Bacterial population of chronic crural ulcers: Is there a difference between the diabetic, the venous, and the arterial ulcer?

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bacterial population of chronic crural ulcers: Is there a difference between the diabetic, the venous, and the arterial ulcer?

AU - Schmidt, K.

AU - Debus, E. S.

AU - Jeßberger, St

AU - Ziegler, U.

AU - Thiede, A.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Background: At the Surgical Department of Surgery of the University Hospital Wurzburg microbiological examinations were performed of the ulcer grounds from patients with diabetic-neuropathic, diabetic-ischemic, venous, and arterial leg ulcers. The aim of the examination was to evaluate possible differences in the healing process of these ulcers based on the knowledge of their bacterial populations. Patients and methods: In a period of four months, 63 patients were consecutively examined by taking a bacteriological swab of their ulcer area. The healing process of their wounds was followed and related to the impact of bacterial colonisation and clinical signs of infection. Results: 95% of the venous and arterial leg ulcers had a positive smear, whereas only 70% of diabetic ulcers were positive for bacterial growth. Bacterial population of the three ulcer entities, however did not differ significantly. 100% of the clinically infected venous and arterial ulcers but only 80% of the diabetic wounds revealed a positive smear. On the other hand, only 22 % of the venous ulcers with a positive smear developed a clinical infection in contrast to 70% of the arterial and diabetic. Venous ulcers showed only by a few patients prolonged healing, even in cases of marked bacterial contamination. Despite of clinical signs of infection however, diabetic wounds sometimes did not reveal a positive wound smear (20%). All infected venous, but only 20% of the infected ischemic ulcers healed satisfactorily. Arterial wounds with no bacterial growth healed significantly better than contaminated wounds. This difference was not significant in the other entities. Radical removal of the infection by minor amputation increased the healing rate in diabetic ulcers over 80%, whereas ischemic wounds did not profit from this therapy. Conclusions: A positive bacterial wound smear is not inevitably correlated with a protracted leg ulcer healing. Nevertheless a fulminant infection often developed in diabetic ulcers despite the initial inability to demonstrate bacterial growth. In order to start antibiotic treatment as early as possible, a wound smear should be obtained routinely from patients with diabetic ulcers. In chronic venous ulcers, a routine swab does not appear to be indicated as it bears no clinical consequences. The same applies to patients with surgically fully treated peripheral arterial occlusive disease. As ischemia presents the limiting factor, antibiotic therapy in case of infection will not prevent imminent amputation.

AB - Background: At the Surgical Department of Surgery of the University Hospital Wurzburg microbiological examinations were performed of the ulcer grounds from patients with diabetic-neuropathic, diabetic-ischemic, venous, and arterial leg ulcers. The aim of the examination was to evaluate possible differences in the healing process of these ulcers based on the knowledge of their bacterial populations. Patients and methods: In a period of four months, 63 patients were consecutively examined by taking a bacteriological swab of their ulcer area. The healing process of their wounds was followed and related to the impact of bacterial colonisation and clinical signs of infection. Results: 95% of the venous and arterial leg ulcers had a positive smear, whereas only 70% of diabetic ulcers were positive for bacterial growth. Bacterial population of the three ulcer entities, however did not differ significantly. 100% of the clinically infected venous and arterial ulcers but only 80% of the diabetic wounds revealed a positive smear. On the other hand, only 22 % of the venous ulcers with a positive smear developed a clinical infection in contrast to 70% of the arterial and diabetic. Venous ulcers showed only by a few patients prolonged healing, even in cases of marked bacterial contamination. Despite of clinical signs of infection however, diabetic wounds sometimes did not reveal a positive wound smear (20%). All infected venous, but only 20% of the infected ischemic ulcers healed satisfactorily. Arterial wounds with no bacterial growth healed significantly better than contaminated wounds. This difference was not significant in the other entities. Radical removal of the infection by minor amputation increased the healing rate in diabetic ulcers over 80%, whereas ischemic wounds did not profit from this therapy. Conclusions: A positive bacterial wound smear is not inevitably correlated with a protracted leg ulcer healing. Nevertheless a fulminant infection often developed in diabetic ulcers despite the initial inability to demonstrate bacterial growth. In order to start antibiotic treatment as early as possible, a wound smear should be obtained routinely from patients with diabetic ulcers. In chronic venous ulcers, a routine swab does not appear to be indicated as it bears no clinical consequences. The same applies to patients with surgically fully treated peripheral arterial occlusive disease. As ischemia presents the limiting factor, antibiotic therapy in case of infection will not prevent imminent amputation.

KW - Amputation

KW - Antibiotic therapy

KW - Infection

KW - Ulcer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033998392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1024/0301-1526.29.1.62

DO - 10.1024/0301-1526.29.1.62

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 10731891

AN - SCOPUS:0033998392

VL - 29

SP - 62

EP - 70

JO - VASA

JF - VASA

SN - 0301-1526

IS - 1

ER -