Cause of death distribution with InterVA and physician coding in a rural area of Burkina Faso

Standard

Cause of death distribution with InterVA and physician coding in a rural area of Burkina Faso. / Ramroth, Heribert; Lorenz, Eva; Rankin, Johanna C; Fottrell, Edward; Yé, Maurice; Neuhann, Florian; Ssennono, Mark; Sié, Ali; Byass, Peter; Becher, Heiko.

in: TROP MED INT HEALTH, Jahrgang 17, Nr. 7, 01.07.2012, S. 904-13.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Ramroth, H, Lorenz, E, Rankin, JC, Fottrell, E, Yé, M, Neuhann, F, Ssennono, M, Sié, A, Byass, P & Becher, H 2012, 'Cause of death distribution with InterVA and physician coding in a rural area of Burkina Faso', TROP MED INT HEALTH, Jg. 17, Nr. 7, S. 904-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.02998.x

APA

Ramroth, H., Lorenz, E., Rankin, J. C., Fottrell, E., Yé, M., Neuhann, F., Ssennono, M., Sié, A., Byass, P., & Becher, H. (2012). Cause of death distribution with InterVA and physician coding in a rural area of Burkina Faso. TROP MED INT HEALTH, 17(7), 904-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.02998.x

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e9cd0055f806438b945323bbcc4f1dc1,
title = "Cause of death distribution with InterVA and physician coding in a rural area of Burkina Faso",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To compare the cause of death distribution using the Physician Coded Verbal Autopsy approach versus the Interpreting Verbal Autopsy model, based on information from a French verbal autopsy questionnaire, in rural north-western Burkina Faso.METHODS: Data from 5649 verbal autopsy questionnaires reviewed by local physicians at the Nouna Health and Demographic Surveillance Site between 1998 and 2007 were considered for analyses. Information from VA interviews was extracted to create a set of standard indicators needed to run the Interpreting Verbal Autopsy model. Cause-specific mortality fractions were used to compare Physician Coded Verbal Autopsy and Interpreting Verbal Autopsy results.RESULTS: At the population level, 62.5% of causes of death using the Interpreting Verbal Autopsy model corresponded with those determined by two or three physicians. Although seven of the 10 main causes of death were present in both approaches, the comparison of percentages of single causes of death shows discrepancies, dominated by higher malaria rates found in the Physician Coded Verbal Autopsy approach.CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that national mortality statistics, which are partly based on verbal autopsies, must be carefully interpreted. Difficulties in determining malaria as cause of death in holoendemic malaria regions might result in higher discrepancies than those in non-endemic areas. As neither Physician Coded Verbal Autopsy nor Interpreting Verbal Autopsy results represent a gold standard, uncertainty levels with either procedure are high.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Autopsy, Burkina Faso, Cause of Death, Child, Child, Preschool, Clinical Coding, Female, Humans, Infant, Malaria, Male, Middle Aged, Physician's Practice Patterns, Physicians, Questionnaires, Rural Population, Young Adult",
author = "Heribert Ramroth and Eva Lorenz and Rankin, {Johanna C} and Edward Fottrell and Maurice Y{\'e} and Florian Neuhann and Mark Ssennono and Ali Si{\'e} and Peter Byass and Heiko Becher",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",
year = "2012",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.02998.x",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "904--13",
journal = "TROP MED INT HEALTH",
issn = "1360-2276",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cause of death distribution with InterVA and physician coding in a rural area of Burkina Faso

AU - Ramroth, Heribert

AU - Lorenz, Eva

AU - Rankin, Johanna C

AU - Fottrell, Edward

AU - Yé, Maurice

AU - Neuhann, Florian

AU - Ssennono, Mark

AU - Sié, Ali

AU - Byass, Peter

AU - Becher, Heiko

N1 - © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To compare the cause of death distribution using the Physician Coded Verbal Autopsy approach versus the Interpreting Verbal Autopsy model, based on information from a French verbal autopsy questionnaire, in rural north-western Burkina Faso.METHODS: Data from 5649 verbal autopsy questionnaires reviewed by local physicians at the Nouna Health and Demographic Surveillance Site between 1998 and 2007 were considered for analyses. Information from VA interviews was extracted to create a set of standard indicators needed to run the Interpreting Verbal Autopsy model. Cause-specific mortality fractions were used to compare Physician Coded Verbal Autopsy and Interpreting Verbal Autopsy results.RESULTS: At the population level, 62.5% of causes of death using the Interpreting Verbal Autopsy model corresponded with those determined by two or three physicians. Although seven of the 10 main causes of death were present in both approaches, the comparison of percentages of single causes of death shows discrepancies, dominated by higher malaria rates found in the Physician Coded Verbal Autopsy approach.CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that national mortality statistics, which are partly based on verbal autopsies, must be carefully interpreted. Difficulties in determining malaria as cause of death in holoendemic malaria regions might result in higher discrepancies than those in non-endemic areas. As neither Physician Coded Verbal Autopsy nor Interpreting Verbal Autopsy results represent a gold standard, uncertainty levels with either procedure are high.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To compare the cause of death distribution using the Physician Coded Verbal Autopsy approach versus the Interpreting Verbal Autopsy model, based on information from a French verbal autopsy questionnaire, in rural north-western Burkina Faso.METHODS: Data from 5649 verbal autopsy questionnaires reviewed by local physicians at the Nouna Health and Demographic Surveillance Site between 1998 and 2007 were considered for analyses. Information from VA interviews was extracted to create a set of standard indicators needed to run the Interpreting Verbal Autopsy model. Cause-specific mortality fractions were used to compare Physician Coded Verbal Autopsy and Interpreting Verbal Autopsy results.RESULTS: At the population level, 62.5% of causes of death using the Interpreting Verbal Autopsy model corresponded with those determined by two or three physicians. Although seven of the 10 main causes of death were present in both approaches, the comparison of percentages of single causes of death shows discrepancies, dominated by higher malaria rates found in the Physician Coded Verbal Autopsy approach.CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that national mortality statistics, which are partly based on verbal autopsies, must be carefully interpreted. Difficulties in determining malaria as cause of death in holoendemic malaria regions might result in higher discrepancies than those in non-endemic areas. As neither Physician Coded Verbal Autopsy nor Interpreting Verbal Autopsy results represent a gold standard, uncertainty levels with either procedure are high.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Autopsy

KW - Burkina Faso

KW - Cause of Death

KW - Child

KW - Child, Preschool

KW - Clinical Coding

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Infant

KW - Malaria

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Physician's Practice Patterns

KW - Physicians

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Rural Population

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.02998.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.02998.x

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 22574916

VL - 17

SP - 904

EP - 913

JO - TROP MED INT HEALTH

JF - TROP MED INT HEALTH

SN - 1360-2276

IS - 7

ER -