Changes in Processing Speed, Cognitive Flexibility, and Selective Attention over a Four-Week Treatment Period in Inpatients with Moderate to Severe Depression

Standard

Changes in Processing Speed, Cognitive Flexibility, and Selective Attention over a Four-Week Treatment Period in Inpatients with Moderate to Severe Depression. / Schneider, Brooke C.; Diedrich, Sabrina; Hauschildt, Marit; Biedermann, Sarah V.; Arlt, Sönke; Moritz, Steffen; Jelinek, Lena.

in: Z NEUROPSYCHOL, Jahrgang 32, Nr. 3, 09.2021, S. 129-140.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{89c5abec27d34232851073e10c8ad27a,
title = "Changes in Processing Speed, Cognitive Flexibility, and Selective Attention over a Four-Week Treatment Period in Inpatients with Moderate to Severe Depression",
abstract = "Cognitive dysfunction among individuals with depression is associated with reduced functional status, and cognitive improvement is often an important treatment goal. We compared changes in cognitive performance over four weeks among 45 inpatients with a unipolar depress-sive disorder completing inpatient treatment to that of 20 controls on measures of processing speed and set-shifting (Trail Making Test), as well as selective attention (Test d2). In the patients, depressive symptoms improved signifi cantly and with a large effect over the treatment period (d = 1.22-1.81). Among the three cognitive domains examined, the most pronounced reductions among patients compared to controls were observed in cognitive fl exibility (Group effect: ηp2 = .04). The effect of Group; however, was not signifi cant. Likewise, there were no signifi cant improvements in cognitive fl exibility over time, and changes in cognitive fl exibility over the four-week period did not differ between the two groups (Group x Time interaction). Performances in selective attention and processing speed improved over the four-week period, though neither the effect of Group nor the interaction (Group x Time) was signifi cant regarding these performances. Change in cognitive performance was not associated with changes in symptom severity (incl. remission status). Taken together, the signifi cant improvements in selective attention and processing speed were largely attributable to practice effects. Our fi ndings lend further support to the notion that cognitive fl exibility, selective attention, and processing speed are independent of improvements in depressive symptoms. This study underscores the importance of including comparison groups to control for practice effects when examining cognitive change, and providing treatments specifi cally aimed at improving cognitive symptoms.",
keywords = "cognitive functioning, depression, executive functioning, processing speed, selective attention",
author = "Schneider, {Brooke C.} and Sabrina Diedrich and Marit Hauschildt and Biedermann, {Sarah V.} and S{\"o}nke Arlt and Steffen Moritz and Lena Jelinek",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Hogrefe Publishing GmbH. All rights reserved.",
year = "2021",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1024/1016-264X/a000330",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "129--140",
journal = "Z NEUROPSYCHOL",
issn = "1016-264X",
publisher = "Hans Huber",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changes in Processing Speed, Cognitive Flexibility, and Selective Attention over a Four-Week Treatment Period in Inpatients with Moderate to Severe Depression

AU - Schneider, Brooke C.

AU - Diedrich, Sabrina

AU - Hauschildt, Marit

AU - Biedermann, Sarah V.

AU - Arlt, Sönke

AU - Moritz, Steffen

AU - Jelinek, Lena

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Hogrefe Publishing GmbH. All rights reserved.

PY - 2021/9

Y1 - 2021/9

N2 - Cognitive dysfunction among individuals with depression is associated with reduced functional status, and cognitive improvement is often an important treatment goal. We compared changes in cognitive performance over four weeks among 45 inpatients with a unipolar depress-sive disorder completing inpatient treatment to that of 20 controls on measures of processing speed and set-shifting (Trail Making Test), as well as selective attention (Test d2). In the patients, depressive symptoms improved signifi cantly and with a large effect over the treatment period (d = 1.22-1.81). Among the three cognitive domains examined, the most pronounced reductions among patients compared to controls were observed in cognitive fl exibility (Group effect: ηp2 = .04). The effect of Group; however, was not signifi cant. Likewise, there were no signifi cant improvements in cognitive fl exibility over time, and changes in cognitive fl exibility over the four-week period did not differ between the two groups (Group x Time interaction). Performances in selective attention and processing speed improved over the four-week period, though neither the effect of Group nor the interaction (Group x Time) was signifi cant regarding these performances. Change in cognitive performance was not associated with changes in symptom severity (incl. remission status). Taken together, the signifi cant improvements in selective attention and processing speed were largely attributable to practice effects. Our fi ndings lend further support to the notion that cognitive fl exibility, selective attention, and processing speed are independent of improvements in depressive symptoms. This study underscores the importance of including comparison groups to control for practice effects when examining cognitive change, and providing treatments specifi cally aimed at improving cognitive symptoms.

AB - Cognitive dysfunction among individuals with depression is associated with reduced functional status, and cognitive improvement is often an important treatment goal. We compared changes in cognitive performance over four weeks among 45 inpatients with a unipolar depress-sive disorder completing inpatient treatment to that of 20 controls on measures of processing speed and set-shifting (Trail Making Test), as well as selective attention (Test d2). In the patients, depressive symptoms improved signifi cantly and with a large effect over the treatment period (d = 1.22-1.81). Among the three cognitive domains examined, the most pronounced reductions among patients compared to controls were observed in cognitive fl exibility (Group effect: ηp2 = .04). The effect of Group; however, was not signifi cant. Likewise, there were no signifi cant improvements in cognitive fl exibility over time, and changes in cognitive fl exibility over the four-week period did not differ between the two groups (Group x Time interaction). Performances in selective attention and processing speed improved over the four-week period, though neither the effect of Group nor the interaction (Group x Time) was signifi cant regarding these performances. Change in cognitive performance was not associated with changes in symptom severity (incl. remission status). Taken together, the signifi cant improvements in selective attention and processing speed were largely attributable to practice effects. Our fi ndings lend further support to the notion that cognitive fl exibility, selective attention, and processing speed are independent of improvements in depressive symptoms. This study underscores the importance of including comparison groups to control for practice effects when examining cognitive change, and providing treatments specifi cally aimed at improving cognitive symptoms.

KW - cognitive functioning

KW - depression

KW - executive functioning

KW - processing speed

KW - selective attention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114048029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1024/1016-264X/a000330

DO - 10.1024/1016-264X/a000330

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85114048029

VL - 32

SP - 129

EP - 140

JO - Z NEUROPSYCHOL

JF - Z NEUROPSYCHOL

SN - 1016-264X

IS - 3

ER -