[An abbreviated version of RDC/TMD]

Standard

[An abbreviated version of RDC/TMD]. / Reißmann, Daniel; John, M T; Schierz, O; Hirsch, C.

in: SCHMERZ, Jahrgang 23, Nr. 6, 6, 2009, S. 618-627.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Reißmann, D, John, MT, Schierz, O & Hirsch, C 2009, '[An abbreviated version of RDC/TMD]', SCHMERZ, Jg. 23, Nr. 6, 6, S. 618-627. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19838739?dopt=Citation>

APA

Reißmann, D., John, M. T., Schierz, O., & Hirsch, C. (2009). [An abbreviated version of RDC/TMD]. SCHMERZ, 23(6), 618-627. [6]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19838739?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Reißmann D, John MT, Schierz O, Hirsch C. [An abbreviated version of RDC/TMD]. SCHMERZ. 2009;23(6):618-627. 6.

Bibtex

@article{15033dc3b9374bcda0a202a7c32d5d50,
title = "[An abbreviated version of RDC/TMD]",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a short diagnostic test for pain-related craniomandibular disorders (CMD) based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Participants included 1,177 CMD patients and 896 general population subjects who were examined according to the RDC/TMD. This new diagnostic short test consisted of a combination of the least amount of RDC/TMD items that distinguished between patients and subjects with a sensitivity of > or =70% and a specificity of > or =90%. The diagnostic test items were selected from all available RDC/TMD items using best subset logistic regression. RESULTS: The question about the presence of facial pain achieved a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 95%. The lower limits of the confidence interval for test accuracy measures exceeded the postulated thresholds specified for test development. Assuming a CMD pain prevalence of 10% in the general population this short test resulted in a positive predictive value of 80% and a negative predictive value of >99%. CONCLUSION: A single question about facial pain is a strong predictor for a pain-related CMD disorder and could provide an effective CMD short test.",
author = "Daniel Rei{\ss}mann and John, {M T} and O Schierz and C Hirsch",
year = "2009",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "23",
pages = "618--627",
journal = "SCHMERZ",
issn = "0932-433X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - [An abbreviated version of RDC/TMD]

AU - Reißmann, Daniel

AU - John, M T

AU - Schierz, O

AU - Hirsch, C

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a short diagnostic test for pain-related craniomandibular disorders (CMD) based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Participants included 1,177 CMD patients and 896 general population subjects who were examined according to the RDC/TMD. This new diagnostic short test consisted of a combination of the least amount of RDC/TMD items that distinguished between patients and subjects with a sensitivity of > or =70% and a specificity of > or =90%. The diagnostic test items were selected from all available RDC/TMD items using best subset logistic regression. RESULTS: The question about the presence of facial pain achieved a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 95%. The lower limits of the confidence interval for test accuracy measures exceeded the postulated thresholds specified for test development. Assuming a CMD pain prevalence of 10% in the general population this short test resulted in a positive predictive value of 80% and a negative predictive value of >99%. CONCLUSION: A single question about facial pain is a strong predictor for a pain-related CMD disorder and could provide an effective CMD short test.

AB - BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a short diagnostic test for pain-related craniomandibular disorders (CMD) based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Participants included 1,177 CMD patients and 896 general population subjects who were examined according to the RDC/TMD. This new diagnostic short test consisted of a combination of the least amount of RDC/TMD items that distinguished between patients and subjects with a sensitivity of > or =70% and a specificity of > or =90%. The diagnostic test items were selected from all available RDC/TMD items using best subset logistic regression. RESULTS: The question about the presence of facial pain achieved a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 95%. The lower limits of the confidence interval for test accuracy measures exceeded the postulated thresholds specified for test development. Assuming a CMD pain prevalence of 10% in the general population this short test resulted in a positive predictive value of 80% and a negative predictive value of >99%. CONCLUSION: A single question about facial pain is a strong predictor for a pain-related CMD disorder and could provide an effective CMD short test.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 23

SP - 618

EP - 627

JO - SCHMERZ

JF - SCHMERZ

SN - 0932-433X

IS - 6

M1 - 6

ER -