: The results suggest a Penalized Discriminant Analysis is the most promising approach, most probably because it considers the functional, correlated nature of the reflectance spectra.The results of this study improve the accuracy of real-time tissue discrimination and are an essential step towards improving the safety of oral laser surgery.

AB - BACKGROUND: In the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, newly developed laser scalpels have multiple advantages over traditional metal scalpels. However, they lack haptic feedback. This is dangerous near e.g. nerve tissue, which has to be preserved during surgery. One solution to this problem is to train an algorithm that analyzes the reflected light spectra during surgery and can classify these spectra into different tissue types, in order to ultimately send a warning or temporarily switch off the laser when critical tissue is about to be ablated. Various machine learning algorithms are available for this task, but a detailed analysis is needed to assess the most appropriate algorithm.METHODS: In this study, a small data set is used to simulate many larger data sets according to a multivariate Gaussian distribution. Various machine learning algorithms are then trained and evaluated on these data sets. The algorithms' performance is subsequently evaluated and compared by averaged confusion matrices and ultimately by boxplots of misclassification rates. The results are validated on the smaller, experimental data set.RESULTS: Most classifiers have a median misclassification rate below 0.25 in the simulated data. The most notable performance was observed for the Penalized Discriminant Analysis, with a misclassifiaction rate of 0.00 in the simulated data, and an average misclassification rate of 0.02 in a 10-fold cross validation on the original data.CONCLUSION: The results suggest a Penalized Discriminant Analysis is the most promising approach, most probably because it considers the functional, correlated nature of the reflectance spectra.The results of this study improve the accuracy of real-time tissue discrimination and are an essential step towards improving the safety of oral laser surgery.

KW - Algorithms

KW - Artificial Intelligence

KW - Computer Simulation

KW - Discriminant Analysis

KW - Facial Nerve Injuries

KW - Feedback

KW - Humans

KW - Laser Therapy

KW - Nerve Tissue

KW - Optical Imaging

KW - Principal Component Analysis

KW - Spectrum Analysis

KW - Surgery, Oral

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2288-14-91

DO - 10.1186/1471-2288-14-91

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25030085

VL - 14

SP - 91

JO - BMC MED RES METHODOL

JF - BMC MED RES METHODOL

SN - 1471-2288

ER -