A comparative biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for unstable femoral neck fractures: the Intertan versus cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw.

Standard

A comparative biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for unstable femoral neck fractures: the Intertan versus cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw. / Rupprecht, Martin; Großterlinden, Lars Gerhard; Rücker, Andreas H.; Oliveira, de; Novo, Alexander; Nüchtern, Jakob V.; Püschel, Klaus; Morlock, Michael; Rueger, Johannes Maria; Lehmann, Wolfgang; Lehmann, Wolfgang.

in: J TRAUMA, Jahrgang 71, Nr. 3, 3, 01.09.2011, S. 625-634.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Rupprecht, M, Großterlinden, LG, Rücker, AH, Oliveira, D, Novo, A, Nüchtern, JV, Püschel, K, Morlock, M, Rueger, JM, Lehmann, W & Lehmann, W 2011, 'A comparative biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for unstable femoral neck fractures: the Intertan versus cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw.', J TRAUMA, Jg. 71, Nr. 3, 3, S. 625-634. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31820e86e6

APA

Rupprecht, M., Großterlinden, L. G., Rücker, A. H., Oliveira, D., Novo, A., Nüchtern, J. V., Püschel, K., Morlock, M., Rueger, J. M., Lehmann, W., & Lehmann, W. (2011). A comparative biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for unstable femoral neck fractures: the Intertan versus cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw. J TRAUMA, 71(3), 625-634. [3]. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31820e86e6

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{14cc724466c748c3b90bcedd78fb7c4e,
title = "A comparative biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for unstable femoral neck fractures: the Intertan versus cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw.",
abstract = "First introduced in 2005, the {"}Intertan{"} (IT), an intramedullary nail with two cephalocervical screws, has become an increasingly popular option for treating intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this study was to identify the utility of this device for stabilization of unstable femoral neck fractures compared with cannulated screws (CS) and a dynamic hip screw (DHS).",
keywords = "Adult, Humans, Male, Aged, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cadaver, Materials Testing, Bone Density, *Bone Screws, Equipment Failure Analysis, Femoral Neck Fractures/pathology/*surgery, Fracture Fixation, Internal/*instrumentation, *Internal Fixators, Pliability, Weight-Bearing, Adult, Humans, Male, Aged, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cadaver, Materials Testing, Bone Density, *Bone Screws, Equipment Failure Analysis, Femoral Neck Fractures/pathology/*surgery, Fracture Fixation, Internal/*instrumentation, *Internal Fixators, Pliability, Weight-Bearing",
author = "Martin Rupprecht and Gro{\ss}terlinden, {Lars Gerhard} and R{\"u}cker, {Andreas H.} and de Oliveira and Alexander Novo and N{\"u}chtern, {Jakob V.} and Klaus P{\"u}schel and Michael Morlock and Rueger, {Johannes Maria} and Wolfgang Lehmann and Wolfgang Lehmann",
year = "2011",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e31820e86e6",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "625--634",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for unstable femoral neck fractures: the Intertan versus cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw.

AU - Rupprecht, Martin

AU - Großterlinden, Lars Gerhard

AU - Rücker, Andreas H.

AU - Oliveira, de

AU - Novo, Alexander

AU - Nüchtern, Jakob V.

AU - Püschel, Klaus

AU - Morlock, Michael

AU - Rueger, Johannes Maria

AU - Lehmann, Wolfgang

AU - Lehmann, Wolfgang

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - First introduced in 2005, the "Intertan" (IT), an intramedullary nail with two cephalocervical screws, has become an increasingly popular option for treating intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this study was to identify the utility of this device for stabilization of unstable femoral neck fractures compared with cannulated screws (CS) and a dynamic hip screw (DHS).

AB - First introduced in 2005, the "Intertan" (IT), an intramedullary nail with two cephalocervical screws, has become an increasingly popular option for treating intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this study was to identify the utility of this device for stabilization of unstable femoral neck fractures compared with cannulated screws (CS) and a dynamic hip screw (DHS).

KW - Adult

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Aged

KW - Female

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Cadaver

KW - Materials Testing

KW - Bone Density

KW - Bone Screws

KW - Equipment Failure Analysis

KW - Femoral Neck Fractures/pathology/surgery

KW - Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation

KW - Internal Fixators

KW - Pliability

KW - Weight-Bearing

KW - Adult

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Aged

KW - Female

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Cadaver

KW - Materials Testing

KW - Bone Density

KW - Bone Screws

KW - Equipment Failure Analysis

KW - Femoral Neck Fractures/pathology/surgery

KW - Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation

KW - Internal Fixators

KW - Pliability

KW - Weight-Bearing

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e31820e86e6

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e31820e86e6

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 21768904

VL - 71

SP - 625

EP - 634

IS - 3

M1 - 3

ER -