A critical appraisal of systemic treatment options for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma

  • Salima Ismail
  • Malek Meskawi
  • Jens Hansen
  • Marco Bianchi
  • Zhe Tian
  • Mathieu Latour
  • Markus Graefen
  • Francesco Montorsi
  • Quoc-Dien Trinh
  • Paul Perrotte
  • Pierre I Karakiewicz
  • Maxine Sun

Abstract

Current guidelines provide most support for the use of temsirolimus in first line therapy for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC). However, this recommendation is based on scant level 2a evidence. The objective of this review is to examine the evidence supporting first line temsirolimus use in patients with metastatic nccRCC as well as alternative first line treatment options. Six studies, that assessed the efficacy of five agents qualified for inclusion. Among recognized treatment options for metastatic nccRCC, mean weighted progression free survival values of 7.9 months for temsirolimus vs. 7.3 for sunitinib vs. 8.5 months for sorafenib vs. ≈4.1 months for erlotinib were recorded based on data from 10, 74, 33 and 51 patients respectively. In conclusion, the data supporting first line temsirolimus for metastatic nccRCC are based on a small patient sample. Sunitinib's efficacy is similar to that of temsirolimus but is based on a bigger patient sample that originates from phase II studies.

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ISSN1040-8428
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 01.04.2014
Extern publiziertJa
PubMed 24411587