Osteoporotic hip fracture prediction from risk factors available in administrative claims data - A machine learning approach

Standard

Osteoporotic hip fracture prediction from risk factors available in administrative claims data - A machine learning approach. / Engels, Alexander; Reber, Katrin C; Lindlbauer, Ivonne; Rapp, Kilian; Büchele, Gisela; Klenk, Jochen; Meid, Andreas; Becker, Clemens; König, Hans-Helmut.

In: PLOS ONE, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2020, p. e0232969.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Engels, A, Reber, KC, Lindlbauer, I, Rapp, K, Büchele, G, Klenk, J, Meid, A, Becker, C & König, H-H 2020, 'Osteoporotic hip fracture prediction from risk factors available in administrative claims data - A machine learning approach', PLOS ONE, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. e0232969. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232969

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{18f30add98bf4bfaa3687198f0e82291,
title = "Osteoporotic hip fracture prediction from risk factors available in administrative claims data - A machine learning approach",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Hip fractures are among the most frequently occurring fragility fractures in older adults, associated with a loss of quality of life, high mortality, and high use of healthcare resources. The aim was to apply the superlearner method to predict osteoporotic hip fractures using administrative claims data and to compare its performance to established methods.METHODS: We devided claims data of 288,086 individuals aged 65 years and older without care level into a training (80%) and a validation set (20%). Subsequently, we trained a superlearner algorithm that considered both regression and machine learning algorithms (e.g., support vector machines, RUSBoost) on a large set of clinical risk factors. Mean squared error and measures of discrimination and calibration were employed to assess prediction performance.RESULTS: All algorithms used in the analysis showed similar performance with an AUC ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 in the training and 0.65 to 0.70 in the validation set. Superlearner showed good discrimination in the training set but poorer discrimination and calibration in the validation set.CONCLUSIONS: The superlearner achieved similar predictive performance compared to the individual algorithms included. Nevertheless, in the presence of non-linearity and complex interactions, this method might be a flexible alternative to be considered for risk prediction in large datasets.",
author = "Alexander Engels and Reber, {Katrin C} and Ivonne Lindlbauer and Kilian Rapp and Gisela B{\"u}chele and Jochen Klenk and Andreas Meid and Clemens Becker and Hans-Helmut K{\"o}nig",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0232969",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "e0232969",
journal = "PLOS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Osteoporotic hip fracture prediction from risk factors available in administrative claims data - A machine learning approach

AU - Engels, Alexander

AU - Reber, Katrin C

AU - Lindlbauer, Ivonne

AU - Rapp, Kilian

AU - Büchele, Gisela

AU - Klenk, Jochen

AU - Meid, Andreas

AU - Becker, Clemens

AU - König, Hans-Helmut

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Hip fractures are among the most frequently occurring fragility fractures in older adults, associated with a loss of quality of life, high mortality, and high use of healthcare resources. The aim was to apply the superlearner method to predict osteoporotic hip fractures using administrative claims data and to compare its performance to established methods.METHODS: We devided claims data of 288,086 individuals aged 65 years and older without care level into a training (80%) and a validation set (20%). Subsequently, we trained a superlearner algorithm that considered both regression and machine learning algorithms (e.g., support vector machines, RUSBoost) on a large set of clinical risk factors. Mean squared error and measures of discrimination and calibration were employed to assess prediction performance.RESULTS: All algorithms used in the analysis showed similar performance with an AUC ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 in the training and 0.65 to 0.70 in the validation set. Superlearner showed good discrimination in the training set but poorer discrimination and calibration in the validation set.CONCLUSIONS: The superlearner achieved similar predictive performance compared to the individual algorithms included. Nevertheless, in the presence of non-linearity and complex interactions, this method might be a flexible alternative to be considered for risk prediction in large datasets.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Hip fractures are among the most frequently occurring fragility fractures in older adults, associated with a loss of quality of life, high mortality, and high use of healthcare resources. The aim was to apply the superlearner method to predict osteoporotic hip fractures using administrative claims data and to compare its performance to established methods.METHODS: We devided claims data of 288,086 individuals aged 65 years and older without care level into a training (80%) and a validation set (20%). Subsequently, we trained a superlearner algorithm that considered both regression and machine learning algorithms (e.g., support vector machines, RUSBoost) on a large set of clinical risk factors. Mean squared error and measures of discrimination and calibration were employed to assess prediction performance.RESULTS: All algorithms used in the analysis showed similar performance with an AUC ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 in the training and 0.65 to 0.70 in the validation set. Superlearner showed good discrimination in the training set but poorer discrimination and calibration in the validation set.CONCLUSIONS: The superlearner achieved similar predictive performance compared to the individual algorithms included. Nevertheless, in the presence of non-linearity and complex interactions, this method might be a flexible alternative to be considered for risk prediction in large datasets.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0232969

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0232969

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 32428007

VL - 15

SP - e0232969

JO - PLOS ONE

JF - PLOS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 5

ER -