[Adjuvant therapy in colon cancer].

Standard

[Adjuvant therapy in colon cancer]. / Reinacher-Schick, Anke; Arnold, Dirk; Trarbach, Tanja; Ridwelski, Karsten; Bruch, Hans-Peter; Kirchner, Thomas; Kubicka, Stefan; Schmoll, Hans-Joachim.

in: ONKOLOGIE, Jahrgang 33 Suppl 4, 2010, S. 2-7.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Reinacher-Schick, A, Arnold, D, Trarbach, T, Ridwelski, K, Bruch, H-P, Kirchner, T, Kubicka, S & Schmoll, H-J 2010, '[Adjuvant therapy in colon cancer].', ONKOLOGIE, Jg. 33 Suppl 4, S. 2-7. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20431306?dopt=Citation>

APA

Reinacher-Schick, A., Arnold, D., Trarbach, T., Ridwelski, K., Bruch, H-P., Kirchner, T., Kubicka, S., & Schmoll, H-J. (2010). [Adjuvant therapy in colon cancer]. ONKOLOGIE, 33 Suppl 4, 2-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20431306?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Reinacher-Schick A, Arnold D, Trarbach T, Ridwelski K, Bruch H-P, Kirchner T et al. [Adjuvant therapy in colon cancer]. ONKOLOGIE. 2010;33 Suppl 4:2-7.

Bibtex

@article{1d7dc514cef64af883a8aa6c23d6d2a4,
title = "[Adjuvant therapy in colon cancer].",
abstract = "The goal of improving adjuvant treatment can be reached in two ways: firstly, by developing more effective drugs and protocols and, secondly, by selecting suitable patients on the basis of clinical and molecular factors. In UICC (Union internationale contre le cancer) stage II, microsatellite instability (MSI) is a strong prognostic factor. Whether it can also be used as a predictive marker is currently a matter of controversy because the available data are contradictory. The question whether or not the MSI status should be checked before treatment decisions are made in stage II patients can therefore not be clearly answered at present. For adjuvant treatment in stage III, with capecitabine/oxaliplatin (XELOX) there is now a new protocol available that is based on the orally administered prodrug capecitabine. With regard to the question of how much older patients in this stage may also benefit from a combination chemotherapy, new--and contradictory--data have emerged recently: firstly, preliminary results of two new studies have given rise to safety concerns and, secondly, an analysis by the 'ACCENT Collaborative Group' indicated lower efficacy of the 'newer' adjuvant protocols in older people. These findings, however, have now been called into question as a result of a new subgroup analysis from the XELOXA study. The expert group therefore recommended that the decision whether to treat patients older than 70 years with an (oral) fluoropyrimidine alone or in combination with oxaliplatin should be based on clinical parameters such as biological age and comorbidities.",
keywords = "Humans, Aged, dosage, Prognosis, Combined Modality Therapy, Clinical Trials as Topic, Neoplasm Staging, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Fluorouracil administration, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration, Colonic Neoplasms drug therapy, Deoxycytidine administration, Microsatellite Instability, Humans, Aged, dosage, Prognosis, Combined Modality Therapy, Clinical Trials as Topic, Neoplasm Staging, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Fluorouracil administration, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration, Colonic Neoplasms drug therapy, Deoxycytidine administration, Microsatellite Instability",
author = "Anke Reinacher-Schick and Dirk Arnold and Tanja Trarbach and Karsten Ridwelski and Hans-Peter Bruch and Thomas Kirchner and Stefan Kubicka and Hans-Joachim Schmoll",
year = "2010",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "33 Suppl 4",
pages = "2--7",
journal = "ONKOLOGIE",
issn = "0378-584X",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - [Adjuvant therapy in colon cancer].

AU - Reinacher-Schick, Anke

AU - Arnold, Dirk

AU - Trarbach, Tanja

AU - Ridwelski, Karsten

AU - Bruch, Hans-Peter

AU - Kirchner, Thomas

AU - Kubicka, Stefan

AU - Schmoll, Hans-Joachim

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The goal of improving adjuvant treatment can be reached in two ways: firstly, by developing more effective drugs and protocols and, secondly, by selecting suitable patients on the basis of clinical and molecular factors. In UICC (Union internationale contre le cancer) stage II, microsatellite instability (MSI) is a strong prognostic factor. Whether it can also be used as a predictive marker is currently a matter of controversy because the available data are contradictory. The question whether or not the MSI status should be checked before treatment decisions are made in stage II patients can therefore not be clearly answered at present. For adjuvant treatment in stage III, with capecitabine/oxaliplatin (XELOX) there is now a new protocol available that is based on the orally administered prodrug capecitabine. With regard to the question of how much older patients in this stage may also benefit from a combination chemotherapy, new--and contradictory--data have emerged recently: firstly, preliminary results of two new studies have given rise to safety concerns and, secondly, an analysis by the 'ACCENT Collaborative Group' indicated lower efficacy of the 'newer' adjuvant protocols in older people. These findings, however, have now been called into question as a result of a new subgroup analysis from the XELOXA study. The expert group therefore recommended that the decision whether to treat patients older than 70 years with an (oral) fluoropyrimidine alone or in combination with oxaliplatin should be based on clinical parameters such as biological age and comorbidities.

AB - The goal of improving adjuvant treatment can be reached in two ways: firstly, by developing more effective drugs and protocols and, secondly, by selecting suitable patients on the basis of clinical and molecular factors. In UICC (Union internationale contre le cancer) stage II, microsatellite instability (MSI) is a strong prognostic factor. Whether it can also be used as a predictive marker is currently a matter of controversy because the available data are contradictory. The question whether or not the MSI status should be checked before treatment decisions are made in stage II patients can therefore not be clearly answered at present. For adjuvant treatment in stage III, with capecitabine/oxaliplatin (XELOX) there is now a new protocol available that is based on the orally administered prodrug capecitabine. With regard to the question of how much older patients in this stage may also benefit from a combination chemotherapy, new--and contradictory--data have emerged recently: firstly, preliminary results of two new studies have given rise to safety concerns and, secondly, an analysis by the 'ACCENT Collaborative Group' indicated lower efficacy of the 'newer' adjuvant protocols in older people. These findings, however, have now been called into question as a result of a new subgroup analysis from the XELOXA study. The expert group therefore recommended that the decision whether to treat patients older than 70 years with an (oral) fluoropyrimidine alone or in combination with oxaliplatin should be based on clinical parameters such as biological age and comorbidities.

KW - Humans

KW - Aged

KW - dosage

KW - Prognosis

KW - Combined Modality Therapy

KW - Clinical Trials as Topic

KW - Neoplasm Staging

KW - Chemotherapy, Adjuvant

KW - Fluorouracil administration

KW - Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration

KW - Colonic Neoplasms drug therapy

KW - Deoxycytidine administration

KW - Microsatellite Instability

KW - Humans

KW - Aged

KW - dosage

KW - Prognosis

KW - Combined Modality Therapy

KW - Clinical Trials as Topic

KW - Neoplasm Staging

KW - Chemotherapy, Adjuvant

KW - Fluorouracil administration

KW - Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration

KW - Colonic Neoplasms drug therapy

KW - Deoxycytidine administration

KW - Microsatellite Instability

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 33 Suppl 4

SP - 2

EP - 7

JO - ONKOLOGIE

JF - ONKOLOGIE

SN - 0378-584X

ER -