Adjuvant radiation therapy is associated with better oncological outcome compared with salvage radiation therapy in patients with pN1 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy

Standard

Adjuvant radiation therapy is associated with better oncological outcome compared with salvage radiation therapy in patients with pN1 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. / Tilki, Derya; Preisser, Felix; Tennstedt, Pierre; Tober, Patrick; Mandel, Philipp; Schlomm, Thorsten; Steuber, Thomas; Huland, Hartwig; Schwarz, Rudolf; Petersen, Cordula; Graefen, Markus; Ahyai, Sascha.

in: BJU INT, Jahrgang 119, Nr. 5, 05.2017, S. 717-723.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{63b2fff4eb504f5a9b098e861f5f96b1,
title = "Adjuvant radiation therapy is associated with better oncological outcome compared with salvage radiation therapy in patients with pN1 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To analyse the comparative effectiveness of no treatment (NT) or salvage radiation therapy (sRT) at biochemical recurrence (BCR) vs adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) in patients with lymph node (LN)-positive prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP).PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 773 patients with LN-positive PCa at RP, with or without additional radiation therapy (RT), in the period 2005-2013, were retrospectively analysed. Cox regression analysis was used to assess factors influencing BCR and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Propensity score-matched analyses were performed.RESULTS: The median follow-up for the entire patient group was 33.8 months. Four-year BCR-free and MFS rates were 43.3% and 86.6%, respectively, for all patients. In multivariate analysis, NT/sRT (n = 505) was an independent risk factor for BCR and metastasis compared with aRT (n = 213). The superiority of aRT was confirmed after propensity score matching. The 4-year MFS in the matched cohort was 82.5% vs 91.8% for the NT/sRT and aRT groups, respectively (P = 0.02). Early sRT (pre-RT prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≤0.5 ng/mL) compared with sRT at PSA >0.5 ng/mL was significantly associated with a lower risk of metastasis.CONCLUSION: Patients with LN-positive PCa who received aRT had a significantly better oncological outcome than patients with NT/sRT, independent of tumour characteristics. Patients with early sRT had higher rates of response and better MFS than patients with pre-RT PSA >0.5 ng/mL.",
author = "Derya Tilki and Felix Preisser and Pierre Tennstedt and Patrick Tober and Philipp Mandel and Thorsten Schlomm and Thomas Steuber and Hartwig Huland and Rudolf Schwarz and Cordula Petersen and Markus Graefen and Sascha Ahyai",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2016 The Authors BJU International {\textcopyright} 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2017",
month = may,
doi = "10.1111/bju.13679",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
pages = "717--723",
journal = "BJU INT",
issn = "1464-4096",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adjuvant radiation therapy is associated with better oncological outcome compared with salvage radiation therapy in patients with pN1 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy

AU - Tilki, Derya

AU - Preisser, Felix

AU - Tennstedt, Pierre

AU - Tober, Patrick

AU - Mandel, Philipp

AU - Schlomm, Thorsten

AU - Steuber, Thomas

AU - Huland, Hartwig

AU - Schwarz, Rudolf

AU - Petersen, Cordula

AU - Graefen, Markus

AU - Ahyai, Sascha

N1 - © 2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2017/5

Y1 - 2017/5

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To analyse the comparative effectiveness of no treatment (NT) or salvage radiation therapy (sRT) at biochemical recurrence (BCR) vs adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) in patients with lymph node (LN)-positive prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP).PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 773 patients with LN-positive PCa at RP, with or without additional radiation therapy (RT), in the period 2005-2013, were retrospectively analysed. Cox regression analysis was used to assess factors influencing BCR and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Propensity score-matched analyses were performed.RESULTS: The median follow-up for the entire patient group was 33.8 months. Four-year BCR-free and MFS rates were 43.3% and 86.6%, respectively, for all patients. In multivariate analysis, NT/sRT (n = 505) was an independent risk factor for BCR and metastasis compared with aRT (n = 213). The superiority of aRT was confirmed after propensity score matching. The 4-year MFS in the matched cohort was 82.5% vs 91.8% for the NT/sRT and aRT groups, respectively (P = 0.02). Early sRT (pre-RT prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≤0.5 ng/mL) compared with sRT at PSA >0.5 ng/mL was significantly associated with a lower risk of metastasis.CONCLUSION: Patients with LN-positive PCa who received aRT had a significantly better oncological outcome than patients with NT/sRT, independent of tumour characteristics. Patients with early sRT had higher rates of response and better MFS than patients with pre-RT PSA >0.5 ng/mL.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To analyse the comparative effectiveness of no treatment (NT) or salvage radiation therapy (sRT) at biochemical recurrence (BCR) vs adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) in patients with lymph node (LN)-positive prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP).PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 773 patients with LN-positive PCa at RP, with or without additional radiation therapy (RT), in the period 2005-2013, were retrospectively analysed. Cox regression analysis was used to assess factors influencing BCR and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Propensity score-matched analyses were performed.RESULTS: The median follow-up for the entire patient group was 33.8 months. Four-year BCR-free and MFS rates were 43.3% and 86.6%, respectively, for all patients. In multivariate analysis, NT/sRT (n = 505) was an independent risk factor for BCR and metastasis compared with aRT (n = 213). The superiority of aRT was confirmed after propensity score matching. The 4-year MFS in the matched cohort was 82.5% vs 91.8% for the NT/sRT and aRT groups, respectively (P = 0.02). Early sRT (pre-RT prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≤0.5 ng/mL) compared with sRT at PSA >0.5 ng/mL was significantly associated with a lower risk of metastasis.CONCLUSION: Patients with LN-positive PCa who received aRT had a significantly better oncological outcome than patients with NT/sRT, independent of tumour characteristics. Patients with early sRT had higher rates of response and better MFS than patients with pre-RT PSA >0.5 ng/mL.

U2 - 10.1111/bju.13679

DO - 10.1111/bju.13679

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 27743493

VL - 119

SP - 717

EP - 723

JO - BJU INT

JF - BJU INT

SN - 1464-4096

IS - 5

ER -