PortalPublikationenA comparison between the Static Balance Test and the Berg Ba...

A comparison between the Static Balance Test and the Berg Balance Scale validity, reliability, and comparative resource use

Standard

A comparison between the Static Balance Test and the Berg Balance Scale validity, reliability, and comparative resource use. / Pickenbrock, Heidrun Maria; Diel, Andrea; Zapf, Antonia.

in: CLIN REHABIL, Jahrgang 30, Nr. 3, 03.2016, S. 288-293.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Pickenbrock, HM, Diel, A & Zapf, A 2016, 'A comparison between the Static Balance Test and the Berg Balance Scale validity, reliability, and comparative resource use', CLIN REHABIL, Jg. 30, Nr. 3, S. 288-293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215515578297

APA

Pickenbrock, H. M., Diel, A., & Zapf, A. (2016). A comparison between the Static Balance Test and the Berg Balance Scale validity, reliability, and comparative resource use. CLIN REHABIL, 30(3), 288-293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215515578297

Vancouver

Pickenbrock HM, Diel A, Zapf A. A comparison between the Static Balance Test and the Berg Balance Scale validity, reliability, and comparative resource use. CLIN REHABIL. 2016 Mär;30(3):288-293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215515578297

Bibtex

@article{624d15aa6add47d1bc65c55b996a3173,
title = "A comparison between the Static Balance Test and the Berg Balance Scale validity, reliability, and comparative resource use",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Within a sample of acute post-stroke patients, to compare the score on the Berg Balance Scale and the Static Balance Test for validity, inter-rater reliability, and the expenditure of time.DESIGN: Prospective, intra-individual, cross-sectional evaluation study.SETTING: Acute stroke unit of a university hospital in Germany.PARTICIPANTS: A total of 53 patients with acute stroke who did not have other pathology affecting their balance.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: For intra-individual comparisons of the Berg Balance Scale and the Static Balance Test, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated. For inter-rater reliability, Bland Altman plots were drawn and the corresponding mean difference and limits of agreement were calculated.RESULTS: The Static Balance Test took three to five minutes; the Berg Balance Scale 20-30 minutes. There was a high correlation between the scores on the Berg Balance Scale and the Static Balance Test (r = 0.91). For the Berg Balance Scale, the mean difference between the two raters was 0.13 and the limits of agreement were small (-0.25; 0.51). For the Static Balance Test, the mean difference between the two raters was -0.02 and also the limits of agreement (-0.06; 0.02) were even smaller than for the Berg Balance Scale. Both scales showed excellent inter-rater reliability.CONCLUSION: The Static Balance Test was compared with the Berg Balance Scale and turned out to be equally valid, more reliable, and takes much less time. For the moment, the scale can be recommended for the use in acute stroke care, especially for the daily routine therapy.",
keywords = "Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Observer Variation, Postural Balance, Prospective Studies, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Sensation Disorders, Stroke, Time Factors, Comparative Study, Journal Article",
author = "Pickenbrock, {Heidrun Maria} and Andrea Diel and Antonia Zapf",
note = "{\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2015.",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1177/0269215515578297",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "288--293",
journal = "CLIN REHABIL",
issn = "0269-2155",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison between the Static Balance Test and the Berg Balance Scale validity, reliability, and comparative resource use

AU - Pickenbrock, Heidrun Maria

AU - Diel, Andrea

AU - Zapf, Antonia

N1 - © The Author(s) 2015.

PY - 2016/3

Y1 - 2016/3

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Within a sample of acute post-stroke patients, to compare the score on the Berg Balance Scale and the Static Balance Test for validity, inter-rater reliability, and the expenditure of time.DESIGN: Prospective, intra-individual, cross-sectional evaluation study.SETTING: Acute stroke unit of a university hospital in Germany.PARTICIPANTS: A total of 53 patients with acute stroke who did not have other pathology affecting their balance.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: For intra-individual comparisons of the Berg Balance Scale and the Static Balance Test, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated. For inter-rater reliability, Bland Altman plots were drawn and the corresponding mean difference and limits of agreement were calculated.RESULTS: The Static Balance Test took three to five minutes; the Berg Balance Scale 20-30 minutes. There was a high correlation between the scores on the Berg Balance Scale and the Static Balance Test (r = 0.91). For the Berg Balance Scale, the mean difference between the two raters was 0.13 and the limits of agreement were small (-0.25; 0.51). For the Static Balance Test, the mean difference between the two raters was -0.02 and also the limits of agreement (-0.06; 0.02) were even smaller than for the Berg Balance Scale. Both scales showed excellent inter-rater reliability.CONCLUSION: The Static Balance Test was compared with the Berg Balance Scale and turned out to be equally valid, more reliable, and takes much less time. For the moment, the scale can be recommended for the use in acute stroke care, especially for the daily routine therapy.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Within a sample of acute post-stroke patients, to compare the score on the Berg Balance Scale and the Static Balance Test for validity, inter-rater reliability, and the expenditure of time.DESIGN: Prospective, intra-individual, cross-sectional evaluation study.SETTING: Acute stroke unit of a university hospital in Germany.PARTICIPANTS: A total of 53 patients with acute stroke who did not have other pathology affecting their balance.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: For intra-individual comparisons of the Berg Balance Scale and the Static Balance Test, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated. For inter-rater reliability, Bland Altman plots were drawn and the corresponding mean difference and limits of agreement were calculated.RESULTS: The Static Balance Test took three to five minutes; the Berg Balance Scale 20-30 minutes. There was a high correlation between the scores on the Berg Balance Scale and the Static Balance Test (r = 0.91). For the Berg Balance Scale, the mean difference between the two raters was 0.13 and the limits of agreement were small (-0.25; 0.51). For the Static Balance Test, the mean difference between the two raters was -0.02 and also the limits of agreement (-0.06; 0.02) were even smaller than for the Berg Balance Scale. Both scales showed excellent inter-rater reliability.CONCLUSION: The Static Balance Test was compared with the Berg Balance Scale and turned out to be equally valid, more reliable, and takes much less time. For the moment, the scale can be recommended for the use in acute stroke care, especially for the daily routine therapy.

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Cross-Sectional Studies

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Observer Variation

KW - Postural Balance

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Sensation Disorders

KW - Stroke

KW - Time Factors

KW - Comparative Study

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1177/0269215515578297

DO - 10.1177/0269215515578297

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25802425

VL - 30

SP - 288

EP - 293

JO - CLIN REHABIL

JF - CLIN REHABIL

SN - 0269-2155

IS - 3

ER -