Carfilzomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (KdD) vs. lenalidomide-sparing pomalidomide-containing triplet regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloman: indirect treatment comparisona

Standard

Carfilzomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (KdD) vs. lenalidomide-sparing pomalidomide-containing triplet regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloman: indirect treatment comparisona. / Weisel, Katja; Dimopoulos, Meletios A; Beksac, Meral; Leleu, Xavier; Richter, Joshua; Heeg, Bart; Patel, Sachin; Majer, Istvan; McFadden, Ian; Mikhael, Joseph.

in: LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA, Jahrgang 65, Nr. 4, 04.2024, S. 481-492.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{8247361f3f3b49ed87288d5186c32c37,
title = "Carfilzomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (KdD) vs. lenalidomide-sparing pomalidomide-containing triplet regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloman: indirect treatment comparisona",
abstract = "Nearly all patients with multiple myeloma eventually relapse or become refractory to treatment. Lenalidomide is increasingly administered in the frontline until disease progression or intolerance to therapy, resulting in the need for highly effective, lenalidomide-sparing options. In this study, carfilzomib plus daratumumab and dexamethasone were evaluated against lenalidomide-sparing, pomalidomide-containing triplets using matching-adjusted indirect comparison in the absence of head-to-head data. The analyses utilized long-term follow-up data from the CANDOR study (NCT03158688). Treatment with carfilzomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.60 [95% confidence interval: 0.37, 0.88])vs. pomalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone, and numerically longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.77 [95% confidence interval: 0.50, 1.08]) vs. daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and previous lenalidomide exposure, the majority of whom were lenalidomide refractory. Carfilzomib plus daratumumab and dexamethasone offers a highly effective, lenalidomide-sparing treatment option for this population.",
author = "Katja Weisel and Dimopoulos, {Meletios A} and Meral Beksac and Xavier Leleu and Joshua Richter and Bart Heeg and Sachin Patel and Istvan Majer and Ian McFadden and Joseph Mikhael",
year = "2024",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1080/10428194.2023.2300051",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "481--492",
journal = "LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA",
issn = "1042-8194",
publisher = "informa healthcare",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Carfilzomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (KdD) vs. lenalidomide-sparing pomalidomide-containing triplet regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloman: indirect treatment comparisona

AU - Weisel, Katja

AU - Dimopoulos, Meletios A

AU - Beksac, Meral

AU - Leleu, Xavier

AU - Richter, Joshua

AU - Heeg, Bart

AU - Patel, Sachin

AU - Majer, Istvan

AU - McFadden, Ian

AU - Mikhael, Joseph

PY - 2024/4

Y1 - 2024/4

N2 - Nearly all patients with multiple myeloma eventually relapse or become refractory to treatment. Lenalidomide is increasingly administered in the frontline until disease progression or intolerance to therapy, resulting in the need for highly effective, lenalidomide-sparing options. In this study, carfilzomib plus daratumumab and dexamethasone were evaluated against lenalidomide-sparing, pomalidomide-containing triplets using matching-adjusted indirect comparison in the absence of head-to-head data. The analyses utilized long-term follow-up data from the CANDOR study (NCT03158688). Treatment with carfilzomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.60 [95% confidence interval: 0.37, 0.88])vs. pomalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone, and numerically longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.77 [95% confidence interval: 0.50, 1.08]) vs. daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and previous lenalidomide exposure, the majority of whom were lenalidomide refractory. Carfilzomib plus daratumumab and dexamethasone offers a highly effective, lenalidomide-sparing treatment option for this population.

AB - Nearly all patients with multiple myeloma eventually relapse or become refractory to treatment. Lenalidomide is increasingly administered in the frontline until disease progression or intolerance to therapy, resulting in the need for highly effective, lenalidomide-sparing options. In this study, carfilzomib plus daratumumab and dexamethasone were evaluated against lenalidomide-sparing, pomalidomide-containing triplets using matching-adjusted indirect comparison in the absence of head-to-head data. The analyses utilized long-term follow-up data from the CANDOR study (NCT03158688). Treatment with carfilzomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.60 [95% confidence interval: 0.37, 0.88])vs. pomalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone, and numerically longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.77 [95% confidence interval: 0.50, 1.08]) vs. daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and previous lenalidomide exposure, the majority of whom were lenalidomide refractory. Carfilzomib plus daratumumab and dexamethasone offers a highly effective, lenalidomide-sparing treatment option for this population.

U2 - 10.1080/10428194.2023.2300051

DO - 10.1080/10428194.2023.2300051

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 38345269

VL - 65

SP - 481

EP - 492

JO - LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA

JF - LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA

SN - 1042-8194

IS - 4

ER -