A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties

Standard

A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties. / Zapf, Holger; Boettcher, Johannes; Haukeland, Yngvild; Orm, Stian; Coslar, Sarah; Wiegand-Grefe, Silke; Fjermestad, Krister.

in: CLIN CHILD FAM PSYCH, Jahrgang 26, Nr. 1, 03.2023, S. 121-142.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{6441520dc87149a5ae4dcafc60ba268e,
title = "A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties",
abstract = "Parent-child communication represents an important variable in clinical child and family psychology due to its association with a variety of psychosocial outcomes. To give an overview of instruments designed to measure the quality of parent-child communication from the child's (8-21 years) perspective and to assess the psychometric quality of these instruments, we performed a systematic literature search in Medline and PsycInfo (last: February 25, 2022). Peer-reviewed journal articles published in English with a child-rated instrument measuring the quality of parent-child communication were included. Initial screening for eligibility and inclusion, subsequent data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by couples of review team members. Based on the screening of 5115 articles, 106 studies reported in 126 papers were included. We identified 12 parent-child communication instruments across the studies. The Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS) was used in 75% of the studies. On average, the evidence for psychometric quality of the instruments was low. Few instruments were used in clinical and at-risk samples. Several instruments are available to rate parent-child communication from the child's perspective. However, their psychometric evidence is limited and the theoretical foundation is largely undocumented. This review has limitations with regard to selection criteria and language bias.Registration PROSPERO: CRD42021255264.",
author = "Holger Zapf and Johannes Boettcher and Yngvild Haukeland and Stian Orm and Sarah Coslar and Silke Wiegand-Grefe and Krister Fjermestad",
year = "2023",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1007/s10567-022-00414-3",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "121--142",
journal = "CLIN CHILD FAM PSYCH",
issn = "1096-4037",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Systematic Review of Parent–Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties

AU - Zapf, Holger

AU - Boettcher, Johannes

AU - Haukeland, Yngvild

AU - Orm, Stian

AU - Coslar, Sarah

AU - Wiegand-Grefe, Silke

AU - Fjermestad, Krister

PY - 2023/3

Y1 - 2023/3

N2 - Parent-child communication represents an important variable in clinical child and family psychology due to its association with a variety of psychosocial outcomes. To give an overview of instruments designed to measure the quality of parent-child communication from the child's (8-21 years) perspective and to assess the psychometric quality of these instruments, we performed a systematic literature search in Medline and PsycInfo (last: February 25, 2022). Peer-reviewed journal articles published in English with a child-rated instrument measuring the quality of parent-child communication were included. Initial screening for eligibility and inclusion, subsequent data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by couples of review team members. Based on the screening of 5115 articles, 106 studies reported in 126 papers were included. We identified 12 parent-child communication instruments across the studies. The Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS) was used in 75% of the studies. On average, the evidence for psychometric quality of the instruments was low. Few instruments were used in clinical and at-risk samples. Several instruments are available to rate parent-child communication from the child's perspective. However, their psychometric evidence is limited and the theoretical foundation is largely undocumented. This review has limitations with regard to selection criteria and language bias.Registration PROSPERO: CRD42021255264.

AB - Parent-child communication represents an important variable in clinical child and family psychology due to its association with a variety of psychosocial outcomes. To give an overview of instruments designed to measure the quality of parent-child communication from the child's (8-21 years) perspective and to assess the psychometric quality of these instruments, we performed a systematic literature search in Medline and PsycInfo (last: February 25, 2022). Peer-reviewed journal articles published in English with a child-rated instrument measuring the quality of parent-child communication were included. Initial screening for eligibility and inclusion, subsequent data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by couples of review team members. Based on the screening of 5115 articles, 106 studies reported in 126 papers were included. We identified 12 parent-child communication instruments across the studies. The Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS) was used in 75% of the studies. On average, the evidence for psychometric quality of the instruments was low. Few instruments were used in clinical and at-risk samples. Several instruments are available to rate parent-child communication from the child's perspective. However, their psychometric evidence is limited and the theoretical foundation is largely undocumented. This review has limitations with regard to selection criteria and language bias.Registration PROSPERO: CRD42021255264.

U2 - 10.1007/s10567-022-00414-3

DO - 10.1007/s10567-022-00414-3

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 36166179

VL - 26

SP - 121

EP - 142

JO - CLIN CHILD FAM PSYCH

JF - CLIN CHILD FAM PSYCH

SN - 1096-4037

IS - 1

ER -