Benefits of self-help groups: a survey of 232 members from 65 disease-related groups.

Standard

Benefits of self-help groups: a survey of 232 members from 65 disease-related groups. / Trojan, Alf.

in: SOC SCI MED, Jahrgang 29, Nr. 2, 2, 1989, S. 225-232.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c84d5b786af7454bb4bb1820b3239496,
title = "Benefits of self-help groups: a survey of 232 members from 65 disease-related groups.",
abstract = "This paper gives a report on the benefits of self-help groups as depicted by 232 members from 65 different disease-related groups. Intensive interviews and participant observation enabled us to formulate a questionnaire with 125 mostly standardized questions. The questions referred mainly to motives for membership, working procedures within the groups, goals and effectiveness, outcome of participation and need for outside support. The focus of this paper will be on what the members reported about the changes and effects induced by their participation in self-help groups. The interviewed group members reported a wide variety of goals. These were classified into two categories according to their range. Goals directed towards the group or group members were achieved (at least partly) by more than 90%. Goals directed towards persons outside the group (e.g. to change opinions of the family or of the professional system) were mentioned by about two thirds of the interviewed members. About three quarters of them achieved these goals at least partly. The effects of participation were grouped into the following categories. 1--Impact on disease-related stress (positive health effects, general enlargement of competence, general social activation); 2--impact on the relationship with family and friends (relationship with partner, changes in personal network); 3--impact on patient behaviour and professional services (general enlargement of competence in relation to the professional care system, social activation in relation to the professional care system, utilization of professional services). Most of the members reported considerable positive changes in these dimensions. Negative impacts were mentioned by a very small minority (between 1 and 4%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)",
author = "Alf Trojan",
year = "1989",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "29",
pages = "225--232",
journal = "SOC SCI MED",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefits of self-help groups: a survey of 232 members from 65 disease-related groups.

AU - Trojan, Alf

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - This paper gives a report on the benefits of self-help groups as depicted by 232 members from 65 different disease-related groups. Intensive interviews and participant observation enabled us to formulate a questionnaire with 125 mostly standardized questions. The questions referred mainly to motives for membership, working procedures within the groups, goals and effectiveness, outcome of participation and need for outside support. The focus of this paper will be on what the members reported about the changes and effects induced by their participation in self-help groups. The interviewed group members reported a wide variety of goals. These were classified into two categories according to their range. Goals directed towards the group or group members were achieved (at least partly) by more than 90%. Goals directed towards persons outside the group (e.g. to change opinions of the family or of the professional system) were mentioned by about two thirds of the interviewed members. About three quarters of them achieved these goals at least partly. The effects of participation were grouped into the following categories. 1--Impact on disease-related stress (positive health effects, general enlargement of competence, general social activation); 2--impact on the relationship with family and friends (relationship with partner, changes in personal network); 3--impact on patient behaviour and professional services (general enlargement of competence in relation to the professional care system, social activation in relation to the professional care system, utilization of professional services). Most of the members reported considerable positive changes in these dimensions. Negative impacts were mentioned by a very small minority (between 1 and 4%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

AB - This paper gives a report on the benefits of self-help groups as depicted by 232 members from 65 different disease-related groups. Intensive interviews and participant observation enabled us to formulate a questionnaire with 125 mostly standardized questions. The questions referred mainly to motives for membership, working procedures within the groups, goals and effectiveness, outcome of participation and need for outside support. The focus of this paper will be on what the members reported about the changes and effects induced by their participation in self-help groups. The interviewed group members reported a wide variety of goals. These were classified into two categories according to their range. Goals directed towards the group or group members were achieved (at least partly) by more than 90%. Goals directed towards persons outside the group (e.g. to change opinions of the family or of the professional system) were mentioned by about two thirds of the interviewed members. About three quarters of them achieved these goals at least partly. The effects of participation were grouped into the following categories. 1--Impact on disease-related stress (positive health effects, general enlargement of competence, general social activation); 2--impact on the relationship with family and friends (relationship with partner, changes in personal network); 3--impact on patient behaviour and professional services (general enlargement of competence in relation to the professional care system, social activation in relation to the professional care system, utilization of professional services). Most of the members reported considerable positive changes in these dimensions. Negative impacts were mentioned by a very small minority (between 1 and 4%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 29

SP - 225

EP - 232

JO - SOC SCI MED

JF - SOC SCI MED

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 2

M1 - 2

ER -