Application of recombinant antigen 5 allergens from seven allergy-relevant Hymenoptera species in diagnostics

Standard

Application of recombinant antigen 5 allergens from seven allergy-relevant Hymenoptera species in diagnostics. / Schiener, M; Eberlein, B; Moreno-Aguilar, C; Pietsch, G; Serrano, P; McIntyre, M; Schwarze, L; Russkamp, D; Biedermann, T; Spillner, E; Darsow, U; Ollert, M; Schmidt-Weber, C B; Blank, S.

in: ALLERGY, Jahrgang 72, Nr. 1, 08.2016, S. 98-108.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Schiener, M, Eberlein, B, Moreno-Aguilar, C, Pietsch, G, Serrano, P, McIntyre, M, Schwarze, L, Russkamp, D, Biedermann, T, Spillner, E, Darsow, U, Ollert, M, Schmidt-Weber, CB & Blank, S 2016, 'Application of recombinant antigen 5 allergens from seven allergy-relevant Hymenoptera species in diagnostics', ALLERGY, Jg. 72, Nr. 1, S. 98-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13000

APA

Schiener, M., Eberlein, B., Moreno-Aguilar, C., Pietsch, G., Serrano, P., McIntyre, M., Schwarze, L., Russkamp, D., Biedermann, T., Spillner, E., Darsow, U., Ollert, M., Schmidt-Weber, C. B., & Blank, S. (2016). Application of recombinant antigen 5 allergens from seven allergy-relevant Hymenoptera species in diagnostics. ALLERGY, 72(1), 98-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13000

Vancouver

Schiener M, Eberlein B, Moreno-Aguilar C, Pietsch G, Serrano P, McIntyre M et al. Application of recombinant antigen 5 allergens from seven allergy-relevant Hymenoptera species in diagnostics. ALLERGY. 2016 Aug;72(1):98-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13000

Bibtex

@article{f5a9e9602dca499aa9b2d1ddd0e074ee,
title = "Application of recombinant antigen 5 allergens from seven allergy-relevant Hymenoptera species in diagnostics",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Hymenoptera stings can cause severe anaphylaxis in untreated venom-allergic patients. A correct diagnosis regarding the relevant species for immunotherapy is often hampered by clinically irrelevant cross-reactivity. In vespid venom allergy, cross-reactivity between venoms of different species can be a diagnostic challenge. To address immunological IgE cross-reactivity on molecular level, seven recombinant antigens 5 of the most important Vespoidea groups were assessed by different diagnostic setups.METHODS: The antigens 5 of yellow jackets, hornets, European and American paper wasps, fire ants, white-faced hornets, and Polybia wasps were recombinantly produced in insect cells, immunologically and structurally characterized, and their sIgE reactivity assessed by ImmunoCAP, ELISA, cross-inhibition, and basophil activation test (BAT) in patients with yellow jacket or Polistes venom allergy of two European geographical areas.RESULTS: All recombinant allergens were correctly folded and structural models and patient reactivity profiles suggested the presence of conserved and unique B-cell epitopes. All antigens 5 showed extensive cross-reactivity in sIgE analyses, inhibition assays, and BAT. This cross-reactivity was more pronounced in ImmunoCAP measurements with venom extracts than in sIgE analyses with recombinant antigens 5. Dose-response curves with the allergens in BAT allowed a differentiated individual dissection of relevant sensitization.CONCLUSIONS: Due to extensive cross-reactivity in various diagnostic settings, antigens 5 are inappropriate markers for differential sIgE diagnostics in vespid venom allergy. However, the newly available antigens 5 from further vespid species and the combination of recombinant allergen-based sIgE measurements with BAT represents a practicable way to diagnose clinically relevant sensitization in vespid venom allergy.",
keywords = "Allergens/chemistry, Anaphylaxis/diagnosis, Animals, Arthropod Venoms/chemistry, Basophils/immunology, Cross Reactions/immunology, Humans, Hymenoptera/immunology, Immunoglobulin E/blood, Insect Bites and Stings, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Recombinant Proteins/genetics",
author = "M Schiener and B Eberlein and C Moreno-Aguilar and G Pietsch and P Serrano and M McIntyre and L Schwarze and D Russkamp and T Biedermann and E Spillner and U Darsow and M Ollert and Schmidt-Weber, {C B} and S Blank",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2016",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1111/all.13000",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "98--108",
journal = "ALLERGY",
issn = "0105-4538",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application of recombinant antigen 5 allergens from seven allergy-relevant Hymenoptera species in diagnostics

AU - Schiener, M

AU - Eberlein, B

AU - Moreno-Aguilar, C

AU - Pietsch, G

AU - Serrano, P

AU - McIntyre, M

AU - Schwarze, L

AU - Russkamp, D

AU - Biedermann, T

AU - Spillner, E

AU - Darsow, U

AU - Ollert, M

AU - Schmidt-Weber, C B

AU - Blank, S

N1 - © 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2016/8

Y1 - 2016/8

N2 - BACKGROUND: Hymenoptera stings can cause severe anaphylaxis in untreated venom-allergic patients. A correct diagnosis regarding the relevant species for immunotherapy is often hampered by clinically irrelevant cross-reactivity. In vespid venom allergy, cross-reactivity between venoms of different species can be a diagnostic challenge. To address immunological IgE cross-reactivity on molecular level, seven recombinant antigens 5 of the most important Vespoidea groups were assessed by different diagnostic setups.METHODS: The antigens 5 of yellow jackets, hornets, European and American paper wasps, fire ants, white-faced hornets, and Polybia wasps were recombinantly produced in insect cells, immunologically and structurally characterized, and their sIgE reactivity assessed by ImmunoCAP, ELISA, cross-inhibition, and basophil activation test (BAT) in patients with yellow jacket or Polistes venom allergy of two European geographical areas.RESULTS: All recombinant allergens were correctly folded and structural models and patient reactivity profiles suggested the presence of conserved and unique B-cell epitopes. All antigens 5 showed extensive cross-reactivity in sIgE analyses, inhibition assays, and BAT. This cross-reactivity was more pronounced in ImmunoCAP measurements with venom extracts than in sIgE analyses with recombinant antigens 5. Dose-response curves with the allergens in BAT allowed a differentiated individual dissection of relevant sensitization.CONCLUSIONS: Due to extensive cross-reactivity in various diagnostic settings, antigens 5 are inappropriate markers for differential sIgE diagnostics in vespid venom allergy. However, the newly available antigens 5 from further vespid species and the combination of recombinant allergen-based sIgE measurements with BAT represents a practicable way to diagnose clinically relevant sensitization in vespid venom allergy.

AB - BACKGROUND: Hymenoptera stings can cause severe anaphylaxis in untreated venom-allergic patients. A correct diagnosis regarding the relevant species for immunotherapy is often hampered by clinically irrelevant cross-reactivity. In vespid venom allergy, cross-reactivity between venoms of different species can be a diagnostic challenge. To address immunological IgE cross-reactivity on molecular level, seven recombinant antigens 5 of the most important Vespoidea groups were assessed by different diagnostic setups.METHODS: The antigens 5 of yellow jackets, hornets, European and American paper wasps, fire ants, white-faced hornets, and Polybia wasps were recombinantly produced in insect cells, immunologically and structurally characterized, and their sIgE reactivity assessed by ImmunoCAP, ELISA, cross-inhibition, and basophil activation test (BAT) in patients with yellow jacket or Polistes venom allergy of two European geographical areas.RESULTS: All recombinant allergens were correctly folded and structural models and patient reactivity profiles suggested the presence of conserved and unique B-cell epitopes. All antigens 5 showed extensive cross-reactivity in sIgE analyses, inhibition assays, and BAT. This cross-reactivity was more pronounced in ImmunoCAP measurements with venom extracts than in sIgE analyses with recombinant antigens 5. Dose-response curves with the allergens in BAT allowed a differentiated individual dissection of relevant sensitization.CONCLUSIONS: Due to extensive cross-reactivity in various diagnostic settings, antigens 5 are inappropriate markers for differential sIgE diagnostics in vespid venom allergy. However, the newly available antigens 5 from further vespid species and the combination of recombinant allergen-based sIgE measurements with BAT represents a practicable way to diagnose clinically relevant sensitization in vespid venom allergy.

KW - Allergens/chemistry

KW - Anaphylaxis/diagnosis

KW - Animals

KW - Arthropod Venoms/chemistry

KW - Basophils/immunology

KW - Cross Reactions/immunology

KW - Humans

KW - Hymenoptera/immunology

KW - Immunoglobulin E/blood

KW - Insect Bites and Stings

KW - Models, Molecular

KW - Protein Conformation

KW - Recombinant Proteins/genetics

U2 - 10.1111/all.13000

DO - 10.1111/all.13000

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 27496543

VL - 72

SP - 98

EP - 108

JO - ALLERGY

JF - ALLERGY

SN - 0105-4538

IS - 1

ER -