Benefit-risk perception of natalizumab therapy in neurologists and a large cohort of multiple sclerosis patients

Standard

Benefit-risk perception of natalizumab therapy in neurologists and a large cohort of multiple sclerosis patients. / Heesen, Christoph; Kleiter, Ingo; Meuth, Sven G; Krämer, Julia; Kasper, Jürgen; Köpke, Sascha; Gaissmaier, Wolfgang.

in: J NEUROL SCI, Jahrgang 376, 07.03.2017, S. 181-190.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{228f22042c404766bc7df5024ba8472a,
title = "Benefit-risk perception of natalizumab therapy in neurologists and a large cohort of multiple sclerosis patients",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Natalizumab (NAT) is associated with the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Risk stratification algorithms have been developed, however, without detectable reduction of PML incidence.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate to which extent patients and physicians understand and accept risks associated with NAT treatment.METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study in German MS centers (n=73) among NAT-treated MS patients (n=801) and their neurologists (n=99). Patients included in this study had mean disease duration of 10.2years and a mean NAT treatment duration of 24months.RESULTS: More than 90% of patients and physicians voted for shared decision making or an informed choice decision making approach. Patients and physicians perceived a similar threat from MS as serious disease and both overestimated treatment benefits from NAT based on trial data. Men perceived MS more severe than women and perception of seriousness increased with age in both groups and in patients as well with increasing disability. Although patients evaluated their PML risk higher, their risk acceptance was significantly higher than of their neurologists. Risk stratification knowledge was good among neurologists and significantly lower among patients.CONCLUSION: While patients and physicians seem to have realistic risk perception of PML and knowledge of risk stratification concepts, the threat of MS and the perception of treatment benefits may explain the ongoing high acceptance of PML risk.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Christoph Heesen and Ingo Kleiter and Meuth, {Sven G} and Julia Kr{\"a}mer and J{\"u}rgen Kasper and Sascha K{\"o}pke and Wolfgang Gaissmaier",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2017",
month = mar,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jns.2017.03.001",
language = "English",
volume = "376",
pages = "181--190",
journal = "J NEUROL SCI",
issn = "0022-510X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefit-risk perception of natalizumab therapy in neurologists and a large cohort of multiple sclerosis patients

AU - Heesen, Christoph

AU - Kleiter, Ingo

AU - Meuth, Sven G

AU - Krämer, Julia

AU - Kasper, Jürgen

AU - Köpke, Sascha

AU - Gaissmaier, Wolfgang

N1 - Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/3/7

Y1 - 2017/3/7

N2 - BACKGROUND: Natalizumab (NAT) is associated with the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Risk stratification algorithms have been developed, however, without detectable reduction of PML incidence.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate to which extent patients and physicians understand and accept risks associated with NAT treatment.METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study in German MS centers (n=73) among NAT-treated MS patients (n=801) and their neurologists (n=99). Patients included in this study had mean disease duration of 10.2years and a mean NAT treatment duration of 24months.RESULTS: More than 90% of patients and physicians voted for shared decision making or an informed choice decision making approach. Patients and physicians perceived a similar threat from MS as serious disease and both overestimated treatment benefits from NAT based on trial data. Men perceived MS more severe than women and perception of seriousness increased with age in both groups and in patients as well with increasing disability. Although patients evaluated their PML risk higher, their risk acceptance was significantly higher than of their neurologists. Risk stratification knowledge was good among neurologists and significantly lower among patients.CONCLUSION: While patients and physicians seem to have realistic risk perception of PML and knowledge of risk stratification concepts, the threat of MS and the perception of treatment benefits may explain the ongoing high acceptance of PML risk.

AB - BACKGROUND: Natalizumab (NAT) is associated with the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Risk stratification algorithms have been developed, however, without detectable reduction of PML incidence.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate to which extent patients and physicians understand and accept risks associated with NAT treatment.METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study in German MS centers (n=73) among NAT-treated MS patients (n=801) and their neurologists (n=99). Patients included in this study had mean disease duration of 10.2years and a mean NAT treatment duration of 24months.RESULTS: More than 90% of patients and physicians voted for shared decision making or an informed choice decision making approach. Patients and physicians perceived a similar threat from MS as serious disease and both overestimated treatment benefits from NAT based on trial data. Men perceived MS more severe than women and perception of seriousness increased with age in both groups and in patients as well with increasing disability. Although patients evaluated their PML risk higher, their risk acceptance was significantly higher than of their neurologists. Risk stratification knowledge was good among neurologists and significantly lower among patients.CONCLUSION: While patients and physicians seem to have realistic risk perception of PML and knowledge of risk stratification concepts, the threat of MS and the perception of treatment benefits may explain the ongoing high acceptance of PML risk.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1016/j.jns.2017.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jns.2017.03.001

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28431609

VL - 376

SP - 181

EP - 190

JO - J NEUROL SCI

JF - J NEUROL SCI

SN - 0022-510X

ER -