Automatic threshold tracking activation without the intraoperative evaluation of the evoked response amplitude. AUTOCAP Investigators.
Standard
Automatic threshold tracking activation without the intraoperative evaluation of the evoked response amplitude. AUTOCAP Investigators. / Schuchert, Andreas; Ventura, Rodolfo; Meinertz, Thomas.
in: PACE, Jahrgang 23, Nr. 3, 2000, S. 321-324.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Automatic threshold tracking activation without the intraoperative evaluation of the evoked response amplitude. AUTOCAP Investigators.
AU - Schuchert, Andreas
AU - Ventura, Rodolfo
AU - Meinertz, Thomas
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Automatic threshold tracking (Autocapture) controls the amplitude of the pacing pulse and adjusts it to the actual pacing threshold. The algorithm is based on the proper detection of the evoked response (ER) amplitude after the pacing pulse. For this reason an intraoperative evaluation of ER and polarization is recommended. The aims of the study were to evaluate the ER signal and polarization and the performance of automatic threshold tracking without any intraoperative testing of the ER signal. In addition, the ER amplitude was correlated with the pacing threshold, pacing impedance, spontaneous R wave amplitude, and with the clinical data. The study included 60 patients who received the VVIR pacemaker Regency connected to the Membrane E 1450/1452 pacing lead (St. Jude-Pacesetter). At implantation, a pacing threshold < 0.7 V at 0.5 ms was achieved in all patients. ER and polarization were assessed for the first time at hospital predischarge testing. Follow-up measurements were conducted at month 1, 3, and 6. The ER amplitude at hospital discharge was 8.4 ± 4.2 mV and increased to 9.4 ± 4.8 mV at the 6- month follow-up. The pacemaker recommended not to program automatic threshold tracking on in one patient permanently and in three patients intermittently. The ER amplitudes were not differently distributed in men compared with women or in right-sided compared to left-sided implants. The correlation between age and the evoked response was r = 0.15. The correlation between ER amplitude and pacing threshold was r = -0.08, with pacing impedance r = 0.02, and with R wave amplitude r = 0.44. In conclusion, despite no operative evaluation of the ER amplitude being performed, the mean ER amplitude was about 9 mV at 6-month follow-up. Automatic threshold tracking could be programmed on in 93% of the patients throughout the time. Neither the clinical data nor the conventional electrical parameters help to predict patients who will have low ER amplitude or to optimize the ER signal at implantation.
AB - Automatic threshold tracking (Autocapture) controls the amplitude of the pacing pulse and adjusts it to the actual pacing threshold. The algorithm is based on the proper detection of the evoked response (ER) amplitude after the pacing pulse. For this reason an intraoperative evaluation of ER and polarization is recommended. The aims of the study were to evaluate the ER signal and polarization and the performance of automatic threshold tracking without any intraoperative testing of the ER signal. In addition, the ER amplitude was correlated with the pacing threshold, pacing impedance, spontaneous R wave amplitude, and with the clinical data. The study included 60 patients who received the VVIR pacemaker Regency connected to the Membrane E 1450/1452 pacing lead (St. Jude-Pacesetter). At implantation, a pacing threshold < 0.7 V at 0.5 ms was achieved in all patients. ER and polarization were assessed for the first time at hospital predischarge testing. Follow-up measurements were conducted at month 1, 3, and 6. The ER amplitude at hospital discharge was 8.4 ± 4.2 mV and increased to 9.4 ± 4.8 mV at the 6- month follow-up. The pacemaker recommended not to program automatic threshold tracking on in one patient permanently and in three patients intermittently. The ER amplitudes were not differently distributed in men compared with women or in right-sided compared to left-sided implants. The correlation between age and the evoked response was r = 0.15. The correlation between ER amplitude and pacing threshold was r = -0.08, with pacing impedance r = 0.02, and with R wave amplitude r = 0.44. In conclusion, despite no operative evaluation of the ER amplitude being performed, the mean ER amplitude was about 9 mV at 6-month follow-up. Automatic threshold tracking could be programmed on in 93% of the patients throughout the time. Neither the clinical data nor the conventional electrical parameters help to predict patients who will have low ER amplitude or to optimize the ER signal at implantation.
KW - Autocapture
KW - Evoked response
KW - Polarization
KW - VVIR pacemaker
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034101826&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb06756.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb06756.x
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 10750131
AN - SCOPUS:0034101826
VL - 23
SP - 321
EP - 324
JO - PACE
JF - PACE
SN - 0147-8389
IS - 3
ER -