Advances in therapeutic endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones.

Standard

Advances in therapeutic endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones. / Seitz, U; Bapaye, A; Bohnacker, Sabine; Navarrete, C; Maydeo, A; Soehendra, N.

in: WORLD J SURG, Jahrgang 22, Nr. 11, 11, 1998, S. 1133-1144.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Seitz, U, Bapaye, A, Bohnacker, S, Navarrete, C, Maydeo, A & Soehendra, N 1998, 'Advances in therapeutic endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones.', WORLD J SURG, Jg. 22, Nr. 11, 11, S. 1133-1144. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9828721?dopt=Citation>

APA

Seitz, U., Bapaye, A., Bohnacker, S., Navarrete, C., Maydeo, A., & Soehendra, N. (1998). Advances in therapeutic endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones. WORLD J SURG, 22(11), 1133-1144. [11]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9828721?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Seitz U, Bapaye A, Bohnacker S, Navarrete C, Maydeo A, Soehendra N. Advances in therapeutic endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones. WORLD J SURG. 1998;22(11):1133-1144. 11.

Bibtex

@article{690cc9f40c654e10a5feea432aff5ef6,
title = "Advances in therapeutic endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones.",
abstract = "Advances in cannulation techniques and instruments have helped in difficult bile duct cannulation and thus stone extraction. For small common bile duct (CBD) stones, endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation has been proposed as an alternative to endoscopic papillotomy (EPT). The technique must undergo further evaluation before recommending its routine use. For most patients with bile duct stones, EPT remains the method of choice. Out of 8204 patients treated in three surgical endoscopy centers (Chile, Germany, and India), 86% to 91% of all CBD stones could be extracted subsequently after EPT using a Dormia basket; 4% to 7% required mechanical lithotripsy (ML) before removal and 3% to 10% of the patients needed other sophisticated techniques, such as electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), laser-induced shock-wave lithotripsy (LISL), or extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). The local expertise and availability of equipment determines the choice of method used. In general, EHL or LISL is used for impacted CBD stones including stones in Mirizzi syndrome refractory to ML. ESWL is best suited for intrahepatic stones. Permanent stenting can be offered to poor risk patients instead of extensive procedures to clear the bile duct. Using currently available nonsurgical techniques, fewer than 1% of all patients with bile duct stones still require surgical intervention.",
author = "U Seitz and A Bapaye and Sabine Bohnacker and C Navarrete and A Maydeo and N Soehendra",
year = "1998",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "22",
pages = "1133--1144",
journal = "WORLD J SURG",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advances in therapeutic endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones.

AU - Seitz, U

AU - Bapaye, A

AU - Bohnacker, Sabine

AU - Navarrete, C

AU - Maydeo, A

AU - Soehendra, N

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Advances in cannulation techniques and instruments have helped in difficult bile duct cannulation and thus stone extraction. For small common bile duct (CBD) stones, endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation has been proposed as an alternative to endoscopic papillotomy (EPT). The technique must undergo further evaluation before recommending its routine use. For most patients with bile duct stones, EPT remains the method of choice. Out of 8204 patients treated in three surgical endoscopy centers (Chile, Germany, and India), 86% to 91% of all CBD stones could be extracted subsequently after EPT using a Dormia basket; 4% to 7% required mechanical lithotripsy (ML) before removal and 3% to 10% of the patients needed other sophisticated techniques, such as electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), laser-induced shock-wave lithotripsy (LISL), or extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). The local expertise and availability of equipment determines the choice of method used. In general, EHL or LISL is used for impacted CBD stones including stones in Mirizzi syndrome refractory to ML. ESWL is best suited for intrahepatic stones. Permanent stenting can be offered to poor risk patients instead of extensive procedures to clear the bile duct. Using currently available nonsurgical techniques, fewer than 1% of all patients with bile duct stones still require surgical intervention.

AB - Advances in cannulation techniques and instruments have helped in difficult bile duct cannulation and thus stone extraction. For small common bile duct (CBD) stones, endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation has been proposed as an alternative to endoscopic papillotomy (EPT). The technique must undergo further evaluation before recommending its routine use. For most patients with bile duct stones, EPT remains the method of choice. Out of 8204 patients treated in three surgical endoscopy centers (Chile, Germany, and India), 86% to 91% of all CBD stones could be extracted subsequently after EPT using a Dormia basket; 4% to 7% required mechanical lithotripsy (ML) before removal and 3% to 10% of the patients needed other sophisticated techniques, such as electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), laser-induced shock-wave lithotripsy (LISL), or extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). The local expertise and availability of equipment determines the choice of method used. In general, EHL or LISL is used for impacted CBD stones including stones in Mirizzi syndrome refractory to ML. ESWL is best suited for intrahepatic stones. Permanent stenting can be offered to poor risk patients instead of extensive procedures to clear the bile duct. Using currently available nonsurgical techniques, fewer than 1% of all patients with bile duct stones still require surgical intervention.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 22

SP - 1133

EP - 1144

JO - WORLD J SURG

JF - WORLD J SURG

SN - 0364-2313

IS - 11

M1 - 11

ER -