A comparison of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures and the Quickert procedure for involutional entropion

Standard

A comparison of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures and the Quickert procedure for involutional entropion. / Dulz, Simon; Green, Sylvia; Mehlan, Juliane; Schüttauf, Frank; Keserü, Matthias.

in: ACTA OPHTHALMOL, Jahrgang 97, Nr. 6, 09.2019, S. e933-e936.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{43c6e671eaad463e8b14b7beceed2452,
title = "A comparison of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures and the Quickert procedure for involutional entropion",
abstract = "BACKGROUND/AIMS: To provide evidence of statistically significant difference in the surgical outcome of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures (LTS + ES) versus the Quickert procedure (QP) in the treatment of involutional entropion.METHODS: In a prospective randomized comparative trial, 66 eyelids of 52 patients with primary involutional lower eyelid entropion were recruited. Thirty-six eyelids were randomized to QP, and 30 eyelids were randomized to LTS + ES. Surgery was performed by a single surgeon. Postoperative follow-up was scheduled after 2 weeks, 8 and 14 months. Successful surgery was defined as a normal eyelid position at rest and inability to induce entropion on forced eyelid closure at or before the 14-month follow-up visit.RESULTS: A total of 66 eyelids of 52 patients were enrolled in the study. Three patients did not complete follow-up (1 did not attend the 8 months follow-up visit; 2 did not attend 14 months follow-up visit). Of the 63 patients, a single eyelid [success probability 0.97; confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1] in the QP group and two treated eyelids [success probability of 0.93; CI: 0.85-1] in the LTS + ES group had a recurrence of a lower eyelid entropion after 14 months. There was no statistically significant difference in surgical failure between the LTS + ES versus QP (Log-rank test: p = 0.46).CONCLUSION: These data provide strong evidence that success rates at 14 months are similar in patients treated with either techniques (LTS + ES versus QP).",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Simon Dulz and Sylvia Green and Juliane Mehlan and Frank Sch{\"u}ttauf and Matthias Keser{\"u}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2019 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2019",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1111/aos.14093",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "e933--e936",
journal = "ACTA OPHTHALMOL",
issn = "1755-375X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures and the Quickert procedure for involutional entropion

AU - Dulz, Simon

AU - Green, Sylvia

AU - Mehlan, Juliane

AU - Schüttauf, Frank

AU - Keserü, Matthias

N1 - © 2019 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2019/9

Y1 - 2019/9

N2 - BACKGROUND/AIMS: To provide evidence of statistically significant difference in the surgical outcome of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures (LTS + ES) versus the Quickert procedure (QP) in the treatment of involutional entropion.METHODS: In a prospective randomized comparative trial, 66 eyelids of 52 patients with primary involutional lower eyelid entropion were recruited. Thirty-six eyelids were randomized to QP, and 30 eyelids were randomized to LTS + ES. Surgery was performed by a single surgeon. Postoperative follow-up was scheduled after 2 weeks, 8 and 14 months. Successful surgery was defined as a normal eyelid position at rest and inability to induce entropion on forced eyelid closure at or before the 14-month follow-up visit.RESULTS: A total of 66 eyelids of 52 patients were enrolled in the study. Three patients did not complete follow-up (1 did not attend the 8 months follow-up visit; 2 did not attend 14 months follow-up visit). Of the 63 patients, a single eyelid [success probability 0.97; confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1] in the QP group and two treated eyelids [success probability of 0.93; CI: 0.85-1] in the LTS + ES group had a recurrence of a lower eyelid entropion after 14 months. There was no statistically significant difference in surgical failure between the LTS + ES versus QP (Log-rank test: p = 0.46).CONCLUSION: These data provide strong evidence that success rates at 14 months are similar in patients treated with either techniques (LTS + ES versus QP).

AB - BACKGROUND/AIMS: To provide evidence of statistically significant difference in the surgical outcome of the lateral tarsal strip with everting sutures (LTS + ES) versus the Quickert procedure (QP) in the treatment of involutional entropion.METHODS: In a prospective randomized comparative trial, 66 eyelids of 52 patients with primary involutional lower eyelid entropion were recruited. Thirty-six eyelids were randomized to QP, and 30 eyelids were randomized to LTS + ES. Surgery was performed by a single surgeon. Postoperative follow-up was scheduled after 2 weeks, 8 and 14 months. Successful surgery was defined as a normal eyelid position at rest and inability to induce entropion on forced eyelid closure at or before the 14-month follow-up visit.RESULTS: A total of 66 eyelids of 52 patients were enrolled in the study. Three patients did not complete follow-up (1 did not attend the 8 months follow-up visit; 2 did not attend 14 months follow-up visit). Of the 63 patients, a single eyelid [success probability 0.97; confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1] in the QP group and two treated eyelids [success probability of 0.93; CI: 0.85-1] in the LTS + ES group had a recurrence of a lower eyelid entropion after 14 months. There was no statistically significant difference in surgical failure between the LTS + ES versus QP (Log-rank test: p = 0.46).CONCLUSION: These data provide strong evidence that success rates at 14 months are similar in patients treated with either techniques (LTS + ES versus QP).

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1111/aos.14093

DO - 10.1111/aos.14093

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 30916886

VL - 97

SP - e933-e936

JO - ACTA OPHTHALMOL

JF - ACTA OPHTHALMOL

SN - 1755-375X

IS - 6

ER -