Changes in depression stigma after the Germanwings crash - Findings from German population surveys.
Standard
Changes in depression stigma after the Germanwings crash - Findings from German population surveys. / von dem Knesebeck, Olaf; Mnich, Eva Elisabeth; Angermeyer, Mathias C; Kofahl, Christopher; Makowski, Anna Christin.
in: J AFFECT DISORDERS, Jahrgang 186, 31.07.2015, S. 261-265.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Changes in depression stigma after the Germanwings crash - Findings from German population surveys.
AU - von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
AU - Mnich, Eva Elisabeth
AU - Angermeyer, Mathias C
AU - Kofahl, Christopher
AU - Makowski, Anna Christin
PY - 2015/7/31
Y1 - 2015/7/31
N2 - BACKGROUND:Media coverage of the Germanwings plane crash intensely focused on the co-pilot's mental illness and was criticized for potentially increasing depression stigma. We explored whether stigma beliefs towards persons with depression changed in April 2015 (about one month after the crash) compared to 2014.METHOD:Telephone surveys among the adult population were conducted in Munich, Germany (N=650 in 2014 and N=601 in 2015). In both surveys, four components of stigma were assessed: (1) characteristics ascribed to persons with a depression, (2) belief in a continuum of symptoms from mental health to mental illness, (3) emotional reactions to people afflicted by depression (fear, anger, and pro-social reactions), and (4) desire for social distance.RESULTS:Some stigmatizing attitudes have increased after the crash. More specifically, we found more pronounced changes in the attributes ascribed (stereotypes) and in the perceived separation from persons afflicted (continuum beliefs) than in the emotional reactions and the desire for social distance. However, overall increase in depression stigma was smaller than expected as changes were not statistically significant in the majority of the analyzed items.LIMITATIONS:Due to the study design no causal interpretation of results is possible. Moreover, evidence presented is confined to a regional German sample.CONCLUSIONS:A single devastating event and related media coverage seem to have a limited impact on public stigmatizing attitudes.
AB - BACKGROUND:Media coverage of the Germanwings plane crash intensely focused on the co-pilot's mental illness and was criticized for potentially increasing depression stigma. We explored whether stigma beliefs towards persons with depression changed in April 2015 (about one month after the crash) compared to 2014.METHOD:Telephone surveys among the adult population were conducted in Munich, Germany (N=650 in 2014 and N=601 in 2015). In both surveys, four components of stigma were assessed: (1) characteristics ascribed to persons with a depression, (2) belief in a continuum of symptoms from mental health to mental illness, (3) emotional reactions to people afflicted by depression (fear, anger, and pro-social reactions), and (4) desire for social distance.RESULTS:Some stigmatizing attitudes have increased after the crash. More specifically, we found more pronounced changes in the attributes ascribed (stereotypes) and in the perceived separation from persons afflicted (continuum beliefs) than in the emotional reactions and the desire for social distance. However, overall increase in depression stigma was smaller than expected as changes were not statistically significant in the majority of the analyzed items.LIMITATIONS:Due to the study design no causal interpretation of results is possible. Moreover, evidence presented is confined to a regional German sample.CONCLUSIONS:A single devastating event and related media coverage seem to have a limited impact on public stigmatizing attitudes.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.029
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.029
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
VL - 186
SP - 261
EP - 265
JO - J AFFECT DISORDERS
JF - J AFFECT DISORDERS
SN - 0165-0327
ER -