Absolute cardiovascular disease risk and shared decision making in primary care: a randomized controlled trial.
Standard
Absolute cardiovascular disease risk and shared decision making in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. / Krones, Tanja; Keller, Heidemarie; Sönnichsen, Andreas; Sadowski, Eva-Maria; Baum, Erika; Wegscheider, Karl; Rochon, Justine; Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert.
in: ANN FAM MED, Jahrgang 6, Nr. 3, 3, 2008, S. 218-227.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Absolute cardiovascular disease risk and shared decision making in primary care: a randomized controlled trial.
AU - Krones, Tanja
AU - Keller, Heidemarie
AU - Sönnichsen, Andreas
AU - Sadowski, Eva-Maria
AU - Baum, Erika
AU - Wegscheider, Karl
AU - Rochon, Justine
AU - Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - PURPOSE: We wanted to determine the effect of promoting the effective communication of absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and shared decision making through disseminating a simple decision aid for use in family practice consultations. METHODS: The study was based on a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial (phase III) with continuing medical education (CME) groups of family physicians as the unit of randomization. In the intervention arm, 44 physicians (7 CME groups) consecutively recruited 550 patients in whom cholesterol levels were measured. Forty-seven physicians in the control arm (7 CME groups) similarly included 582 patients. Four hundred sixty patients (83.6%) of the intervention arm and 466 patients (80.1%) of the control arm were seen at follow-up. Physicians attended 2 interactive CME sessions and received a booklet, a paper-based risk calculator, and individual summary sheets for each patient. Control physicians attended 1 CME-session on an alternative topic. Main outcome measures were patient satisfaction and participation after the index consultation, change in CVD risk status, and decisional regret at 6 months' follow-up. RESULTS: Intervention patients were significantly more satisfied with process and result (Patient Participation Scale, difference 0.80, P
AB - PURPOSE: We wanted to determine the effect of promoting the effective communication of absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and shared decision making through disseminating a simple decision aid for use in family practice consultations. METHODS: The study was based on a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial (phase III) with continuing medical education (CME) groups of family physicians as the unit of randomization. In the intervention arm, 44 physicians (7 CME groups) consecutively recruited 550 patients in whom cholesterol levels were measured. Forty-seven physicians in the control arm (7 CME groups) similarly included 582 patients. Four hundred sixty patients (83.6%) of the intervention arm and 466 patients (80.1%) of the control arm were seen at follow-up. Physicians attended 2 interactive CME sessions and received a booklet, a paper-based risk calculator, and individual summary sheets for each patient. Control physicians attended 1 CME-session on an alternative topic. Main outcome measures were patient satisfaction and participation after the index consultation, change in CVD risk status, and decisional regret at 6 months' follow-up. RESULTS: Intervention patients were significantly more satisfied with process and result (Patient Participation Scale, difference 0.80, P
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
VL - 6
SP - 218
EP - 227
JO - ANN FAM MED
JF - ANN FAM MED
SN - 1544-1709
IS - 3
M1 - 3
ER -
