A randomized trial evaluating a predominantly fetal growth-based strategy to guide management of gestational diabetes in Caucasian women.
Standard
A randomized trial evaluating a predominantly fetal growth-based strategy to guide management of gestational diabetes in Caucasian women. / Schaefer-Graf, Ute M; Kjos, Siri L; Fauzan, Ostary H; Bühling, Kai J.; Siebert, Gerda; Bührer, Christoph; Ladendorf, Barbara; Dudenhausen, Joachim W; Vetter, Klaus.
in: DIABETES CARE, Jahrgang 27, Nr. 2, 2, 2004, S. 297-302.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A randomized trial evaluating a predominantly fetal growth-based strategy to guide management of gestational diabetes in Caucasian women.
AU - Schaefer-Graf, Ute M
AU - Kjos, Siri L
AU - Fauzan, Ostary H
AU - Bühling, Kai J.
AU - Siebert, Gerda
AU - Bührer, Christoph
AU - Ladendorf, Barbara
AU - Dudenhausen, Joachim W
AU - Vetter, Klaus
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare the management of Caucasian women with gestational diabetes (GDM) based predominantly on monthly fetal growth ultrasound examinations with an approach based solely on maternal glycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Women with GDM who attained fasting capillary glucose (FCG) 90 mg/dl or 2h-CG was >120 mg/dl. In the ultrasound group, thresholds were 120 and 200 mg/dl, respectively, or a fetal abdominal circumference >75th percentile (AC>p75). Outcome criteria were rates of C-section, small-for-gestational-age (SGA) or large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants, neonatal hypoglycemia (p75 (36.0 vs. 38.4%) at entry did not differ between the standard (n = 100) and ultrasound groups (n = 99). Assignment to (30.0 vs. 40.4%) and mean duration of insulin treatment (8.3 vs. 8.1 weeks) did not differ between groups. In the ultrasound group, AC>p75 was the sole indication for insulin. The ultrasound-based strategy, as compared with the maternal glycemia-only strategy, resulted in a different treatment assignment in 34% of women. Rates of C-section (19.0 vs. 18.2%), LGA (10.0 vs. 12.1%), SGA (13.0 vs. 12.1%), hypoglycemia (16.0 vs. 17.0%), and admission (15.0 vs. 14.1%) did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: GDM management based on fetal growth combined with high glycemic criteria provides outcomes equivalent to management based on strict glycemic criteria alone. Inclusion of fetal growth might provide the opportunity to reduce glucose testing in low-risk pregnancies.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare the management of Caucasian women with gestational diabetes (GDM) based predominantly on monthly fetal growth ultrasound examinations with an approach based solely on maternal glycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Women with GDM who attained fasting capillary glucose (FCG) 90 mg/dl or 2h-CG was >120 mg/dl. In the ultrasound group, thresholds were 120 and 200 mg/dl, respectively, or a fetal abdominal circumference >75th percentile (AC>p75). Outcome criteria were rates of C-section, small-for-gestational-age (SGA) or large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants, neonatal hypoglycemia (p75 (36.0 vs. 38.4%) at entry did not differ between the standard (n = 100) and ultrasound groups (n = 99). Assignment to (30.0 vs. 40.4%) and mean duration of insulin treatment (8.3 vs. 8.1 weeks) did not differ between groups. In the ultrasound group, AC>p75 was the sole indication for insulin. The ultrasound-based strategy, as compared with the maternal glycemia-only strategy, resulted in a different treatment assignment in 34% of women. Rates of C-section (19.0 vs. 18.2%), LGA (10.0 vs. 12.1%), SGA (13.0 vs. 12.1%), hypoglycemia (16.0 vs. 17.0%), and admission (15.0 vs. 14.1%) did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: GDM management based on fetal growth combined with high glycemic criteria provides outcomes equivalent to management based on strict glycemic criteria alone. Inclusion of fetal growth might provide the opportunity to reduce glucose testing in low-risk pregnancies.
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
VL - 27
SP - 297
EP - 302
JO - DIABETES CARE
JF - DIABETES CARE
SN - 0149-5992
IS - 2
M1 - 2
ER -