Application of Cervical Collars - An Analysis of Practical Skills of Professional Emergency Medical Care Providers
Standard
Application of Cervical Collars - An Analysis of Practical Skills of Professional Emergency Medical Care Providers. / Kreinest, Michael; Goller, Sarah; Rauch, Geraldine; Frank, Christian; Gliwitzky, Bernhard; Wölfl, Christoph G; Matschke, Stefan; Münzberg, Matthias.
in: PLOS ONE, Jahrgang 10, Nr. 11, 20.11.2015, S. e0143409.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of Cervical Collars - An Analysis of Practical Skills of Professional Emergency Medical Care Providers
AU - Kreinest, Michael
AU - Goller, Sarah
AU - Rauch, Geraldine
AU - Frank, Christian
AU - Gliwitzky, Bernhard
AU - Wölfl, Christoph G
AU - Matschke, Stefan
AU - Münzberg, Matthias
PY - 2015/11/20
Y1 - 2015/11/20
N2 - BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The application of a cervical collar is a standard procedure in trauma patients in emergency medicine. It is often observed that cervical collars are applied incorrectly, resulting in reduced immobilization of the cervical spine. The objective of this study was to analyze the practical skills of trained professional rescue personnel concerning the application of cervical collars.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Within emergency medical conferences, n = 104 voluntary test subjects were asked to apply a cervical collar to a training doll, wherein each step that was performed received an evaluation. Furthermore, personal and occupational data of all study participants were collected using a questionnaire.RESULTS: The test subjects included professional rescue personnel (80.8%) and emergency physicians (12.5%). The average occupational experience of all study participants in pre-clinical emergency care was 11.1±8.9 years. Most study participants had already attended a certified training on trauma care (61%) and felt "very confident" in handling a cervical collar (84%). 11% applied the cervical collar to the training doll without errors. The most common error consisted of incorrect adjustment of the size of the cervical collar (66%). No association was found between the correct application of the cervical collar and the occupational group of the test subjects (trained rescue personnel vs. emergency physicians) or the participation in certified trauma courses.CONCLUSION: Despite pronounced subjective confidence regarding the application of cervical collars, this study allows the conclusion that there are general deficits in practical skills when cervical collars are applied. A critical assessment of the current training contents on the subject of trauma care must, therefore, be demanded.
AB - BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The application of a cervical collar is a standard procedure in trauma patients in emergency medicine. It is often observed that cervical collars are applied incorrectly, resulting in reduced immobilization of the cervical spine. The objective of this study was to analyze the practical skills of trained professional rescue personnel concerning the application of cervical collars.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Within emergency medical conferences, n = 104 voluntary test subjects were asked to apply a cervical collar to a training doll, wherein each step that was performed received an evaluation. Furthermore, personal and occupational data of all study participants were collected using a questionnaire.RESULTS: The test subjects included professional rescue personnel (80.8%) and emergency physicians (12.5%). The average occupational experience of all study participants in pre-clinical emergency care was 11.1±8.9 years. Most study participants had already attended a certified training on trauma care (61%) and felt "very confident" in handling a cervical collar (84%). 11% applied the cervical collar to the training doll without errors. The most common error consisted of incorrect adjustment of the size of the cervical collar (66%). No association was found between the correct application of the cervical collar and the occupational group of the test subjects (trained rescue personnel vs. emergency physicians) or the participation in certified trauma courses.CONCLUSION: Despite pronounced subjective confidence regarding the application of cervical collars, this study allows the conclusion that there are general deficits in practical skills when cervical collars are applied. A critical assessment of the current training contents on the subject of trauma care must, therefore, be demanded.
KW - Adult
KW - Braces
KW - Cervical Vertebrae
KW - Clinical Competence
KW - Emergency Medical Services
KW - Emergency Medical Technicians
KW - Female
KW - Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
KW - Health Personnel
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Manikins
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Range of Motion, Articular
KW - Splints
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0143409
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0143409
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 26587650
VL - 10
SP - e0143409
JO - PLOS ONE
JF - PLOS ONE
SN - 1932-6203
IS - 11
ER -