A systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis to determine the incremental value of copeptin for rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction
Standard
A systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis to determine the incremental value of copeptin for rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction. / Lipinski, Michael J; Escárcega, Ricardo O; D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio; Magalhães, Marco A; Baker, Nevin C; Torguson, Rebecca; Chen, Fang; Epstein, Stephen E; Miró, Oscar; Llorens, Pere; Giannitsis, Evangelos; Lotze, Ulrich; Lefebvre, Sophie; Sebbane, Mustapha; Cristol, Jean-Paul; Chenevier-Gobeaux, Camille; Meune, Christophe; Eggers, Kai M; Charpentier, Sandrine; Twerenbold, Raphael; Mueller, Christian; Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe; Waksman, Ron.
in: AM J CARDIOL, Jahrgang 113, Nr. 9, 01.05.2014, S. 1581-91.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Review › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis to determine the incremental value of copeptin for rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction
AU - Lipinski, Michael J
AU - Escárcega, Ricardo O
AU - D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio
AU - Magalhães, Marco A
AU - Baker, Nevin C
AU - Torguson, Rebecca
AU - Chen, Fang
AU - Epstein, Stephen E
AU - Miró, Oscar
AU - Llorens, Pere
AU - Giannitsis, Evangelos
AU - Lotze, Ulrich
AU - Lefebvre, Sophie
AU - Sebbane, Mustapha
AU - Cristol, Jean-Paul
AU - Chenevier-Gobeaux, Camille
AU - Meune, Christophe
AU - Eggers, Kai M
AU - Charpentier, Sandrine
AU - Twerenbold, Raphael
AU - Mueller, Christian
AU - Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
AU - Waksman, Ron
N1 - Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/5/1
Y1 - 2014/5/1
N2 - Multiple studies have evaluated copeptin, a surrogate for arginine vasopressin, in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with mixed results. A systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis were performed for diagnosis of AMI and assessment of prognosis in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and EMBASE were searched for studies assessing copeptin in such patients. Study investigators were contacted, and many provided previously unpublished data. Random-effects methods were used to compare the data for copeptin, troponin, and their combination. There were a total of 9,244 patients from the 14 included studies. Mean age was 62 years; 64% were men; and 18.4% were ultimately diagnosed with AMI. Patients with AMI had a higher presentation copeptin level than those without AMI (22.8 vs 8.3 pmol/L, respectively, p <0.001). Although troponin had better diagnostic accuracy than copeptin for AMI, the combination of copeptin and troponin significantly improved the sensitivity (0.905 [0.888 to 0.921] vs 0.686 [0.661 to 0.710], respectively, p <0.001) and negative predictive value (0.97 [0.964 to 0.975] vs 0.93 [0.924 to 0.936], respectively, p <0.001) compared with troponin alone. Elevation in copeptin carried a similar risk of all-cause mortality to an elevation in troponin (odds ratio 5.84 vs 6.74, respectively, p = 0.67). In conclusion, copeptin not only identifies patients at risk of all-cause mortality, but its addition to troponin improved the sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio for diagnosis of AMI compared with troponin alone. Thus, copeptin may help identify patients who may be safely discharged early from the emergency department.
AB - Multiple studies have evaluated copeptin, a surrogate for arginine vasopressin, in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with mixed results. A systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis were performed for diagnosis of AMI and assessment of prognosis in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and EMBASE were searched for studies assessing copeptin in such patients. Study investigators were contacted, and many provided previously unpublished data. Random-effects methods were used to compare the data for copeptin, troponin, and their combination. There were a total of 9,244 patients from the 14 included studies. Mean age was 62 years; 64% were men; and 18.4% were ultimately diagnosed with AMI. Patients with AMI had a higher presentation copeptin level than those without AMI (22.8 vs 8.3 pmol/L, respectively, p <0.001). Although troponin had better diagnostic accuracy than copeptin for AMI, the combination of copeptin and troponin significantly improved the sensitivity (0.905 [0.888 to 0.921] vs 0.686 [0.661 to 0.710], respectively, p <0.001) and negative predictive value (0.97 [0.964 to 0.975] vs 0.93 [0.924 to 0.936], respectively, p <0.001) compared with troponin alone. Elevation in copeptin carried a similar risk of all-cause mortality to an elevation in troponin (odds ratio 5.84 vs 6.74, respectively, p = 0.67). In conclusion, copeptin not only identifies patients at risk of all-cause mortality, but its addition to troponin improved the sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio for diagnosis of AMI compared with troponin alone. Thus, copeptin may help identify patients who may be safely discharged early from the emergency department.
KW - Biomarkers/analysis
KW - Female
KW - Glycopeptides/physiology
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.01.436
DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.01.436
M3 - SCORING: Review article
C2 - 24731654
VL - 113
SP - 1581
EP - 1591
JO - AM J CARDIOL
JF - AM J CARDIOL
SN - 0002-9149
IS - 9
ER -