Assessing Children's Eudaimonic Well-Being

Standard

Assessing Children's Eudaimonic Well-Being : The PROMIS Pediatric Meaning and Purpose Item Banks. / Forrest, Christopher B; Bevans, Katherine B; Filus, Ania; Devine, Janine; Becker, Brandon D; Carle, Adam C; Teneralli, Rachel E; Moon, JeanHee; Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike.

in: J PEDIATR PSYCHOL, Jahrgang 44, Nr. 9, 01.10.2019, S. 1074-1082.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Forrest, CB, Bevans, KB, Filus, A, Devine, J, Becker, BD, Carle, AC, Teneralli, RE, Moon, J & Ravens-Sieberer, U 2019, 'Assessing Children's Eudaimonic Well-Being: The PROMIS Pediatric Meaning and Purpose Item Banks', J PEDIATR PSYCHOL, Jg. 44, Nr. 9, S. 1074-1082. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsz046

APA

Forrest, C. B., Bevans, K. B., Filus, A., Devine, J., Becker, B. D., Carle, A. C., Teneralli, R. E., Moon, J., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2019). Assessing Children's Eudaimonic Well-Being: The PROMIS Pediatric Meaning and Purpose Item Banks. J PEDIATR PSYCHOL, 44(9), 1074-1082. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsz046

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{56e0b515df7341eeb3cd0bcaea317d9f,
title = "Assessing Children's Eudaimonic Well-Being: The PROMIS Pediatric Meaning and Purpose Item Banks",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Meaning and Purpose item banks, child-report and parent-proxy editions.METHODS: Data were collected from two samples. The first comprised 1,895 children (8-17 years old) and 927 parents of children 5-17 years old recruited from an Internet panel, medical clinics, and schools. The second comprised a nationally representative sample of 990 children 8-17 years old and 1,292 parents of children 5-17 years old recruited from a different Internet panel. Item pool evaluation was done with Sample 1 and analyses were used to support decisions about item retention. The combined sample was used for item response theory (IRT) calibration of the item bank. Both samples were used in validation studies.RESULTS: Eleven items were deleted from the item pool because of poor psychometric performance. The final versions of the scales showed excellent reliability (>0.90). Short form scales (4 or 8 items) had a high degree of precision across over 4 SD units of the latent variable. The item bank positively correlated with extant measures of positive psychological functioning, and negatively correlated with measures of emotional distress, pessimism, and pain. Lower meaning and purpose scores were associated with adolescence and presence of a special healthcare need.CONCLUSION: The PROMIS Pediatric Meaning and Purpose item banks and their short forms are ready for use in clinical research and practice. They are measures of children's eudaimonic well-being and indicative of children's hopefulness, optimism, goal-directedness, and feelings that life is worth living.",
author = "Forrest, {Christopher B} and Bevans, {Katherine B} and Ania Filus and Janine Devine and Becker, {Brandon D} and Carle, {Adam C} and Teneralli, {Rachel E} and JeanHee Moon and Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer",
note = "{\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jpepsy/jsz046",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1074--1082",
journal = "J PEDIATR PSYCHOL",
issn = "0146-8693",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing Children's Eudaimonic Well-Being

T2 - The PROMIS Pediatric Meaning and Purpose Item Banks

AU - Forrest, Christopher B

AU - Bevans, Katherine B

AU - Filus, Ania

AU - Devine, Janine

AU - Becker, Brandon D

AU - Carle, Adam C

AU - Teneralli, Rachel E

AU - Moon, JeanHee

AU - Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike

N1 - © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Pediatric Psychology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Meaning and Purpose item banks, child-report and parent-proxy editions.METHODS: Data were collected from two samples. The first comprised 1,895 children (8-17 years old) and 927 parents of children 5-17 years old recruited from an Internet panel, medical clinics, and schools. The second comprised a nationally representative sample of 990 children 8-17 years old and 1,292 parents of children 5-17 years old recruited from a different Internet panel. Item pool evaluation was done with Sample 1 and analyses were used to support decisions about item retention. The combined sample was used for item response theory (IRT) calibration of the item bank. Both samples were used in validation studies.RESULTS: Eleven items were deleted from the item pool because of poor psychometric performance. The final versions of the scales showed excellent reliability (>0.90). Short form scales (4 or 8 items) had a high degree of precision across over 4 SD units of the latent variable. The item bank positively correlated with extant measures of positive psychological functioning, and negatively correlated with measures of emotional distress, pessimism, and pain. Lower meaning and purpose scores were associated with adolescence and presence of a special healthcare need.CONCLUSION: The PROMIS Pediatric Meaning and Purpose item banks and their short forms are ready for use in clinical research and practice. They are measures of children's eudaimonic well-being and indicative of children's hopefulness, optimism, goal-directedness, and feelings that life is worth living.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Meaning and Purpose item banks, child-report and parent-proxy editions.METHODS: Data were collected from two samples. The first comprised 1,895 children (8-17 years old) and 927 parents of children 5-17 years old recruited from an Internet panel, medical clinics, and schools. The second comprised a nationally representative sample of 990 children 8-17 years old and 1,292 parents of children 5-17 years old recruited from a different Internet panel. Item pool evaluation was done with Sample 1 and analyses were used to support decisions about item retention. The combined sample was used for item response theory (IRT) calibration of the item bank. Both samples were used in validation studies.RESULTS: Eleven items were deleted from the item pool because of poor psychometric performance. The final versions of the scales showed excellent reliability (>0.90). Short form scales (4 or 8 items) had a high degree of precision across over 4 SD units of the latent variable. The item bank positively correlated with extant measures of positive psychological functioning, and negatively correlated with measures of emotional distress, pessimism, and pain. Lower meaning and purpose scores were associated with adolescence and presence of a special healthcare need.CONCLUSION: The PROMIS Pediatric Meaning and Purpose item banks and their short forms are ready for use in clinical research and practice. They are measures of children's eudaimonic well-being and indicative of children's hopefulness, optimism, goal-directedness, and feelings that life is worth living.

U2 - 10.1093/jpepsy/jsz046

DO - 10.1093/jpepsy/jsz046

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 31233149

VL - 44

SP - 1074

EP - 1082

JO - J PEDIATR PSYCHOL

JF - J PEDIATR PSYCHOL

SN - 0146-8693

IS - 9

ER -