BRAF V600E Mutation in First-line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: an Analysis of Individual Patient Data from the ARCAD Database
Standard
BRAF V600E Mutation in First-line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: an Analysis of Individual Patient Data from the ARCAD Database. / Cohen, Romain; Liu, Heshan; Fiskum, Jack; Adams, Richard; Chibaudel, Benoist; Maughan, Timothy S; Van Cutsem, Eric; Venook, Alan; Douillard, Jean-Yves; Heinemann, Volker; Punt, Cornelis J A; Falcone, Alfredo; Bokemeyer, Carsten; Kaplan, Richard; Lenz, Heinz-Josef; Koopman, Miriam; Yoshino, Takayuki; Zalcberg, John; Grothey, Alex; de Gramont, Aimery; Shi, Qian; André, Thierry.
in: JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, Jahrgang 113, Nr. 10, 01.10.2021, S. 1386-1395.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - BRAF V600E Mutation in First-line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: an Analysis of Individual Patient Data from the ARCAD Database
AU - Cohen, Romain
AU - Liu, Heshan
AU - Fiskum, Jack
AU - Adams, Richard
AU - Chibaudel, Benoist
AU - Maughan, Timothy S
AU - Van Cutsem, Eric
AU - Venook, Alan
AU - Douillard, Jean-Yves
AU - Heinemann, Volker
AU - Punt, Cornelis J A
AU - Falcone, Alfredo
AU - Bokemeyer, Carsten
AU - Kaplan, Richard
AU - Lenz, Heinz-Josef
AU - Koopman, Miriam
AU - Yoshino, Takayuki
AU - Zalcberg, John
AU - Grothey, Alex
AU - de Gramont, Aimery
AU - Shi, Qian
AU - André, Thierry
N1 - © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: First-line therapeutic strategies for patients with BRAFV600E-mutated (BRAFmt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) mainly rely on subgroup analyses from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We aimed to assess the prognostic and predictive impact of BRAFmt on the efficacy of targeted therapies with first-line chemotherapy.METHODS: Individual patient data from first-line RCTs with BRAF and KRAS status data in the ARCAD database were pooled. Progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models. Outcomes were compared between treatment groups that were concurrently randomly assigned whenever possible.RESULTS: A total of 6391 patients from 10 RCTs were included: 573 BRAFmt (9.0%), 2059 KRASmt (32.2%), and 3759 double wild type (58.8%). BRAFmt mCRC patients experienced statistically significantly poorer OS than those with KRASmt (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj] = 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30 to 1.64) and patients with double wild-type tumors (HRadj = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.94 to 2.36). Anti-EGFR agents did not improve progression-free survival or OS of BRAFmt mCRC patients, based on 4 RCTs testing chemotherapy with or without anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) (HRadj = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.71 to 1.30; and HRadj = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.66 to 1.14, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the addition of anti-EGFR agents to chemotherapy is ineffective as first-line treatment for BRAFmt mCRC patients.
AB - BACKGROUND: First-line therapeutic strategies for patients with BRAFV600E-mutated (BRAFmt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) mainly rely on subgroup analyses from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We aimed to assess the prognostic and predictive impact of BRAFmt on the efficacy of targeted therapies with first-line chemotherapy.METHODS: Individual patient data from first-line RCTs with BRAF and KRAS status data in the ARCAD database were pooled. Progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models. Outcomes were compared between treatment groups that were concurrently randomly assigned whenever possible.RESULTS: A total of 6391 patients from 10 RCTs were included: 573 BRAFmt (9.0%), 2059 KRASmt (32.2%), and 3759 double wild type (58.8%). BRAFmt mCRC patients experienced statistically significantly poorer OS than those with KRASmt (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj] = 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30 to 1.64) and patients with double wild-type tumors (HRadj = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.94 to 2.36). Anti-EGFR agents did not improve progression-free survival or OS of BRAFmt mCRC patients, based on 4 RCTs testing chemotherapy with or without anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) (HRadj = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.71 to 1.30; and HRadj = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.66 to 1.14, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the addition of anti-EGFR agents to chemotherapy is ineffective as first-line treatment for BRAFmt mCRC patients.
U2 - 10.1093/jnci/djab042
DO - 10.1093/jnci/djab042
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 33734401
VL - 113
SP - 1386
EP - 1395
JO - JNCI-J NATL CANCER I
JF - JNCI-J NATL CANCER I
SN - 0027-8874
IS - 10
ER -