A novel assessment of local impedance during catheter ablation: initial experience in humans comparing local and generator measurements
Standard
A novel assessment of local impedance during catheter ablation: initial experience in humans comparing local and generator measurements. / Gunawardene, Melanie; Münkler, Paula; Eickholt, Christian; Akbulak, Ruken Ö; Jularic, Mario; Klatt, Niklas; Hartmann, Jens; Dinshaw, Leon; Jungen, Christiane; Moser, Julia M; Merbold, Lydia; Willems, Stephan; Meyer, Christian.
in: EUROPACE, Jahrgang 21, Nr. Supplement_1, 01.01.2019, S. i34-i42.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A novel assessment of local impedance during catheter ablation: initial experience in humans comparing local and generator measurements
AU - Gunawardene, Melanie
AU - Münkler, Paula
AU - Eickholt, Christian
AU - Akbulak, Ruken Ö
AU - Jularic, Mario
AU - Klatt, Niklas
AU - Hartmann, Jens
AU - Dinshaw, Leon
AU - Jungen, Christiane
AU - Moser, Julia M
AU - Merbold, Lydia
AU - Willems, Stephan
AU - Meyer, Christian
N1 - Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - AIMS: A novel measure of local impedance (LI) has been found to predict lesion formation during radiofrequency current (RFC) catheter ablation. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of this novel approach, while comparing LI to the well-established generator impedance (GI).METHODS AND RESULTS: In 25 consecutive patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation was guided by a 3D-mapping system measuring LI in addition to GI via an ablation catheter tip with three incorporated mini-electrodes. Local impedance and GI before and during RFC applications were studied. In total, 381 RFC applications were analysed. The baseline LI was higher in high-voltage areas (>0.5 mV; LI: 110.5 ± 13.7 Ω) when compared with intermediate-voltage sites (0.1-0.5 mV; 90.9 ± 10.1 Ω, P < 0.001), low-voltage areas (<0.1 mV; 91.9 ± 16.4 Ω, P < 0.001), and blood pool LI (91.9 ± 9.9 Ω, P < 0.001). During ablation, mean LI drop (△LI; 13.1 ± 9.1 Ω) was 2.15 times higher as mean GI drop (△GI) (6.1 ± 4.2 Ω, P < 0.001). Baseline LI correlated with △LI: a mean LI of 99.9 Ω predicted a △LI of 12.9 Ω [95% confidence interval (12.1-13.6), R2 0.41; P < 0.001]. This relationship was weak for baseline GI predicting △GI (R2 0.06, P < 0.001). Catheter movements were represented by rapid LI changes. The duration of an RFC application was not predictive for catheter-tissue coupling with no further change of △LI (P = 0.247) nor △GI (P = 0.376) during prolonged ablation.CONCLUSION: Local impedance can be monitored during ablation. Compared with the sole use of GI, baseline LI is a better predictor of impedance drops during ablation and may provide useful insights regarding lesion formation. However, further studies are needed to investigate if this novel approach is useful to guide catheter ablation.
AB - AIMS: A novel measure of local impedance (LI) has been found to predict lesion formation during radiofrequency current (RFC) catheter ablation. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of this novel approach, while comparing LI to the well-established generator impedance (GI).METHODS AND RESULTS: In 25 consecutive patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation was guided by a 3D-mapping system measuring LI in addition to GI via an ablation catheter tip with three incorporated mini-electrodes. Local impedance and GI before and during RFC applications were studied. In total, 381 RFC applications were analysed. The baseline LI was higher in high-voltage areas (>0.5 mV; LI: 110.5 ± 13.7 Ω) when compared with intermediate-voltage sites (0.1-0.5 mV; 90.9 ± 10.1 Ω, P < 0.001), low-voltage areas (<0.1 mV; 91.9 ± 16.4 Ω, P < 0.001), and blood pool LI (91.9 ± 9.9 Ω, P < 0.001). During ablation, mean LI drop (△LI; 13.1 ± 9.1 Ω) was 2.15 times higher as mean GI drop (△GI) (6.1 ± 4.2 Ω, P < 0.001). Baseline LI correlated with △LI: a mean LI of 99.9 Ω predicted a △LI of 12.9 Ω [95% confidence interval (12.1-13.6), R2 0.41; P < 0.001]. This relationship was weak for baseline GI predicting △GI (R2 0.06, P < 0.001). Catheter movements were represented by rapid LI changes. The duration of an RFC application was not predictive for catheter-tissue coupling with no further change of △LI (P = 0.247) nor △GI (P = 0.376) during prolonged ablation.CONCLUSION: Local impedance can be monitored during ablation. Compared with the sole use of GI, baseline LI is a better predictor of impedance drops during ablation and may provide useful insights regarding lesion formation. However, further studies are needed to investigate if this novel approach is useful to guide catheter ablation.
KW - Aged
KW - Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology
KW - Catheter Ablation/methods
KW - Electric Impedance
KW - Epicardial Mapping
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Pilot Projects
KW - Radio Waves
U2 - 10.1093/europace/euy273
DO - 10.1093/europace/euy273
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 30801126
VL - 21
SP - i34-i42
JO - EUROPACE
JF - EUROPACE
SN - 1099-5129
IS - Supplement_1
ER -