Are there differences between officers and ratings on merchant vessels concerning effort-reward imbalance: a cross-sectional maritime field study

Standard

Are there differences between officers and ratings on merchant vessels concerning effort-reward imbalance: a cross-sectional maritime field study. / Oldenburg, Marcus; Jensen, Hans-Joachim.

in: INT ARCH OCC ENV HEA, Jahrgang 95, Nr. 1, 01.2022, S. 131-140.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{dadcc5baecec47cb92faf48267fbd7b5,
title = "Are there differences between officers and ratings on merchant vessels concerning effort-reward imbalance: a cross-sectional maritime field study",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Today, measures to economise in the operation of ships can cause either an effort-reward imbalance or health impairments. The goal of this study was to assess the risk of effort-reward imbalance including overcommitment among officers and ratings on merchant vessels during their assignments and to evaluate lifestyle factors of seafarers as well as the health-promoting conditions on board.METHODS: A study sample of 308 male seafarers was examined during a total of 20 sea voyages on German container ships (participation rate 91.9%).RESULTS: Only 11 seafarers were identified as having an increased health risk of an effort-reward imbalance (ER ratio > 1). Officers tended to have a higher risk of an elevated ratio than ratings (4.4% vs. 3.1%) and also showed a significantly higher risk of an ER ratio above the median (58.8% vs. 41.8%; p = 0.022). Compared to land-based populations, the average overcommitment score of seafarers was high (17.9)-particularly among officers (20.3 vs. 16.5; p = 0.031). This corresponded to an elevated risk of overcommitment among officers compared to ratings (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.78-2.37). This elevated risk remained significant after adjustment for age (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.76-2.35) and job-related stressors.CONCLUSION: Although an elevated risk of effort-reward imbalance was only observed in few seafarers, this study revealed a high prevalence of overcommitment particularly among officers. In the course of time, overcommitment can lead to mental exhaustion. Therefore, shipboard health-promoting conditions need to be optimised.",
author = "Marcus Oldenburg and Hans-Joachim Jensen",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2021. The Author(s).",
year = "2022",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1007/s00420-021-01779-8",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "131--140",
journal = "INT ARCH OCC ENV HEA",
issn = "0340-0131",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are there differences between officers and ratings on merchant vessels concerning effort-reward imbalance: a cross-sectional maritime field study

AU - Oldenburg, Marcus

AU - Jensen, Hans-Joachim

N1 - © 2021. The Author(s).

PY - 2022/1

Y1 - 2022/1

N2 - PURPOSE: Today, measures to economise in the operation of ships can cause either an effort-reward imbalance or health impairments. The goal of this study was to assess the risk of effort-reward imbalance including overcommitment among officers and ratings on merchant vessels during their assignments and to evaluate lifestyle factors of seafarers as well as the health-promoting conditions on board.METHODS: A study sample of 308 male seafarers was examined during a total of 20 sea voyages on German container ships (participation rate 91.9%).RESULTS: Only 11 seafarers were identified as having an increased health risk of an effort-reward imbalance (ER ratio > 1). Officers tended to have a higher risk of an elevated ratio than ratings (4.4% vs. 3.1%) and also showed a significantly higher risk of an ER ratio above the median (58.8% vs. 41.8%; p = 0.022). Compared to land-based populations, the average overcommitment score of seafarers was high (17.9)-particularly among officers (20.3 vs. 16.5; p = 0.031). This corresponded to an elevated risk of overcommitment among officers compared to ratings (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.78-2.37). This elevated risk remained significant after adjustment for age (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.76-2.35) and job-related stressors.CONCLUSION: Although an elevated risk of effort-reward imbalance was only observed in few seafarers, this study revealed a high prevalence of overcommitment particularly among officers. In the course of time, overcommitment can lead to mental exhaustion. Therefore, shipboard health-promoting conditions need to be optimised.

AB - PURPOSE: Today, measures to economise in the operation of ships can cause either an effort-reward imbalance or health impairments. The goal of this study was to assess the risk of effort-reward imbalance including overcommitment among officers and ratings on merchant vessels during their assignments and to evaluate lifestyle factors of seafarers as well as the health-promoting conditions on board.METHODS: A study sample of 308 male seafarers was examined during a total of 20 sea voyages on German container ships (participation rate 91.9%).RESULTS: Only 11 seafarers were identified as having an increased health risk of an effort-reward imbalance (ER ratio > 1). Officers tended to have a higher risk of an elevated ratio than ratings (4.4% vs. 3.1%) and also showed a significantly higher risk of an ER ratio above the median (58.8% vs. 41.8%; p = 0.022). Compared to land-based populations, the average overcommitment score of seafarers was high (17.9)-particularly among officers (20.3 vs. 16.5; p = 0.031). This corresponded to an elevated risk of overcommitment among officers compared to ratings (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.78-2.37). This elevated risk remained significant after adjustment for age (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.76-2.35) and job-related stressors.CONCLUSION: Although an elevated risk of effort-reward imbalance was only observed in few seafarers, this study revealed a high prevalence of overcommitment particularly among officers. In the course of time, overcommitment can lead to mental exhaustion. Therefore, shipboard health-promoting conditions need to be optimised.

U2 - 10.1007/s00420-021-01779-8

DO - 10.1007/s00420-021-01779-8

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 34714395

VL - 95

SP - 131

EP - 140

JO - INT ARCH OCC ENV HEA

JF - INT ARCH OCC ENV HEA

SN - 0340-0131

IS - 1

ER -