Biomodulatory Treatment of Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Phase II Study of Imatinib with Pioglitazone, Etoricoxib, Dexamethasone and Low-Dose Treosulfan

Standard

Biomodulatory Treatment of Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Phase II Study of Imatinib with Pioglitazone, Etoricoxib, Dexamethasone and Low-Dose Treosulfan. / Vogelhuber, M; Feyerabend, S; Stenzl, A; Suedhoff, T; Schulze, M; Huebner, J; Oberneder, R; Wieland, W; Mueller, S; Eichhorn, F; Heinzer, H; Schmidt, K; Baier, M; Ruebel, A; Birkholz, K; Bakhshandeh-Bath, A; Andreesen, R; Herr, W; Reichle, A.

in: CANCER MICROENVIRON, Jahrgang 8, Nr. 1, 2015, S. 33-41.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Vogelhuber, M, Feyerabend, S, Stenzl, A, Suedhoff, T, Schulze, M, Huebner, J, Oberneder, R, Wieland, W, Mueller, S, Eichhorn, F, Heinzer, H, Schmidt, K, Baier, M, Ruebel, A, Birkholz, K, Bakhshandeh-Bath, A, Andreesen, R, Herr, W & Reichle, A 2015, 'Biomodulatory Treatment of Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Phase II Study of Imatinib with Pioglitazone, Etoricoxib, Dexamethasone and Low-Dose Treosulfan', CANCER MICROENVIRON, Jg. 8, Nr. 1, S. 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12307-014-0161-7

APA

Vogelhuber, M., Feyerabend, S., Stenzl, A., Suedhoff, T., Schulze, M., Huebner, J., Oberneder, R., Wieland, W., Mueller, S., Eichhorn, F., Heinzer, H., Schmidt, K., Baier, M., Ruebel, A., Birkholz, K., Bakhshandeh-Bath, A., Andreesen, R., Herr, W., & Reichle, A. (2015). Biomodulatory Treatment of Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Phase II Study of Imatinib with Pioglitazone, Etoricoxib, Dexamethasone and Low-Dose Treosulfan. CANCER MICROENVIRON, 8(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12307-014-0161-7

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{d6f19c7890354ccdbd7725f8d2211b2a,
title = "Biomodulatory Treatment of Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Phase II Study of Imatinib with Pioglitazone, Etoricoxib, Dexamethasone and Low-Dose Treosulfan",
abstract = "Therapeutic options for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remain limited. In a multicenter, Phase II study, 65 patients with histologically confirmed CRPC received a biomodulatory regimen during the six-month core study. Treatment comprised daily doses of imatinib mesylate, pioglitazone, etoricoxib, treosulfan and dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Responders could enter an extension phase until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred. Mean PSA was 45.3 ng/mL at baseline, and 77 % of patients had a PSA doubling time <3 months. Of the 61 evaluable patients, 37 patients (60.6 %) responded or had stable disease and 23 of them (37.7 % of 61 patients) were PSA responders. Among the 23 responders mean PSA decreased from 278.9 ± 784.1 ng/mL at baseline to 8.8 ± 11.6 ng/mL at the final visit (week 24). The progression-free survival (PFS) was 467 days in the ITT population. Of the 947 adverse events, 57.6 % were suspected to be drug-related, 13.8 % led to dose adjustment or permanent discontinuation and 40.2 % required concomitant medication. This novel combination approach led to an impressive PSA response rate of 37.7 % in CRPC patients. The good PSA response and PFS rate combined with the manageable toxicity profile suggest an alternative treatment option.",
author = "M Vogelhuber and S Feyerabend and A Stenzl and T Suedhoff and M Schulze and J Huebner and R Oberneder and W Wieland and S Mueller and F Eichhorn and H Heinzer and K Schmidt and M Baier and A Ruebel and K Birkholz and A Bakhshandeh-Bath and R Andreesen and W Herr and A Reichle",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s12307-014-0161-7",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "33--41",
journal = "CANCER MICROENVIRON",
issn = "1875-2292",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomodulatory Treatment of Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Phase II Study of Imatinib with Pioglitazone, Etoricoxib, Dexamethasone and Low-Dose Treosulfan

AU - Vogelhuber, M

AU - Feyerabend, S

AU - Stenzl, A

AU - Suedhoff, T

AU - Schulze, M

AU - Huebner, J

AU - Oberneder, R

AU - Wieland, W

AU - Mueller, S

AU - Eichhorn, F

AU - Heinzer, H

AU - Schmidt, K

AU - Baier, M

AU - Ruebel, A

AU - Birkholz, K

AU - Bakhshandeh-Bath, A

AU - Andreesen, R

AU - Herr, W

AU - Reichle, A

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Therapeutic options for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remain limited. In a multicenter, Phase II study, 65 patients with histologically confirmed CRPC received a biomodulatory regimen during the six-month core study. Treatment comprised daily doses of imatinib mesylate, pioglitazone, etoricoxib, treosulfan and dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Responders could enter an extension phase until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred. Mean PSA was 45.3 ng/mL at baseline, and 77 % of patients had a PSA doubling time <3 months. Of the 61 evaluable patients, 37 patients (60.6 %) responded or had stable disease and 23 of them (37.7 % of 61 patients) were PSA responders. Among the 23 responders mean PSA decreased from 278.9 ± 784.1 ng/mL at baseline to 8.8 ± 11.6 ng/mL at the final visit (week 24). The progression-free survival (PFS) was 467 days in the ITT population. Of the 947 adverse events, 57.6 % were suspected to be drug-related, 13.8 % led to dose adjustment or permanent discontinuation and 40.2 % required concomitant medication. This novel combination approach led to an impressive PSA response rate of 37.7 % in CRPC patients. The good PSA response and PFS rate combined with the manageable toxicity profile suggest an alternative treatment option.

AB - Therapeutic options for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remain limited. In a multicenter, Phase II study, 65 patients with histologically confirmed CRPC received a biomodulatory regimen during the six-month core study. Treatment comprised daily doses of imatinib mesylate, pioglitazone, etoricoxib, treosulfan and dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Responders could enter an extension phase until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurred. Mean PSA was 45.3 ng/mL at baseline, and 77 % of patients had a PSA doubling time <3 months. Of the 61 evaluable patients, 37 patients (60.6 %) responded or had stable disease and 23 of them (37.7 % of 61 patients) were PSA responders. Among the 23 responders mean PSA decreased from 278.9 ± 784.1 ng/mL at baseline to 8.8 ± 11.6 ng/mL at the final visit (week 24). The progression-free survival (PFS) was 467 days in the ITT population. Of the 947 adverse events, 57.6 % were suspected to be drug-related, 13.8 % led to dose adjustment or permanent discontinuation and 40.2 % required concomitant medication. This novel combination approach led to an impressive PSA response rate of 37.7 % in CRPC patients. The good PSA response and PFS rate combined with the manageable toxicity profile suggest an alternative treatment option.

U2 - 10.1007/s12307-014-0161-7

DO - 10.1007/s12307-014-0161-7

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25503648

VL - 8

SP - 33

EP - 41

JO - CANCER MICROENVIRON

JF - CANCER MICROENVIRON

SN - 1875-2292

IS - 1

ER -