Cellular drug resistance profiles in childhood acute myeloid leukemia: differences between FAB types and comparison with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Standard

Cellular drug resistance profiles in childhood acute myeloid leukemia: differences between FAB types and comparison with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. / Zwaan, C M; Kaspers, G J; Pieters, R; Ramakers-Van Woerden, N L; den Boer, M L; Wünsche, R; Rottier, M M; Hählen, K; van Wering, E R; Janka-Schaub, Gritta; Creutzig, U; Veerman, A J.

in: BLOOD, Jahrgang 96, Nr. 8, 8, 2000, S. 2879-2886.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Zwaan, CM, Kaspers, GJ, Pieters, R, Ramakers-Van Woerden, NL, den Boer, ML, Wünsche, R, Rottier, MM, Hählen, K, van Wering, ER, Janka-Schaub, G, Creutzig, U & Veerman, AJ 2000, 'Cellular drug resistance profiles in childhood acute myeloid leukemia: differences between FAB types and comparison with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.', BLOOD, Jg. 96, Nr. 8, 8, S. 2879-2886. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11023525?dopt=Citation>

APA

Zwaan, C. M., Kaspers, G. J., Pieters, R., Ramakers-Van Woerden, N. L., den Boer, M. L., Wünsche, R., Rottier, M. M., Hählen, K., van Wering, E. R., Janka-Schaub, G., Creutzig, U., & Veerman, A. J. (2000). Cellular drug resistance profiles in childhood acute myeloid leukemia: differences between FAB types and comparison with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. BLOOD, 96(8), 2879-2886. [8]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11023525?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Zwaan CM, Kaspers GJ, Pieters R, Ramakers-Van Woerden NL, den Boer ML, Wünsche R et al. Cellular drug resistance profiles in childhood acute myeloid leukemia: differences between FAB types and comparison with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. BLOOD. 2000;96(8):2879-2886. 8.

Bibtex

@article{2188dfe6548d4c40835e11cc0da47c7d,
title = "Cellular drug resistance profiles in childhood acute myeloid leukemia: differences between FAB types and comparison with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.",
abstract = "Determining in vitro drug resistance may reveal clinically relevant information in childhood leukemia. Using the methyl-thiazol-tetrazolium assay, the resistance of untreated leukemic cells to 21 drugs was compared in 128 children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 536 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The differences between 3 French-American-British (FAB) types (M1/M2, M4, and M5) were also compared. AML was significantly more resistant than ALL to the following drugs, as noted by the median resistance: glucocorticoids (greater than 85-fold), vincristine (4.4-fold), L-asparaginase (6.9-fold), anthracyclines (1.8- to 3.4-fold), mitoxantrone (2.6-fold), etoposide (4.9-fold), platinum analogues (2.4- to 3.4-fold), ifosfamide (3.5-fold), and thiotepa (3.9-fold). For cytarabine and thiopurines, the median LC50 values (the drug concentration that kills 5% of the cells) were equal. Also, busulfan, amsacrine, teniposide, and vindesine showed no significant differences, but the numbers were smaller, and the median LC50 values were 1.3- to 5.2-fold higher in AML. None of the drugs demonstrated greater cytotoxicity in AML. FAB M5 was significantly more sensitive than FAB M4 to most drugs frequently used in AML, as indicated by the following ratios of median sensitivities: the anthracyclines (2.6- to 3.2-fold), mitoxantrone (12.5-fold), etoposide (8.7-fold), and cytarabine (2.9-fold). For etoposide and cytarabine (5.4- and 3.4-fold, respectively) FAB M5 was also significantly more sensitive than FAB M1/M2. FAB M5 was equally sensitive to L-asparaginase and vincristine as ALL. Only 15% of the AML samples were {"}intermediately{"} sensitive to glucocorticoids, mainly in FAB M1/M2. The poorer prognosis of childhood AML is related to resistance to a large number of drugs. Within AML, FAB M5 had a distinct resistance pattern. These resistance profiles may be helpful in the rational design of further treatment protocols. (Blood. 2000;96:2879-2886)",
author = "Zwaan, {C M} and Kaspers, {G J} and R Pieters and {Ramakers-Van Woerden}, {N L} and {den Boer}, {M L} and R W{\"u}nsche and Rottier, {M M} and K H{\"a}hlen and {van Wering}, {E R} and Gritta Janka-Schaub and U Creutzig and Veerman, {A J}",
year = "2000",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "96",
pages = "2879--2886",
journal = "BLOOD",
issn = "0006-4971",
publisher = "American Society of Hematology",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cellular drug resistance profiles in childhood acute myeloid leukemia: differences between FAB types and comparison with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

AU - Zwaan, C M

AU - Kaspers, G J

AU - Pieters, R

AU - Ramakers-Van Woerden, N L

AU - den Boer, M L

AU - Wünsche, R

AU - Rottier, M M

AU - Hählen, K

AU - van Wering, E R

AU - Janka-Schaub, Gritta

AU - Creutzig, U

AU - Veerman, A J

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Determining in vitro drug resistance may reveal clinically relevant information in childhood leukemia. Using the methyl-thiazol-tetrazolium assay, the resistance of untreated leukemic cells to 21 drugs was compared in 128 children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 536 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The differences between 3 French-American-British (FAB) types (M1/M2, M4, and M5) were also compared. AML was significantly more resistant than ALL to the following drugs, as noted by the median resistance: glucocorticoids (greater than 85-fold), vincristine (4.4-fold), L-asparaginase (6.9-fold), anthracyclines (1.8- to 3.4-fold), mitoxantrone (2.6-fold), etoposide (4.9-fold), platinum analogues (2.4- to 3.4-fold), ifosfamide (3.5-fold), and thiotepa (3.9-fold). For cytarabine and thiopurines, the median LC50 values (the drug concentration that kills 5% of the cells) were equal. Also, busulfan, amsacrine, teniposide, and vindesine showed no significant differences, but the numbers were smaller, and the median LC50 values were 1.3- to 5.2-fold higher in AML. None of the drugs demonstrated greater cytotoxicity in AML. FAB M5 was significantly more sensitive than FAB M4 to most drugs frequently used in AML, as indicated by the following ratios of median sensitivities: the anthracyclines (2.6- to 3.2-fold), mitoxantrone (12.5-fold), etoposide (8.7-fold), and cytarabine (2.9-fold). For etoposide and cytarabine (5.4- and 3.4-fold, respectively) FAB M5 was also significantly more sensitive than FAB M1/M2. FAB M5 was equally sensitive to L-asparaginase and vincristine as ALL. Only 15% of the AML samples were "intermediately" sensitive to glucocorticoids, mainly in FAB M1/M2. The poorer prognosis of childhood AML is related to resistance to a large number of drugs. Within AML, FAB M5 had a distinct resistance pattern. These resistance profiles may be helpful in the rational design of further treatment protocols. (Blood. 2000;96:2879-2886)

AB - Determining in vitro drug resistance may reveal clinically relevant information in childhood leukemia. Using the methyl-thiazol-tetrazolium assay, the resistance of untreated leukemic cells to 21 drugs was compared in 128 children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 536 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The differences between 3 French-American-British (FAB) types (M1/M2, M4, and M5) were also compared. AML was significantly more resistant than ALL to the following drugs, as noted by the median resistance: glucocorticoids (greater than 85-fold), vincristine (4.4-fold), L-asparaginase (6.9-fold), anthracyclines (1.8- to 3.4-fold), mitoxantrone (2.6-fold), etoposide (4.9-fold), platinum analogues (2.4- to 3.4-fold), ifosfamide (3.5-fold), and thiotepa (3.9-fold). For cytarabine and thiopurines, the median LC50 values (the drug concentration that kills 5% of the cells) were equal. Also, busulfan, amsacrine, teniposide, and vindesine showed no significant differences, but the numbers were smaller, and the median LC50 values were 1.3- to 5.2-fold higher in AML. None of the drugs demonstrated greater cytotoxicity in AML. FAB M5 was significantly more sensitive than FAB M4 to most drugs frequently used in AML, as indicated by the following ratios of median sensitivities: the anthracyclines (2.6- to 3.2-fold), mitoxantrone (12.5-fold), etoposide (8.7-fold), and cytarabine (2.9-fold). For etoposide and cytarabine (5.4- and 3.4-fold, respectively) FAB M5 was also significantly more sensitive than FAB M1/M2. FAB M5 was equally sensitive to L-asparaginase and vincristine as ALL. Only 15% of the AML samples were "intermediately" sensitive to glucocorticoids, mainly in FAB M1/M2. The poorer prognosis of childhood AML is related to resistance to a large number of drugs. Within AML, FAB M5 had a distinct resistance pattern. These resistance profiles may be helpful in the rational design of further treatment protocols. (Blood. 2000;96:2879-2886)

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 96

SP - 2879

EP - 2886

JO - BLOOD

JF - BLOOD

SN - 0006-4971

IS - 8

M1 - 8

ER -