Automated "Bone Subtraction" Image Analysis Software Package for Improved and Faster CT Monitoring of Longitudinal Spine Involvement in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
Standard
Automated "Bone Subtraction" Image Analysis Software Package for Improved and Faster CT Monitoring of Longitudinal Spine Involvement in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. / Horger, Marius; Ditt, Hendrick; Liao, Shu; Weisel, Katja; Fritz, Jan; Thaiss, Wolfgang M; Kaufmann, Sascha; Nikolaou, Konstantin; Kloth, Christopher.
in: ACAD RADIOL, Jahrgang 24, Nr. 5, 05.2017, S. 623-632.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Automated "Bone Subtraction" Image Analysis Software Package for Improved and Faster CT Monitoring of Longitudinal Spine Involvement in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
AU - Horger, Marius
AU - Ditt, Hendrick
AU - Liao, Shu
AU - Weisel, Katja
AU - Fritz, Jan
AU - Thaiss, Wolfgang M
AU - Kaufmann, Sascha
AU - Nikolaou, Konstantin
AU - Kloth, Christopher
N1 - Copyright © 2017 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/5
Y1 - 2017/5
N2 - RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to assess the diagnostic benefit of a novel computed tomography (CT) post-processing software generating subtraction maps of longitudinal non-enhanced CT examinations for monitoring the course of myeloma bone disease in the spine.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local institutional review board approved the retrospective data evaluation. Included were 82 consecutive myeloma patients (46 male; mean age, 65.08 ± 9.76) who underwent 188 repeated whole-body reduced-dose Multislice Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) at our institution between December 2013 and January 2016. Lytic bone lesions were categorized as new or enlarging versus stable. Bone subtraction maps were read in combination with corresponding 1-mm source images comparing results to those of standard image reading of 5-mm axial and 2-mm multiplanar reformat reconstructions (MPR) scans and hematologic markers, and classified as either progressive disease (PD) or stable disease (SD or remission). The standard of reference was 1-mm axial CT image reading + hematologic response both confirmed at follow-up. For statistical purposes, we subgrouped the hematologic response categories similarly to those applied for CT imaging (progression vs stable/response).RESULTS: According to the standard of reference, 16 patients experienced PD and 66 SD at follow-up. Th sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for axial 5 mm + 2 mm MPR image versus bone subtraction maps in a "lesion-by-lesion" reading were 97.6%, 92.3%, and 97.2% versus 97.8%, 96.7%, and 97.7%, respectively. The use of bone subtraction maps resulted in a change of response classification in 9.7% of the patients (n = 8) versus 5 mm + 2 mm MPR image reading from SD to PD. Bone sclerosis lesions were detected in 52 out of 82 patients (63.4%). The reading time was significantly lower with the software bone subtraction compared to standard reading (P < 0.01) and 1-mm image reading (P < 0.001).CONCLUSION: Accuracy of bone subtraction maps reading for monitoring multiple myeloma is slightly increased over that of conventional axial + MPR image reading and significantly speeds up the reading time.
AB - RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to assess the diagnostic benefit of a novel computed tomography (CT) post-processing software generating subtraction maps of longitudinal non-enhanced CT examinations for monitoring the course of myeloma bone disease in the spine.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local institutional review board approved the retrospective data evaluation. Included were 82 consecutive myeloma patients (46 male; mean age, 65.08 ± 9.76) who underwent 188 repeated whole-body reduced-dose Multislice Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) at our institution between December 2013 and January 2016. Lytic bone lesions were categorized as new or enlarging versus stable. Bone subtraction maps were read in combination with corresponding 1-mm source images comparing results to those of standard image reading of 5-mm axial and 2-mm multiplanar reformat reconstructions (MPR) scans and hematologic markers, and classified as either progressive disease (PD) or stable disease (SD or remission). The standard of reference was 1-mm axial CT image reading + hematologic response both confirmed at follow-up. For statistical purposes, we subgrouped the hematologic response categories similarly to those applied for CT imaging (progression vs stable/response).RESULTS: According to the standard of reference, 16 patients experienced PD and 66 SD at follow-up. Th sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for axial 5 mm + 2 mm MPR image versus bone subtraction maps in a "lesion-by-lesion" reading were 97.6%, 92.3%, and 97.2% versus 97.8%, 96.7%, and 97.7%, respectively. The use of bone subtraction maps resulted in a change of response classification in 9.7% of the patients (n = 8) versus 5 mm + 2 mm MPR image reading from SD to PD. Bone sclerosis lesions were detected in 52 out of 82 patients (63.4%). The reading time was significantly lower with the software bone subtraction compared to standard reading (P < 0.01) and 1-mm image reading (P < 0.001).CONCLUSION: Accuracy of bone subtraction maps reading for monitoring multiple myeloma is slightly increased over that of conventional axial + MPR image reading and significantly speeds up the reading time.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
KW - Lumbar Vertebrae
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Multidetector Computed Tomography
KW - Multiple Myeloma
KW - Neoplasm Staging
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Software
KW - Spinal Neoplasms
KW - Subtraction Technique
KW - Thoracic Vertebrae
KW - Whole Body Imaging
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2016.12.003
DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2016.12.003
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 28256439
VL - 24
SP - 623
EP - 632
JO - ACAD RADIOL
JF - ACAD RADIOL
SN - 1076-6332
IS - 5
ER -