Cerebral aneurysm pulsation: do iterative reconstruction methods improve measurement accuracy in vivo?
Standard
Cerebral aneurysm pulsation: do iterative reconstruction methods improve measurement accuracy in vivo? / Illies, T; Säring, D; Kinoshita, M; Fujinaka, T; Bester, M; Fiehler, J; Tomiyama, N; Watanabe, Y.
in: AM J NEURORADIOL, Jahrgang 35, Nr. 11, 2014, S. 2159-63.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Cerebral aneurysm pulsation: do iterative reconstruction methods improve measurement accuracy in vivo?
AU - Illies, T
AU - Säring, D
AU - Kinoshita, M
AU - Fujinaka, T
AU - Bester, M
AU - Fiehler, J
AU - Tomiyama, N
AU - Watanabe, Y
N1 - © 2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Electrocardiogram-gated 4D-CTA is a promising technique allowing new insight into aneurysm pathophysiology and possibly improving risk prediction of cerebral aneurysms. Due to the extremely small pulsational excursions (<0.1 mm in diameter), exact segmentation of the aneurysms is of critical importance. In vitro examinations have shown improvement of the accuracy of vessel delineation by iterative reconstruction methods. We hypothesized that this improvement shows a measurable effect on aneurysm pulsations in vivo.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with cerebral aneurysms underwent 4D-CTA. Images were reconstructed with filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction. The following parameters were compared between both groups: image noise, absolute aneurysm volumes, pulsatility, and sharpness of aneurysm edges.RESULTS: In iterative reconstruction images, noise was significantly reduced (mean, 9.8 ± 4.0 Hounsfield units versus 8.0 ± 2.5 Hounsfield units; P = .04), but the sharpness of aneurysm edges just missed statistical significance (mean, 3.50 ± 0.49 mm versus 3.42 ± 0.49 mm; P = .06). Absolute volumes (mean, 456.1 ± 775.2 mm(3) versus 461.7 ± 789.9 mm(3); P = .31) and pulsatility (mean, 1.099 ± 0.088 mm(3) versus 1.095 ± 0.082 mm(3); P = .62) did not show a significant difference between iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection images.CONCLUSIONS: CT images reconstructed with iterative reconstruction methods show a tendency toward shorter vessel edges but do not affect absolute aneurysm volumes or pulsatility measurements in vivo.
AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Electrocardiogram-gated 4D-CTA is a promising technique allowing new insight into aneurysm pathophysiology and possibly improving risk prediction of cerebral aneurysms. Due to the extremely small pulsational excursions (<0.1 mm in diameter), exact segmentation of the aneurysms is of critical importance. In vitro examinations have shown improvement of the accuracy of vessel delineation by iterative reconstruction methods. We hypothesized that this improvement shows a measurable effect on aneurysm pulsations in vivo.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with cerebral aneurysms underwent 4D-CTA. Images were reconstructed with filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction. The following parameters were compared between both groups: image noise, absolute aneurysm volumes, pulsatility, and sharpness of aneurysm edges.RESULTS: In iterative reconstruction images, noise was significantly reduced (mean, 9.8 ± 4.0 Hounsfield units versus 8.0 ± 2.5 Hounsfield units; P = .04), but the sharpness of aneurysm edges just missed statistical significance (mean, 3.50 ± 0.49 mm versus 3.42 ± 0.49 mm; P = .06). Absolute volumes (mean, 456.1 ± 775.2 mm(3) versus 461.7 ± 789.9 mm(3); P = .31) and pulsatility (mean, 1.099 ± 0.088 mm(3) versus 1.095 ± 0.082 mm(3); P = .62) did not show a significant difference between iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection images.CONCLUSIONS: CT images reconstructed with iterative reconstruction methods show a tendency toward shorter vessel edges but do not affect absolute aneurysm volumes or pulsatility measurements in vivo.
U2 - 10.3174/ajnr.A4000
DO - 10.3174/ajnr.A4000
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 24970550
VL - 35
SP - 2159
EP - 2163
JO - AM J NEURORADIOL
JF - AM J NEURORADIOL
SN - 0195-6108
IS - 11
ER -