PortalPublikationenChild-focused maternal mentalization: A systematic review of...

Child-focused maternal mentalization: A systematic review of measurement tools from birth to three

Standard

Child-focused maternal mentalization: A systematic review of measurement tools from birth to three. / Schiborr, Julia; Lotzin, Annett; Romer, Georg; Schulte-Markwort, Michael; Ramsauer, Brigitte.

in: MEASUREMENT, 2013.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Schiborr, J, Lotzin, A, Romer, G, Schulte-Markwort, M & Ramsauer, B 2013, 'Child-focused maternal mentalization: A systematic review of measurement tools from birth to three', MEASUREMENT. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.05.007

APA

Schiborr, J., Lotzin, A., Romer, G., Schulte-Markwort, M., & Ramsauer, B. (2013). Child-focused maternal mentalization: A systematic review of measurement tools from birth to three. MEASUREMENT. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.05.007

Vancouver

Schiborr J, Lotzin A, Romer G, Schulte-Markwort M, Ramsauer B. Child-focused maternal mentalization: A systematic review of measurement tools from birth to three. MEASUREMENT. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.05.007

Bibtex

@article{48e73b9973b24ca38692abb82910d841,
title = "Child-focused maternal mentalization: A systematic review of measurement tools from birth to three",
abstract = "Although the relevance of the concept of maternal mentalization is widely accepted in thefield of attachment and theory of mind research and practice, to date no systematic reviewof measurement tools capturing the concept exists. The present review addresses this lackby systematically searching and summarizing available instruments and providing adetailed content description. Instruments were identified by searching electronic databasesas well as employing additional search strategies. The number of identified instrumentswas n = 15. In summary the instruments can be classified in interview andobservational tools. To date no questionnaire exists capturing the concept. Tools varygreatly in theoretical foundation, psychometric evaluation, availability, and specific contentdomains.",
author = "Julia Schiborr and Annett Lotzin and Georg Romer and Michael Schulte-Markwort and Brigitte Ramsauer",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.measurement.2013.05.007",
language = "English",
journal = "MEASUREMENT",
issn = "0263-2241",
publisher = "ELSEVIER SCI LTD",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Child-focused maternal mentalization: A systematic review of measurement tools from birth to three

AU - Schiborr, Julia

AU - Lotzin, Annett

AU - Romer, Georg

AU - Schulte-Markwort, Michael

AU - Ramsauer, Brigitte

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Although the relevance of the concept of maternal mentalization is widely accepted in thefield of attachment and theory of mind research and practice, to date no systematic reviewof measurement tools capturing the concept exists. The present review addresses this lackby systematically searching and summarizing available instruments and providing adetailed content description. Instruments were identified by searching electronic databasesas well as employing additional search strategies. The number of identified instrumentswas n = 15. In summary the instruments can be classified in interview andobservational tools. To date no questionnaire exists capturing the concept. Tools varygreatly in theoretical foundation, psychometric evaluation, availability, and specific contentdomains.

AB - Although the relevance of the concept of maternal mentalization is widely accepted in thefield of attachment and theory of mind research and practice, to date no systematic reviewof measurement tools capturing the concept exists. The present review addresses this lackby systematically searching and summarizing available instruments and providing adetailed content description. Instruments were identified by searching electronic databasesas well as employing additional search strategies. The number of identified instrumentswas n = 15. In summary the instruments can be classified in interview andobservational tools. To date no questionnaire exists capturing the concept. Tools varygreatly in theoretical foundation, psychometric evaluation, availability, and specific contentdomains.

U2 - 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.05.007

DO - 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.05.007

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

JO - MEASUREMENT

JF - MEASUREMENT

SN - 0263-2241

ER -