[Admission status of alcohol and drug-dependent patients in "high threshold" access to withdrawal treatment]

Standard

[Admission status of alcohol and drug-dependent patients in "high threshold" access to withdrawal treatment]. / Wagner, H B; Schwoon, Dirk; Lambert, Martin; Krausz, M.

in: PSYCHIAT PRAX, Jahrgang 26, Nr. 1, 1, 1999, S. 25-28.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{1aca421cf06f495e9f28799b7557f881,
title = "[Admission status of alcohol and drug-dependent patients in {"}high threshold{"} access to withdrawal treatment]",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: 106 patients (64.2% male and 35.8% female) who applied for a withdrawal treatment by phone call, were interviewed concerning the admission context with the aim to find out whether the admission regulations prevent patients from undergoing treatment. RESULTS: 72.6% of all patients were admitted as inpatients. The average waiting period was 8 days. 15.1% were known to have previously suffered from conclusions and 4.7% from delirium tremens; for these patients, the waiting period was significantly shorter. CONCLUSIONS: High-threshold admission is not an insurmountable difficulty. Waiting periods and soberness at admission are accepted. Setting up admission conditions is, on the one hand, justified, whereas on the other hand chronic patients are often not reached. Telephone contacts with patients willing to undergo treatment should be replaced by contacts in an outpatient setting.",
author = "Wagner, {H B} and Dirk Schwoon and Martin Lambert and M Krausz",
year = "1999",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "26",
pages = "25--28",
journal = "PSYCHIAT PRAX",
issn = "0303-4259",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag KG",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - [Admission status of alcohol and drug-dependent patients in "high threshold" access to withdrawal treatment]

AU - Wagner, H B

AU - Schwoon, Dirk

AU - Lambert, Martin

AU - Krausz, M

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: 106 patients (64.2% male and 35.8% female) who applied for a withdrawal treatment by phone call, were interviewed concerning the admission context with the aim to find out whether the admission regulations prevent patients from undergoing treatment. RESULTS: 72.6% of all patients were admitted as inpatients. The average waiting period was 8 days. 15.1% were known to have previously suffered from conclusions and 4.7% from delirium tremens; for these patients, the waiting period was significantly shorter. CONCLUSIONS: High-threshold admission is not an insurmountable difficulty. Waiting periods and soberness at admission are accepted. Setting up admission conditions is, on the one hand, justified, whereas on the other hand chronic patients are often not reached. Telephone contacts with patients willing to undergo treatment should be replaced by contacts in an outpatient setting.

AB - OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: 106 patients (64.2% male and 35.8% female) who applied for a withdrawal treatment by phone call, were interviewed concerning the admission context with the aim to find out whether the admission regulations prevent patients from undergoing treatment. RESULTS: 72.6% of all patients were admitted as inpatients. The average waiting period was 8 days. 15.1% were known to have previously suffered from conclusions and 4.7% from delirium tremens; for these patients, the waiting period was significantly shorter. CONCLUSIONS: High-threshold admission is not an insurmountable difficulty. Waiting periods and soberness at admission are accepted. Setting up admission conditions is, on the one hand, justified, whereas on the other hand chronic patients are often not reached. Telephone contacts with patients willing to undergo treatment should be replaced by contacts in an outpatient setting.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 26

SP - 25

EP - 28

JO - PSYCHIAT PRAX

JF - PSYCHIAT PRAX

SN - 0303-4259

IS - 1

M1 - 1

ER -