Prostate cancer risk, screening and management in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations
Standard
Prostate cancer risk, screening and management in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. / Rajwa, Pawel; Quhal, Fahad; Pradere, Benjamin; Gandaglia, Giorgio; Ploussard, Guillaume; Leapman, Michael S; Gore, John L; Paradysz, Andrzej; Tilki, Derya; Merseburger, Axel S; Morgan, Todd M; Briganti, Alberto; Palapattu, Ganesh S; Shariat, Shahrokh F.
In: NAT REV UROL, Vol. 20, No. 4, 04.2023, p. 205-216.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Review article › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Prostate cancer risk, screening and management in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations
AU - Rajwa, Pawel
AU - Quhal, Fahad
AU - Pradere, Benjamin
AU - Gandaglia, Giorgio
AU - Ploussard, Guillaume
AU - Leapman, Michael S
AU - Gore, John L
AU - Paradysz, Andrzej
AU - Tilki, Derya
AU - Merseburger, Axel S
AU - Morgan, Todd M
AU - Briganti, Alberto
AU - Palapattu, Ganesh S
AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F
N1 - © 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumour suppressor genes are associated with prostate cancer risk; however, optimal screening protocols for individuals with these mutations have been a subject of debate. Several prospective studies of prostate cancer incidence and screening among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have indicated at least a twofold to fourfold increase in prostate cancer risk among carriers of BRCA2 mutations compared with the general population. Moreover, BRCA2 mutations are associated with more aggressive, high-grade disease characteristics at diagnosis, more aggressive clinical behaviour and greater prostate cancer-specific mortality. The risk for BRCA1 mutations seems to be attenuated compared with BRCA2. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement or prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone is an imperfect indicator of clinically significant prostate cancer; therefore, BRCA1/2 mutation carriers might benefit from refined risk stratification strategies. However, the long-term impact of prostate cancer screening is unknown, and the optimal management of BRCA1/2 carriers with prostate cancer has not been defined. Whether timely localized therapy can improve overall survival in the screened population is uncertain. Long-term results of prospective studies are awaited to confirm the optimal screening strategies and benefits of prostate cancer screening among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, and whether these approaches ultimately have a positive impact on survival and quality of life in these patients.
AB - Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumour suppressor genes are associated with prostate cancer risk; however, optimal screening protocols for individuals with these mutations have been a subject of debate. Several prospective studies of prostate cancer incidence and screening among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have indicated at least a twofold to fourfold increase in prostate cancer risk among carriers of BRCA2 mutations compared with the general population. Moreover, BRCA2 mutations are associated with more aggressive, high-grade disease characteristics at diagnosis, more aggressive clinical behaviour and greater prostate cancer-specific mortality. The risk for BRCA1 mutations seems to be attenuated compared with BRCA2. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement or prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone is an imperfect indicator of clinically significant prostate cancer; therefore, BRCA1/2 mutation carriers might benefit from refined risk stratification strategies. However, the long-term impact of prostate cancer screening is unknown, and the optimal management of BRCA1/2 carriers with prostate cancer has not been defined. Whether timely localized therapy can improve overall survival in the screened population is uncertain. Long-term results of prospective studies are awaited to confirm the optimal screening strategies and benefits of prostate cancer screening among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, and whether these approaches ultimately have a positive impact on survival and quality of life in these patients.
U2 - 10.1038/s41585-022-00680-4
DO - 10.1038/s41585-022-00680-4
M3 - SCORING: Review article
C2 - 36600087
VL - 20
SP - 205
EP - 216
JO - NAT REV UROL
JF - NAT REV UROL
SN - 1759-4812
IS - 4
ER -