PortalPublikationenBiopsies performed at tertiary care centers are superior to ...

Biopsies performed at tertiary care centers are superior to referral biopsies in predicting pathologic Gleason sum.

Standard

Biopsies performed at tertiary care centers are superior to referral biopsies in predicting pathologic Gleason sum. / Karakiewicz, Pierre I; Chun, Felix; Gallina, Andrea; Nazareno, Suardi; Briganti, Alberto; Erbersdobler, Andreas; Schlomm, Thorsten; Walz, Jochen; Currlin, Eike; Michl, Uwe; Haese, Alexander; Arjane, Philippe; Heinzer, Hans; Graefen, Markus; Huland, Hartwig.

in: J ENDOUROL, Jahrgang 22, Nr. 3, 3, 2008, S. 533-538.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Karakiewicz, PI, Chun, F, Gallina, A, Nazareno, S, Briganti, A, Erbersdobler, A, Schlomm, T, Walz, J, Currlin, E, Michl, U, Haese, A, Arjane, P, Heinzer, H, Graefen, M & Huland, H 2008, 'Biopsies performed at tertiary care centers are superior to referral biopsies in predicting pathologic Gleason sum.', J ENDOUROL, Jg. 22, Nr. 3, 3, S. 533-538. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18355149?dopt=Citation>

APA

Karakiewicz, P. I., Chun, F., Gallina, A., Nazareno, S., Briganti, A., Erbersdobler, A., Schlomm, T., Walz, J., Currlin, E., Michl, U., Haese, A., Arjane, P., Heinzer, H., Graefen, M., & Huland, H. (2008). Biopsies performed at tertiary care centers are superior to referral biopsies in predicting pathologic Gleason sum. J ENDOUROL, 22(3), 533-538. [3]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18355149?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Karakiewicz PI, Chun F, Gallina A, Nazareno S, Briganti A, Erbersdobler A et al. Biopsies performed at tertiary care centers are superior to referral biopsies in predicting pathologic Gleason sum. J ENDOUROL. 2008;22(3):533-538. 3.

Bibtex

@article{47cecbb7f60c42d889eab57ffcf6bc5c,
title = "Biopsies performed at tertiary care centers are superior to referral biopsies in predicting pathologic Gleason sum.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Biopsy grading at tertiary care centers may or may not be superior to biopsies performed at referral institutions. METHODS: Referral biopsy and tertiary care center biopsy Gleason sums were studied in 758 men treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) at a tertiary care center between 1992 and 2004. Grade agreement was calculated using the Cohen kappa ({\^e}). Logistic regression models predicting high-grade prostate cancer at RP were fitted using either referral or tertiary care center biopsies. Comparison of bootstrap-corrected predictive accuracy estimates were performed using the Mantel-Haenszel test. RESULTS: Grade agreement between biopsy and RP Gleason sum was higher (P = 0.003) for tertiary care center biopsies v referral biopsies (55.5% v 47.9%; P = 0.003). Upgrading occurred in 39.8% of referral biopsies v 32.6% of tertiary care center biopsies (P = 0.03). Tertiary care center biopsies were more accurate in determining RP Gleason sum than referral biopsies (71.5% v 65.6%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: More accurate prediction of RP Gleason grade may be achieved if biopsy is performed and graded at tertiary care centers.",
author = "Karakiewicz, {Pierre I} and Felix Chun and Andrea Gallina and Suardi Nazareno and Alberto Briganti and Andreas Erbersdobler and Thorsten Schlomm and Jochen Walz and Eike Currlin and Uwe Michl and Alexander Haese and Philippe Arjane and Hans Heinzer and Markus Graefen and Hartwig Huland",
year = "2008",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "22",
pages = "533--538",
journal = "J ENDOUROL",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biopsies performed at tertiary care centers are superior to referral biopsies in predicting pathologic Gleason sum.

AU - Karakiewicz, Pierre I

AU - Chun, Felix

AU - Gallina, Andrea

AU - Nazareno, Suardi

AU - Briganti, Alberto

AU - Erbersdobler, Andreas

AU - Schlomm, Thorsten

AU - Walz, Jochen

AU - Currlin, Eike

AU - Michl, Uwe

AU - Haese, Alexander

AU - Arjane, Philippe

AU - Heinzer, Hans

AU - Graefen, Markus

AU - Huland, Hartwig

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Biopsy grading at tertiary care centers may or may not be superior to biopsies performed at referral institutions. METHODS: Referral biopsy and tertiary care center biopsy Gleason sums were studied in 758 men treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) at a tertiary care center between 1992 and 2004. Grade agreement was calculated using the Cohen kappa (ê). Logistic regression models predicting high-grade prostate cancer at RP were fitted using either referral or tertiary care center biopsies. Comparison of bootstrap-corrected predictive accuracy estimates were performed using the Mantel-Haenszel test. RESULTS: Grade agreement between biopsy and RP Gleason sum was higher (P = 0.003) for tertiary care center biopsies v referral biopsies (55.5% v 47.9%; P = 0.003). Upgrading occurred in 39.8% of referral biopsies v 32.6% of tertiary care center biopsies (P = 0.03). Tertiary care center biopsies were more accurate in determining RP Gleason sum than referral biopsies (71.5% v 65.6%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: More accurate prediction of RP Gleason grade may be achieved if biopsy is performed and graded at tertiary care centers.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Biopsy grading at tertiary care centers may or may not be superior to biopsies performed at referral institutions. METHODS: Referral biopsy and tertiary care center biopsy Gleason sums were studied in 758 men treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) at a tertiary care center between 1992 and 2004. Grade agreement was calculated using the Cohen kappa (ê). Logistic regression models predicting high-grade prostate cancer at RP were fitted using either referral or tertiary care center biopsies. Comparison of bootstrap-corrected predictive accuracy estimates were performed using the Mantel-Haenszel test. RESULTS: Grade agreement between biopsy and RP Gleason sum was higher (P = 0.003) for tertiary care center biopsies v referral biopsies (55.5% v 47.9%; P = 0.003). Upgrading occurred in 39.8% of referral biopsies v 32.6% of tertiary care center biopsies (P = 0.03). Tertiary care center biopsies were more accurate in determining RP Gleason sum than referral biopsies (71.5% v 65.6%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: More accurate prediction of RP Gleason grade may be achieved if biopsy is performed and graded at tertiary care centers.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 22

SP - 533

EP - 538

JO - J ENDOUROL

JF - J ENDOUROL

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 3

M1 - 3

ER -