Circulating free DNA integrity and concentration as independent prognostic markers in metastatic breast cancer

Standard

Circulating free DNA integrity and concentration as independent prognostic markers in metastatic breast cancer. / Cheng, Jie; Holland-Letz, Tim; Wallwiener, Markus; Surowy, Harald; Cuk, Katarina; Schott, Sarah; Trumpp, Andreas; Pantel, Klaus; Sohn, Christof; Schneeweiss, Andreas; Burwinkel, Barbara.

in: BREAST CANCER RES TR, Jahrgang 169, Nr. 1, 05.2018, S. 69-82.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Cheng, J, Holland-Letz, T, Wallwiener, M, Surowy, H, Cuk, K, Schott, S, Trumpp, A, Pantel, K, Sohn, C, Schneeweiss, A & Burwinkel, B 2018, 'Circulating free DNA integrity and concentration as independent prognostic markers in metastatic breast cancer', BREAST CANCER RES TR, Jg. 169, Nr. 1, S. 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4666-5

APA

Cheng, J., Holland-Letz, T., Wallwiener, M., Surowy, H., Cuk, K., Schott, S., Trumpp, A., Pantel, K., Sohn, C., Schneeweiss, A., & Burwinkel, B. (2018). Circulating free DNA integrity and concentration as independent prognostic markers in metastatic breast cancer. BREAST CANCER RES TR, 169(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4666-5

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{9704ab19787d47aaa693f82288b2e21f,
title = "Circulating free DNA integrity and concentration as independent prognostic markers in metastatic breast cancer",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Non-invasive blood-based molecular markers have been investigated for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Circulating free or cell-free DNA (cfDNA) variables have been shown to be putative markers in breast cancer prognosis.METHODS: Here, we investigated the potential prognostic ability of cfDNA concentration and cfDNA integrity (cfDI) in a study cohort of 268 patients by quantitative PCR. We compared cfDNA concentration and cfDI at baseline and after one cycle of therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.RESULTS: A significantly increased cfDI (P = 1.21E-7 for ALU and P = 1.87E-3 for LINE1) and decreased cfDNA concentration (P = 1.17E-3 for ALU and P = 1.60E-2 for LINE1) in both repetitive DNA elements after one cycle of therapy was observed. A multiple Cox regression model indicated that cfDI and cfDNA concentration can serve as independent prognostic markers in patients at baseline with HR (95% CI) of 0.70 (0.48-1.01) for ALU cfDI, 0.63 (0.44-0.92) for LINE1 cfDI, 2.44 (1.68-3.53) for ALU cfDNA concentration, and 2.12 (1.47-3.06) for LINE1 cfDNA concentration and after one cycle of therapy with HR (95% CI) of 0.59 (0.42-0.84) for ALU cfDI, 0.51 (0.36-0.74) for LINE1 cfDI, 1.59 (1.31-1.92) for ALU cfDNA concentration, and 1.30 (1.17-1.45) for LINE1 cfDNA concentration, respectively. By comparing integrated prediction error of different models, cfDNA variables were shown to improve the prognostic power of the CTC status.CONCLUSIONS: We hereby show that cfDNA variables, especially in combination with other markers, can serve as attractive prognostic markers for MBC patients at baseline and during the systematic therapy.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Jie Cheng and Tim Holland-Letz and Markus Wallwiener and Harald Surowy and Katarina Cuk and Sarah Schott and Andreas Trumpp and Klaus Pantel and Christof Sohn and Andreas Schneeweiss and Barbara Burwinkel",
year = "2018",
month = may,
doi = "10.1007/s10549-018-4666-5",
language = "English",
volume = "169",
pages = "69--82",
journal = "BREAST CANCER RES TR",
issn = "0167-6806",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Circulating free DNA integrity and concentration as independent prognostic markers in metastatic breast cancer

AU - Cheng, Jie

AU - Holland-Letz, Tim

AU - Wallwiener, Markus

AU - Surowy, Harald

AU - Cuk, Katarina

AU - Schott, Sarah

AU - Trumpp, Andreas

AU - Pantel, Klaus

AU - Sohn, Christof

AU - Schneeweiss, Andreas

AU - Burwinkel, Barbara

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - PURPOSE: Non-invasive blood-based molecular markers have been investigated for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Circulating free or cell-free DNA (cfDNA) variables have been shown to be putative markers in breast cancer prognosis.METHODS: Here, we investigated the potential prognostic ability of cfDNA concentration and cfDNA integrity (cfDI) in a study cohort of 268 patients by quantitative PCR. We compared cfDNA concentration and cfDI at baseline and after one cycle of therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.RESULTS: A significantly increased cfDI (P = 1.21E-7 for ALU and P = 1.87E-3 for LINE1) and decreased cfDNA concentration (P = 1.17E-3 for ALU and P = 1.60E-2 for LINE1) in both repetitive DNA elements after one cycle of therapy was observed. A multiple Cox regression model indicated that cfDI and cfDNA concentration can serve as independent prognostic markers in patients at baseline with HR (95% CI) of 0.70 (0.48-1.01) for ALU cfDI, 0.63 (0.44-0.92) for LINE1 cfDI, 2.44 (1.68-3.53) for ALU cfDNA concentration, and 2.12 (1.47-3.06) for LINE1 cfDNA concentration and after one cycle of therapy with HR (95% CI) of 0.59 (0.42-0.84) for ALU cfDI, 0.51 (0.36-0.74) for LINE1 cfDI, 1.59 (1.31-1.92) for ALU cfDNA concentration, and 1.30 (1.17-1.45) for LINE1 cfDNA concentration, respectively. By comparing integrated prediction error of different models, cfDNA variables were shown to improve the prognostic power of the CTC status.CONCLUSIONS: We hereby show that cfDNA variables, especially in combination with other markers, can serve as attractive prognostic markers for MBC patients at baseline and during the systematic therapy.

AB - PURPOSE: Non-invasive blood-based molecular markers have been investigated for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Circulating free or cell-free DNA (cfDNA) variables have been shown to be putative markers in breast cancer prognosis.METHODS: Here, we investigated the potential prognostic ability of cfDNA concentration and cfDNA integrity (cfDI) in a study cohort of 268 patients by quantitative PCR. We compared cfDNA concentration and cfDI at baseline and after one cycle of therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.RESULTS: A significantly increased cfDI (P = 1.21E-7 for ALU and P = 1.87E-3 for LINE1) and decreased cfDNA concentration (P = 1.17E-3 for ALU and P = 1.60E-2 for LINE1) in both repetitive DNA elements after one cycle of therapy was observed. A multiple Cox regression model indicated that cfDI and cfDNA concentration can serve as independent prognostic markers in patients at baseline with HR (95% CI) of 0.70 (0.48-1.01) for ALU cfDI, 0.63 (0.44-0.92) for LINE1 cfDI, 2.44 (1.68-3.53) for ALU cfDNA concentration, and 2.12 (1.47-3.06) for LINE1 cfDNA concentration and after one cycle of therapy with HR (95% CI) of 0.59 (0.42-0.84) for ALU cfDI, 0.51 (0.36-0.74) for LINE1 cfDI, 1.59 (1.31-1.92) for ALU cfDNA concentration, and 1.30 (1.17-1.45) for LINE1 cfDNA concentration, respectively. By comparing integrated prediction error of different models, cfDNA variables were shown to improve the prognostic power of the CTC status.CONCLUSIONS: We hereby show that cfDNA variables, especially in combination with other markers, can serve as attractive prognostic markers for MBC patients at baseline and during the systematic therapy.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1007/s10549-018-4666-5

DO - 10.1007/s10549-018-4666-5

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 29340881

VL - 169

SP - 69

EP - 82

JO - BREAST CANCER RES TR

JF - BREAST CANCER RES TR

SN - 0167-6806

IS - 1

ER -