A cross-sectional survey of physical strains among offshore wind farm workers in the German exclusive economic zone

Standard

A cross-sectional survey of physical strains among offshore wind farm workers in the German exclusive economic zone. / Velasco Garrido, Marcial; Mette, Janika; Mache, Stefanie; Harth, Volker; Preisser, Alexandra M.

in: BMJ OPEN, Jahrgang 8, Nr. 3, 30.03.2018, S. e020157.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{aec6115ccdb849e2a97ce39c22603190,
title = "A cross-sectional survey of physical strains among offshore wind farm workers in the German exclusive economic zone",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To assess the physical strains of employees in the German offshore wind industry, according to job type and phase of the wind farm (under construction or operation).DESIGN: Web-based cross-sectional survey.SETTING: Offshore wind farm companies operating within the German exclusive economic zone.PARTICIPANTS: Male workers with regular offshore commitments and at least 28 days spent offshore in the past year (n=268).OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical strains (eg, climbing, noise, working overhead, with twisted upper body or in confined spaces, vibration, heavy lifting, humidity, odours).RESULTS: The most frequently mentioned physical strain was 'climbing' with 63.8% of the respondents reporting to be always or frequently confronted with climbing and ascending stairs during offshore work. Work as a technician was associated with a greater exposition to noise, vibrations, humidity, cold, heat, chemical substances, lifting/carrying heavy loads, transport of equipment, working in non-ergonomic positions and in cramped spaces, as well as climbing.Indeed, statistical analyses showed that, after adjusting for phase of the wind farm, age, nationality, offshore experience, work schedule and type of shift, compared with non-technicians, working as a technician was associated with more frequently lifting/carrying of heavy loads (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.58 to 4.23), transport of equipment (OR 2.06 95% CI 1.27 to 3.33), working with a twisted upper body (OR 2.85 95% CI 1.74 to 4.69), working overhead (OR 2.77 95% CI 1.67 to 4.58) and climbing (OR 2.30 95% CI 1.40 to 3.77). Working in wind farms under construction was strongly associated with increased and decreased exposure to humidity (OR 2.32 95% CI 1.38 to 3.92) and poor air quality (OR 0.58 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95), respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Workers on offshore wind farms constitute a heterogeneous group, including a wide variety of occupations. The degree of exposure to detrimental physical strains varies depending on the type of job. Technicians are more exposed to ergonomic challenges than other offshore workers.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "{Velasco Garrido}, Marcial and Janika Mette and Stefanie Mache and Volker Harth and Preisser, {Alexandra M}",
note = "{\textcopyright} Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.",
year = "2018",
month = mar,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020157",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "e020157",
journal = "BMJ OPEN",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "British Medical Journal Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cross-sectional survey of physical strains among offshore wind farm workers in the German exclusive economic zone

AU - Velasco Garrido, Marcial

AU - Mette, Janika

AU - Mache, Stefanie

AU - Harth, Volker

AU - Preisser, Alexandra M

N1 - © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

PY - 2018/3/30

Y1 - 2018/3/30

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To assess the physical strains of employees in the German offshore wind industry, according to job type and phase of the wind farm (under construction or operation).DESIGN: Web-based cross-sectional survey.SETTING: Offshore wind farm companies operating within the German exclusive economic zone.PARTICIPANTS: Male workers with regular offshore commitments and at least 28 days spent offshore in the past year (n=268).OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical strains (eg, climbing, noise, working overhead, with twisted upper body or in confined spaces, vibration, heavy lifting, humidity, odours).RESULTS: The most frequently mentioned physical strain was 'climbing' with 63.8% of the respondents reporting to be always or frequently confronted with climbing and ascending stairs during offshore work. Work as a technician was associated with a greater exposition to noise, vibrations, humidity, cold, heat, chemical substances, lifting/carrying heavy loads, transport of equipment, working in non-ergonomic positions and in cramped spaces, as well as climbing.Indeed, statistical analyses showed that, after adjusting for phase of the wind farm, age, nationality, offshore experience, work schedule and type of shift, compared with non-technicians, working as a technician was associated with more frequently lifting/carrying of heavy loads (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.58 to 4.23), transport of equipment (OR 2.06 95% CI 1.27 to 3.33), working with a twisted upper body (OR 2.85 95% CI 1.74 to 4.69), working overhead (OR 2.77 95% CI 1.67 to 4.58) and climbing (OR 2.30 95% CI 1.40 to 3.77). Working in wind farms under construction was strongly associated with increased and decreased exposure to humidity (OR 2.32 95% CI 1.38 to 3.92) and poor air quality (OR 0.58 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95), respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Workers on offshore wind farms constitute a heterogeneous group, including a wide variety of occupations. The degree of exposure to detrimental physical strains varies depending on the type of job. Technicians are more exposed to ergonomic challenges than other offshore workers.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To assess the physical strains of employees in the German offshore wind industry, according to job type and phase of the wind farm (under construction or operation).DESIGN: Web-based cross-sectional survey.SETTING: Offshore wind farm companies operating within the German exclusive economic zone.PARTICIPANTS: Male workers with regular offshore commitments and at least 28 days spent offshore in the past year (n=268).OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical strains (eg, climbing, noise, working overhead, with twisted upper body or in confined spaces, vibration, heavy lifting, humidity, odours).RESULTS: The most frequently mentioned physical strain was 'climbing' with 63.8% of the respondents reporting to be always or frequently confronted with climbing and ascending stairs during offshore work. Work as a technician was associated with a greater exposition to noise, vibrations, humidity, cold, heat, chemical substances, lifting/carrying heavy loads, transport of equipment, working in non-ergonomic positions and in cramped spaces, as well as climbing.Indeed, statistical analyses showed that, after adjusting for phase of the wind farm, age, nationality, offshore experience, work schedule and type of shift, compared with non-technicians, working as a technician was associated with more frequently lifting/carrying of heavy loads (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.58 to 4.23), transport of equipment (OR 2.06 95% CI 1.27 to 3.33), working with a twisted upper body (OR 2.85 95% CI 1.74 to 4.69), working overhead (OR 2.77 95% CI 1.67 to 4.58) and climbing (OR 2.30 95% CI 1.40 to 3.77). Working in wind farms under construction was strongly associated with increased and decreased exposure to humidity (OR 2.32 95% CI 1.38 to 3.92) and poor air quality (OR 0.58 95% CI 0.35 to 0.95), respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Workers on offshore wind farms constitute a heterogeneous group, including a wide variety of occupations. The degree of exposure to detrimental physical strains varies depending on the type of job. Technicians are more exposed to ergonomic challenges than other offshore workers.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020157

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020157

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 29602849

VL - 8

SP - e020157

JO - BMJ OPEN

JF - BMJ OPEN

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 3

ER -